UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
#64 – Zol Kryger, M.D.: Plastic surgery—common procedures, reducing risk, & picking the right doctor
~504 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

#64 – Zol Kryger, M.D.: Plastic surgery—common procedures, reducing risk, & picking the right doctor

Peter Attia
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

90–95% of all plastic surgery in the United States is not done by board-certified plastic surgeons — any physician with an MD can legally perform any procedure, making patient due-diligence the only real safety gate.

2

The Brazilian Butt Lift carries an estimated 1-in-1,000 mortality risk from fat embolism; textured breast implants carry a 1-in-3,000 risk of a rare lymphoma (ALCL) — both risks are poorly disclosed in cash-pay, non-hospital settings.

3

Capsular contracture (2–8% incidence after breast augmentation) is driven by bacteria, and smooth implants placed via a sub-mammary fold incision have meaningfully lower rates than textured implants through the nipple.

4

When selecting any plastic surgeon, ask: Are you board-certified in plastic surgery? Do you have hospital privileges for this procedure? What is your complication rate and how do you manage those complications — including who pays?

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

7 items

Surgeon vetting checklist before any plastic surgery procedure

WhatBefore booking any elective cosmetic procedure, ask the surgeon these five questions: (1) Are you board-certified in plastic surgery? (2) How and where did you train in this specific procedure? (3) What is your complication rate for this procedure and how do you manage complications? (4) Do you have hospital privileges for this procedure? (5) Who is financially responsible for complications — including return-to-OR and emergency room costs?
WhenBefore the first consultation, and verify answers independently (state medical board license lookup, Sunshine Act database for financial conflicts, ASPS member lookup).
For whomAnyone considering any cosmetic procedure from Botox and filler up to major body contouring surgery.
Why90–95% of US cosmetic plastic surgery is performed by non-board-certified plastic surgeons. Hospital privileges are the single best proxy for whether the surgeon has been vetted by a credentialing committee. Financial responsibility for complications is rarely discussed but can result in five-figure unexpected bills.
CaveatsBeing board-certified in another specialty (e.g., gynecology, otolaryngology) is not the same as board certification in plastic surgery. A surgeon who answers 'yes' to board certification may mean a different specialty — ask specifically: 'Board-certified in plastic surgery by the American Board of Plastic Surgery.'

Kryger notes that patients almost never ask about board certification — they ask how nice, confident, or empathetic the surgeon seems, and they weight price heavily. His own nurse, five years in his practice, chose a revision surgeon based on lower price rather than training. The Sunshine Act database (searchable online) shows every payment from pharmaceutical and device companies to physicians by name — useful to check before trusting a surgeon's opinion on implant type or device technology.

Some of the important questions are: how long have you been doing this procedure? How did you learn how to do this procedure? I would ask the person where they trained and what field they trained in. A good question to ask is: what if something bad happens to me? What's the plan? Do you have hospital privileges for this procedure?

Breast augmentation: choose smooth round silicone implant via inframammary fold incision, placed submuscular

WhatFor elective cosmetic breast augmentation: (1) use smooth (not textured) implants; (2) use round (not teardrop/anatomic) shape; (3) use cohesive silicone gel (not saline); (4) place via inframammary fold incision (beneath the breast crease) rather than periareolar or transaxillary; (5) place implant submuscular (behind the pectoral muscle) rather than subglandular.
WhenDecision made during pre-operative planning consultation, before any implants are ordered.
For whomWomen considering cosmetic breast augmentation. Teardrop/textured implants may still be appropriate in select breast reconstruction cases.
WhySmooth implants have lower bacterial adhesion (70x less vs. textured) and no ALCL risk. Inframammary fold incision bypasses the bacteria-laden nipple and areola, yielding significantly lower capsular contracture rates. Submuscular placement is supported by data showing better mammography, lower contracture rate, better support of implant weight, and better cosmetic result at the upper pole.
CaveatsSaline implants remain an acceptable choice for women who already have them and are happy — switching to silicone is not required. Teardrop implants may be appropriate in breast cancer reconstruction (where mastectomy reduces ALCL risk by cutting lymphatics and where better symmetry matching may justify use).

