UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
The 6 Newest Ways to Build Muscle Proven by Science (try them today)
~94 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

The 6 Newest Ways to Build Muscle Proven by Science (try them today)

Thomas DeLauer
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Study: high-volume (32 sets/exercise/week) gave 23% more muscle cross-sectional area than high-load in previously trained lifters, and higher muscle protein synthesis. Moderate-load high-volume proximity to failure drives myofibrillar hypertrophy better than chasing maximal weights for the average person.

2

Periodic 2-week volume sprints trigger sarcoplasmic expansion: intracellular water, glycogen supercompensation, and up to 8 days of ‘pump’ that can translate into permanent growth via increased cycloplasmic enzymes and satellite cell activation.

3

Metabolic stress from short rests and ‘chasing the burn’ builds inorganic phosphate and lactate, which signal VEGF, IGF, and fiber recruitment — a distinct anabolic pathway beyond mechanical tension.

4

Stretch-mediated hypertrophy (loading in lengthened positions with lighter weights) activates integrins and satellite cells, offering a low-time/low-energy option to still stimulate growth.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

3 items

Two-Week Volume Sprint

WhatDramatically increase training volume per exercise (from ~10 weekly sets to ~30-32 sets) for a dedicated 2-week block while keeping loads moderate.
WhenInsert after a standard hypertrophy mesocycle; do not do it continuously.
Dose2 weeks, then return to normal volume.
For whomIntermediate to advanced trainees who are not overly fatigued; those looking to break plateaus.
WhyTriggers sarcoplasmic expansion, glycogen supercompensation, and lasting intramuscular swelling that upregulates metabolic enzymes, leading to additional long-term growth.
CaveatsNot for those with poor recovery, joint issues, or during intense life stress; risk of overreaching if duration extended.

He explains the POS1 study where participants doing 32 sets per exercise per week gained 23% more CSA than those doing 10 sets. This was largely due to increased cycloplasmic proteins, intracellular water, and glycogen, which persisted ~8 days. The supercompensation effect occurs because the body anticipates higher training demands and stores more glycogen, pulling water along. The higher ATP demand during high volume increases cycloplasmic enzymes (creatine phosphate, etc.), which later support greater energy production for future training. The swelling from the pump stretches integrins, which are mechanosensors that activate MAPK and mTOR signaling to initiate permanent protein synthesis. Thus, temporary sarcoplasmic expansion can seed lasting myofibrillar growth. He suggests that you don't need to sustain high volume; occasional spurts are enough to reap these adaptations, aligning with Dr. Mike Israetel's block periodization concepts. The key is to layer this stimulus on top of standard mechanical tension training. He emphasizes not to go high volume all the time to avoid burnout.

Mechanism

High volume increases intramuscular ATP turnover and cycloplasmic enzyme concentration; glycogen supercompensation draws water into muscle, expanding sarcoplasm; swelling stretches integrin mechanosensors, activating mTOR and satellite cell fusion; increased blood flow from VEGF signaling (via metabolic component) aids protein synthesis.

you could do like your standard model of training with whatever volume you usually do and do a two week sprint of high volume, not just for mechanical and myofibrillar growth, like we talked about first, but this temporary growth that you might see that's really kind of cool.

Also said
“Glycogen super compensation ... the body actually says, 'Wait a minute. Is this guy going to start training a whole lot more? let's start soaking up more carbohydrates into the muscle just to prepare.'”— Explains the glycogen supercompensation mechanism underlying the sarcoplasmic expansion.
“Because of this, there's more blood flow. There was more fluid and actually potentially more growth and intracellular volume that allowed them to get stronger with that internal leverage that they got.”— Shows that the temporary swelling provides mechanical leverage and enhances blood flow, contributing to growth.

Isometric Holds for CNS and Pain Adaptation

WhatPerform static holds like wall sits or low squat holds (at a challenging angle) to failure or near failure, focusing on maintaining tension and enduring discomfort.
When1-2 times per week, as a finisher or separate session; can be done on off days.
Dose1-3 sets of 30-60 seconds holds; progress by increasing hold time or moving to more difficult joint angles.
For whomAdvanced trainees looking for a novel stimulus, those rehabbing from injury, or anyone wanting to improve mental toughness.
WhyStimulates CNS, anti-sarcopenia effects, and trains pain tolerance, which may improve overall performance and muscle activation in other lifts.
CaveatsVery intense and painful; risk of excessive muscle damage from prolonged stretches under tension. Not a primary hypertrophy driver based on current evidence; more a speculative adjunct.

He admits the science isn't settled, but notes that many highly fit academics use isometrics and maintain impressive physiques. He sees strong anecdotal evidence and ties it to the role of pain tolerance in progressive overload: “Muscle growth is rewarded to the person that can endure pain.” Isometrics are a safe way to practice enduring extreme muscular pain, which may translate to pushing harder during traditional sets. Moreover, they may strengthen the specific joint angles trained, building confidence and stability. He suggests simple movements like wall sits, or holding a low squat. This is a small addition, not a replacement for dynamic training. He remains bullish but cautious.