The textured-implant advantage in capsular contracture was a confound: European surgeons using textured teardrop implants were also using an inframammary incision that bypassed nipple flora, so the lower contracture rate was attributable to the incision, not the texture. A blinded study at a plastic surgery meeting showed surgeons correctly identified round vs. teardrop outcomes only 50% of the time — random chance — demolishing the claimed aesthetic advantage. Teardrop implants are also harder, require larger incisions, can rotate, and cost 20–25% more.

Mechanism

The inframammary fold incision is anatomically removed from the nipple-areola complex, which harbors resident bacteria in breast ducts and skin glands. Submuscular placement interposes the pectoralis major between the implant and breast parenchyma, providing compression resistance, a second bacterial barrier, and improved aesthetics at the superior pole.

I pretty much now do almost all my implants through an incision underneath the fold of the breast... and I also put most of the implants in under the muscle. There's a lot of data that supports the benefits of that — it's better for mammograms, it has a lower rate of capsular contracture, it helps support the weight of the implant.

Capsular contracture surveillance in women with existing breast implants

WhatWomen with breast implants (especially textured implants) should: (1) see their plastic surgeon at minimum annually, preferably every 6 months; (2) perform monthly self-exams to detect asymmetry, hardening, or masses; (3) consider MRI every 2–3 years to assess implant integrity; (4) report any significant swelling, hardening, or pain promptly — these are early signs of ALCL.
WhenOngoing, beginning at implant placement. Elevated vigilance for women with textured implants.
DoseAnnual surgeon visit; monthly self-exam; MRI every 2–3 years (more frequently if symptomatic).
For whomAll women with breast implants; highest-priority surveillance for women with textured implants.
WhyMost ALCL cases present first as capsular contracture, then progress to seroma and mass formation. Early detection before invasion dramatically improves prognosis. The ASPS PROFILE registry is voluntary and under-reports cases — women with textured implants are the best-positioned to catch complications early if they know what to look for.
CaveatsSaline implant rupture is obvious (rapid deflation); silicone implant rupture is often silent. MRI is superior to ultrasound for detecting silent silicone rupture. Do not rush to exchange implants if asymptomatic — manage symptoms, escalate workup only if warranted.

There is no mandatory reporting law requiring plastic surgeons to report ALCL cases to any registry. The voluntary ASPS PROFILE database mostly captures board-certified plastic surgeons, missing the large fraction of breast augmentations done by non-plastic surgeons. Women who had textured implants placed by a non-plastic surgeon are at highest risk and least likely to be followed up, because their provider may not be watching for the complication at all.

I think that these women should see their plastic surgeon at least once a year and maybe even every six months. They should be doing monthly self exams to feel for any masses. There usually are going to be other signs like significant swelling of the breasts involved, hardening of the breast — so the women tend to get capsular contracture first.

Abdominoplasty (tummy tuck) patient selection and complication management

WhatIdeal candidate: woman who has completed childbearing, is at or near ideal body weight, has excess infraumbilical skin and/or rectus diastasis. Pre-operatively confirm: (1) no plans for future pregnancy; (2) realistic expectations about scarring (high-tension incision leads to higher scar visibility risk); (3) plan for 2 surgical drains post-op to prevent seroma. Post-operatively: expect 10–15% seroma incidence; drainage is almost always manageable in the clinic.
WhenAfter completing childbearing. Diastasis repair is optimized when combined with the tummy tuck (single recovery). Hernia repair (if present) is addressed simultaneously.
DoseRecovery: typically 2–4 weeks for return to sedentary work; 6–8 weeks to full activity. Drain management: 1–2 weeks post-op.
For whomPostpartum women with skin excess and/or diastasis at stable weight. Men who have lost massive weight (5–10% of procedures); these patients typically need skin removal only, not muscle tightening.
WhySeroma (fluid accumulation in the large dead-space created by skin elevation) is the most common tummy tuck complication at 10–15%, but is highly manageable with clinic drainage. Scar quality is the dominant long-term concern — high-tension closure predicts worse scarring at the central scar, which is the highest-tension point. Doing the procedure before further pregnancies avoids undoing the muscle tightening and skin removal.
CaveatsCombining liposuction with abdominoplasty increases complication risk. Patients with high BMI are poor candidates — liposuction cannot substitute for weight loss, and weight loss through diet/exercise produces better long-term skin results. Dark-skinned and Asian patients have higher keloid risk at high-tension incision sites.

Kryger's 'Krieger test' for absolute indication: if a child asks the mother whether she is pregnant after a large meal, that is the clearest sign that diastasis and skin excess are significant enough to materially affect quality of life. Diastasis is not merely cosmetic — severely thinned fascial tissue allows intestinal movement to be visible through the skin. The diastasis repair closes the fascia (not the muscles themselves) over the midline, restoring a flat anterior abdominal wall. The hernia repair at the belly button is addressed simultaneously as a structural repair, not just a cosmetic one.

The biggest risk is fluid accumulation called the seroma after the surgery. You've created such an enormous amount of space where you've lifted up the skin that you could put easily a liter of fluid to fill in that area, and so we use drains to drain the fluid out. The incidence is about 10% to 15%.

Also said
“I joke that the absolute indication for a tummy tuck is if one of your children asks you if you're having another baby after a large meal — we call that the Krieger test.”— Provides a memorable heuristic for when diastasis is functionally significant enough to justify surgery.

Liposuction safety limits: maximum 5 liters (large-volume threshold) and lidocaine toxicity monitoring

WhatSafe liposuction volume limit is approximately 5 liters (just over 10 pounds of fat) in a single session — beyond this is 'large-volume liposuction' and the risks escalate significantly. The tumescent fluid (lidocaine + epinephrine) injected to numb the area reaches peak blood levels 8–12 hours after the procedure — after the patient is home — making lidocaine toxicity calculation and patient monitoring critical.
WhenThese limits and monitoring requirements apply to every liposuction case. Multi-session staged approaches are safer for large-volume removal.
DoseMaximum single-session: 5 liters. Lidocaine toxicity window: 8–12 hours post-procedure (when patient is already home). Surgeon must calculate total lidocaine dose against body weight before the case.
For whomApplies to every liposuction patient. Key risk factor: procedures done in office-based settings without anesthesia monitoring, where providers may not calculate tumescent fluid volumes carefully.
WhyLarge-volume liposuction drives fluid shifts that cause volume overload and pulmonary edema. Lidocaine is injected in large quantities to numb the tissue; peak serum levels occur well after the procedure ends and the patient has left the facility. If dose calculations are wrong, cardiac arrhythmia and neurological toxicity occur at home with no monitoring.
CaveatsLiposuction removes only subcutaneous fat, not visceral fat. Overweight patients who expect liposuction to drive weight loss are poor candidates — 15 lbs removed surgically is inferior to 15 lbs lost through diet and exercise (better skin retraction, better metabolic outcomes, equivalent or lower cost). CoolSculpting and radiofrequency lipolysis devices carry their own risks (burns, contour irregularities) and have modest evidence of effectiveness.

Kryger personally avoids large-volume liposuction: 'I try to avoid very large volume liposuction — that's where it becomes risky, where you're trying to suck up more than about ten pounds of fat at a time.' In unregulated settings, providers routinely remove 20–30 pounds in marathon 8-hour sessions; this is where the fluid-shift deaths and electrolyte crises occur. The cannula can also penetrate the diaphragm and enter the thorax (pneumothorax) or penetrate the abdominal wall into bowel when anatomic awareness lapses — these complications have been documented even in thin patients.

Five liters, which is you know slightly over ten pounds, is what's considered large volume liposuction, and that's where the risks really go way up. Lidocaine toxicity — it takes about 8–12 hours as a delay after the liposuction for peak levels of these substances in the bloodstream, and so you're done with a procedure after a couple hours, patient recovers for another hour, they're home — so these levels are occurring at home.

Brazilian Butt Lift risk reduction: table position and injection depth

WhatTo reduce the risk of inadvertent intravenous fat injection during BBL: (1) position the patient in a 30-degree 'beach chair' flexion rather than flat prone — this changes gluteal vascular anatomy relative to surface landmarks; (2) inject fat superficially into the subcutaneous plane rather than deep intramuscularly; (3) use smaller injection volumes per pass; (4) operate at a lower annual volume (high-volume BBL factories lose anatomic discipline).
WhenPre-operative OR setup and intraoperative technique for every BBL case.
For whomSurgeons performing BBL; patients evaluating BBL providers should ask about table position protocol and annual volume.
WhyThe gluteal venous plexus is deep and runs alongside the fat compartment being injected. Table position modifies the depth of these vessels relative to surface anatomy. Deep intramuscular injection is the mechanism by which fat enters gluteal veins and embolizes to the lungs. Risk scales with injection depth and volume per pass.
CaveatsEven with optimal technique, the 1-in-1,000 fatal fat embolism risk cannot be eliminated with current techniques. The plastic surgery societies have discussed a moratorium on the procedure. This is an elective procedure with the highest per-procedure mortality risk in cosmetic surgery.