Mechanism

Isometric contractions at long muscle lengths create high passive tension and sustained motor unit recruitment, fatiguing the CNS in a unique way that may lead to enhanced neural drive over time. The ability to endure the high discomfort may reduce central inhibition during dynamic lifts, allowing closer proximity to true failure. Research on anti-sarcopenia suggests isometrics can trigger muscle maintenance pathways, possibly via mTOR activation independent of dynamic stretch.

Personal experience

I've seen it firsthand. ... Some of the most esteemed academic people that I know and people that are really in amazing shape do serious isometric training.

Isometric training. ... I am cautiously optimistic and I could even say bullish on isometric training.

Also said
“there's also really good anti-carcopenia ... these mechanisms where people will just do isometrics and actually preserve muscle.”— Cites anti-wasting evidence to support isometrics as a muscle-preserving stimulus.
“If you've never experienced true pain working out, try doing isometrics. It's a relatively safe way to induce that pain.”— Positions isometrics as a tool to build pain tolerance, which he links to growth.

Proximity-to-Failure with Moderate Loads

WhatUse moderate weights (approx 65-80% 1RM) for multi-set, moderate-to-high volume (e.g., 3-4 sets of 8-12 reps), taking sets close to failure (1-2 reps in reserve), and track strength gains as your primary progress marker.
WhenThis forms the base of regular training; do it consistently.
DoseEach major muscle group 2-3 times per week, 10-20 weekly sets (can vary), adjust based on recovery.
For whomAlmost all trainees, from beginners to advanced (with volume adjusted).
WhyMaximizes mechanical tension and muscle fiber recruitment; strength improvement is the best correlate of hypertrophy per the 2020 meta-analysis.
CaveatsExcessive proximity to failure can lead to systemic fatigue; use periodization and deloads.

He first discusses the Frontiers in Physiology study where high volume beat high load, then the 2020 meta-analysis that strength gains at moderate/heavy loads best predict hypertrophy. The takeaway is that the average person doesn't need to max out; doing more total work with a weight that allows 8-12 reps close to failure is more effective and sustainable. He emphasizes that this classical pathway is foundational, and the other methods are layered on top. It's about relative strength improvement, not absolute numbers. So the protocol is to structure training around progressing in moderate load exercises while using the other methods for occasional sprints.

Mechanism

Lifting moderate loads to near failure ensures high-threshold motor unit recruitment, maximizing mechanical tension across all fiber types. The resulting microdamage stimulates mTOR signaling and muscle protein synthesis. Increasing strength over time in moderate rep ranges ensures continued overload.

improving your strength is number one priority. But if you are improving your strength at a moderate load or a high load, you are going to have better improvement than just improving strength under a light load.

Also said
“proximity to failure for myofibrillar growth and ... hypertrophy, this whole process is the most important.”— Highlights proximity to failure as the key driver.
“the people that did the high volume work actually had more muscle cross-sectional area than the people that did the high load work.”— Supports using moderate loads with high volume over maximal loads.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

1 item

volume-over-heavy-load

at the very beginning, first method

A Frontiers in Physiology study showed three-day-a-week high-volume resistance training produced greater muscle cross-sectional area than high-load training, and a 2020 meta‑analysis found that moderate-to-heavy strength gains (relative) best predict hypertrophy — not absolute heavy loads.

Why this matters: It challenges the simplistic “heavier is better” dogma; for most people, moderate loads with more total volume drive more muscle protein synthesis.

Background

Traditional mechanical tension model emphasized maximum load to cause microtears.

He cites two studies: (1) Six-week program comparing high volume vs high load, where the high volume group had more CSA and higher muscle protein synthesis, despite using moderate loads. (2) A 2020 review of 28 studies concluding that muscle strength gains — not the absolute load — are the superior marker for hypertrophy, provided the strength is improved at moderate or heavy loads, not just light loads. This implies proximity to failure and volume are key. For the average person, chasing max lifts is less effective than accumulating volume with a challenging but manageable weight. He still recommends progressive overload and getting stronger over time, but within a moderate rep range.

the people that did the high volume work actually had more muscle cross-sectional area than the people that did the high load work.

Also said
“the higher volume group also had higher protein synthesis.”— Directly ties higher volume to increased muscle protein synthesis.
“improving your strength is number one priority. But if you are improving your strength at a moderate load or a high load, you are going to have better improvement than just improving strength under a light load.”— Qualifies that strength gains drive hypertrophy, but load matters; moderate loads are effective.

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

3 items
Proximity to failure for myofibrillar growth and myofibrillar like hypertrophy, this whole process is the most important.
Succinctly captures the foundational driver of mechanical tension-based hypertrophy: pushing close to failure.
Lactate is not just what makes us burn. ... It is one of the primary signaling devices.
Counters common gym lore that lactate is only a fatigue waste product; reframes it as a critical anabolic signal.
You don't have to do high volume all the time. ... volume spurt where you just be like, I'm going to go high volume for a couple week period of time and you get some serious growth.
Encapsulates the practical, sustainable approach to periodized high volume without chronic overreaching.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

myofibrillar-hypertrophyvolume-vs-loadhigh-volume-trainingproximity-to-failuresarcoplasmic-expansioncyclasmic-growthglycogen-supercompensationmetabolic-stressinorganic-phosphatelactate-signalingvegfigfstretch-mediated-hypertrophyintegrinspassive-tensionisometric-trainingpain-tolerancewhey-proteinmuscle-protein-synthesistime-under-tension
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.