Kryger performs 20–30 per year — surgeons in Miami perform 4–5 per day and some do 7–8. At that volume, 'you cannot be maintaining the attention to anatomical detail that this procedure demands.' The USA Today expose on Miami BBL clinics documented deaths at facilities owned by non-physicians with criminal records, where unlicensed individuals were involved in performing the procedures. In Florida, until recent legislative changes, there were no restrictions on non-physician ownership of surgical facilities or on the credentials of physicians working there.

How you bend the surgical table with the patient laying prone on their stomach is gonna affect the position of the blood vessels relative to the surface anatomy. So if you have the patient laying flat as opposed to bending the bed 30 degrees where it's in sort of a beach chair type position — that's gonna change the position of the anatomy. Understanding anatomy is really the key.

Screening for body dysmorphic disorder before surgery: the SIMON acronym and red flag checklist

WhatBefore operating on any patient, screen for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) using the SIMON acronym (Single Immature Male Overly Narcissistic) and the red flag checklist: (1) prior bad-mouthing of multiple previous surgeons; (2) history of multiple procedures without satisfaction; (3) social or functional impairment attributed to the targeted body part; (4) disproportionate distress relative to objective appearance. Defer surgery and refer to psychiatry when BDD is suspected.
WhenEvery new patient consultation, before any surgical booking.
For whomAll plastic surgeons and any physicians considering cosmetic procedures. The SIMON profile most commonly presents for rhinoplasty and body contouring.
WhyBDD patients will not be satisfied by surgery regardless of technical outcome. Operating on them escalates their fixation, exposes the surgeon to disproportionate litigation, and does active harm to the patient. The economic temptation is real — these patients are willing to pay for multiple procedures — but the ethical obligation is to refer, not operate.
CaveatsNot every patient with prior unsatisfactory outcomes has BDD — botched work exists. The diagnostic signal is the pattern of blaming every prior surgeon combined with disproportionate distress. A single bad previous outcome, especially if performed by a non-plastic surgeon, is not a contraindication.

Kryger turns away 1–2 patients per day primarily because he does not believe surgery will help them. The most common turned-away case: overweight patients presenting liposuction as a weight-loss solution. He explains the ceiling on subcutaneous fat removal, the loose-skin risk, and the fact that 15 lbs lost through diet and exercise produces superior outcomes to 15 lbs suctioned. His closing pitch: 'Let's sit together right now and talk about how you could take the same amount of money, get a gym membership, hire a nutritionist, change your eating — you're gonna very easily lose 15 pounds that I would suck off, and you're going to be healthier, you're gonna look better.'

SIMON — it stands for single, immature, male, overly narcissistic. The Simon is a young guy, he's single, he's not been married, and oftentimes it's his nose or some other body part and he basically cannot function: 'My life, I can't go outside, I can't date, no women want to talk to me because of this body part.' It doesn't take long to understand that guy should not have surgery — he needs counseling.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

5 items

90–95% of US plastic surgery is performed by non-plastic surgeons — legally

~22 min

Any physician holding an MD degree can legally perform any procedure, including breast augmentation and liposuction, with no further training required. Only hospital credentialing bodies police this — and most cosmetic procedures are done in private surgery centers that bypass hospital oversight entirely.

Why this matters: Most patients assume board certification is required to perform a procedure by law. It is not. The default safety system does not exist in the cash-pay cosmetic surgery market.

Background

Hospitals are effective at self-policing: they credential only trained physicians for each procedure category. But roughly 80–95% of cosmetic plastic surgery in the US happens outside hospital walls in private surgery centers or office settings.

Kryger describes colleagues in his Los Angeles-area community — OB-GYNs, ER physicians, family practice doctors, and internal medicine doctors — who begin with Botox, add a laser, then progress to liposuction and breast augmentation. None of this is legally prohibited once they hold an MD. The patients most at risk are price-sensitive patients who do not know to ask whether the doctor trained as a plastic surgeon. Kryger's own nurse — who had been watching him work for five years — still chose to have a revision with a cheaper, less-qualified surgeon: 'Even in my community here in the Greater Los Angeles area hundreds and hundreds of physicians of all walks — gynaecologists, ER doctors, general surgeons, family practice doctors, internal medicine — who have no training or no knowledge whatsoever just decide I'm gonna start doing Botox.'

The numbers are probably 90 to 95 percent of all plastic surgery done in the United States is not done by board certified plastic surgeons. So only a small minority is actually done by plastic surgeons — which is mind-boggling to me.

Textured breast implants carry a 1-in-3,000 risk of ALCL lymphoma — not 1-in-300,000 as originally stated

~42 min

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), a rare cancer of the capsule surrounding the implant, occurs only in textured implants. The risk was initially reported as 1 in 300,000 but has since been revised upward to approximately 1 in 3,000 for certain textured implant brands. European regulators pulled most textured implants from market; the US FDA chose to keep them available.

Why this matters: A 100-fold underestimate of cancer risk was disclosed to women for years, driven partly by industry-funded research from surgeons financially incentivized to endorse textured implants.

Background

Textured implants were marketed as having lower capsular contracture rates — an advantage Kryger argues was a confound (it was the incision location, not the texture). Their higher price also generated higher surgeon margin, creating a financial incentive for industry-funded studies to find in their favor.

Kryger attended a plastic surgery panel where a Canadian surgeon, Elizabeth Hall-Finley, projected a single slide from the Sunshine Act database showing how much money each pro-textured panelist had received from implant companies — ranging from $150,000 to $3 million — then walked off stage without saying a word. A bacterial adhesion study found bacteria stick 70 times more readily to textured surfaces than smooth ones, which is mechanistically consistent with the higher ALCL and capsular contracture rates. The teardrop-shaped implants that were 100% textured have now been largely abandoned: a blinded study showed plastic surgeons could correctly identify round vs. teardrop-shaped results only 50% of the time — random chance.

Initially we were telling women the incidence was maybe one in 300,000. Now they know that with certain implants it's actually one in 3,000.

Also said
“The bacteria are 70 times more able to stick to the textured implant than to the smooth implant.”— Mechanistic explanation for why textured implants drive both higher capsular contracture and higher ALCL rates — and why the industry claim of lower contracture rates was a confound.

Capsular contracture is primarily bacterial in origin — and incision location is the dominant modifiable risk factor

~47 min

Capsular contracture (2–8% incidence) is driven by bacterial seeding at the time of surgery. The sub-mammary fold incision bypasses the bacteria-rich nipple and areola, yielding significantly lower contracture rates than periareolar or transaxillary incisions. Hematoma is a major risk amplifier: blood provides an excellent bacterial growth medium.

Why this matters: Surgeons who place implants through the nipple are systematically delivering higher bacterial inocula to the implant pocket, yet this is still a common approach. Incision choice is a controllable variable that most patients never know to ask about.

Background

Capsular contracture was originally attributed to foreign-body reaction generically. The bacterial hypothesis has been supported by studies showing the capsules in both ALCL and contracture cases are full of bacteria, and by the transmission reduction when bypassing nipple flora.

Kryger has followed thousands of his own patients and found significantly lower contracture rates when using the inframammary fold incision. He now strongly advises against periareolar and transaxillary incisions: 'An incision through the armpit or through the nipple — you're making an incision in a location where there are more bacteria, and you're cutting through nerves both in the armpit and in the nipple, and studies show that there is a higher rate of pain and numbness and issues associated with going through those two sites.' The other key risk amplifier is early hematoma: blood is an excellent culture medium for the bacteria that seed at insertion, so early bleeding dramatically increases late contracture probability.

We think bacteria are the culprit — meaning bacteria are leading to an aggravated response. I've followed data on thousands of women and we found that we definitely have a lower rate of capsular contracture when we go through an incision made underneath the fold of the breast as opposed to the nipple.

Also said
“A woman who has a small hematoma, a small amount of bleeding on one breast — that woman has a significantly higher risk of developing capsular contracture. The reason is probably that that blood that's bathing the implant is a great medium for bacteria to grow in.”— Quantifies why managing early bleeding is as important as incision choice in preventing the most common long-term complication.

The Brazilian Butt Lift has an estimated 1-in-1,000 fatality rate from fat embolism

~2 h 05 min

BBL works by liposuctioning fat from one part of the body and injecting it into the gluteal region. The gluteal venous plexus is dense; inadvertent intra-venous injection transports fat to the lungs, causing fat embolism syndrome, which has caused multiple deaths. Autopsy series uniformly find lungs full of fat. The mortality rate is approximately 1 in 1,000 — one of the highest per-procedure mortality rates in elective surgery.

Why this matters: Despite this mortality rate, some surgeons in Miami perform 4–5 BBLs per day. The USA Today exposé on Miami clinics documented multiple deaths and ongoing patient demand, driven by price competition and celebrity-fueled demand.

Background

Social media (particularly the Kim Kardashian aesthetic) drove massive demand increases in the 2010s. The procedure is disproportionately performed in Florida, Brazil, and Central America, with lower regulatory oversight.

Kryger's own volume is 20–30 per year; Miami-based surgeons may do four to five per day, and some individuals he knows do seven to eight daily. At that volume, safety protocols cannot be maintained. The anatomical risk: the patient prone on the OR table in a flat position changes the depth of the gluteal venous plexus relative to surface anatomy. Bending the table 30 degrees (beach chair) moves the vessels deeper and reduces inadvertent cannulation risk — but this detail of table position requires formal surgical training to know. The plastic surgery societies have discussed placing a moratorium on the procedure.

It's injecting fat into the butt to enlarge it... the issue is inadvertently injecting fat into the veins in the butt, and then the fat gets transported to the lungs and causes a fat embolus which has a high risk of fatality. When they autopsy these patients they uniformly find their lungs full of fat.

Also said
“What are the stated risks of a fat embolus from this procedure — would probably be one in a thousand would be the risk, maybe even higher.”— Kryger's direct risk disclosure figure — and he acknowledges it may be an underestimate because non-fatal fat emboli often go undetected.

Filler blindness: 25 reported cases of permanent vision loss from retrograde arterial injection

~2 h 50 min

Dermal fillers injected near the nose, forehead, or between the eyebrows can enter the angular artery or supraorbital artery and travel retrograde to the retinal artery, causing irreversible blindness. At least 25 cases have been reported. This risk is not widely communicated in the spa and medspa settings where the majority of filler is now injected.

Why this matters: Fillers are perceived as completely benign because there is no incision and no operating room. The blindness risk from a single injection near the nose or forehead is real, permanent, and often treated outside any hospital setting with no emergency protocol.

Kryger frames this as the 'no free lunch' principle: 'If something has no risk, no recovery, no downtime, low cost — it has no result.' The same principle applies to PRP 'vampire facials': multiple HIV transmissions have been documented from clinics using inadequately cleaned harvesting equipment contaminated with blood from an HIV-positive previous patient. Permanent pigment damage from incorrectly calibrated lasers and chemical peels rounds out the minimally-invasive risk profile. The common denominator is unlicensed or undertrained operators in cash-pay, non-hospital settings.

We've seen probably 25 reported cases of blindness from filler injected near the eyes — one of the most popular procedures. The filler enters into an artery and gets transported retrograde and then flows into the retinal artery and obstructs the retinal artery and causes blindness.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

4 items

ASPS (American Society of Plastic Surgeons) member lookup — asps.org

Service

The ASPS website provides a board-certified plastic surgeon locator, procedure risk summaries, and patient education materials — the most accessible starting point for patient due diligence before any cosmetic procedure.

Kryger specifically recommends the ASPS website as a resource for patients to understand both procedure risks and surgeon qualifications. It also links to the ASPS PROFILE registry for implant surveillance. This does not substitute for checking the state medical board for license status and malpractice history, or for the Sunshine Act database for financial conflicts of interest.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons has a great website. It talks about every procedure, it talks about the risks of every procedure. But just to be knowledgeable going in — knowledge is power in these things.

Find ASPS

Sunshine Act database (CMS Open Payments) — openpaymentsdata.cms.gov

Tool

A federal database showing every payment made by pharmaceutical and device companies to physicians — from $10 to millions. Use it to check whether your surgeon has received payments from implant manufacturers before trusting their implant recommendations.

Kryger describes a Canadian surgeon, Elizabeth Hall-Finley, projecting Sunshine Act data at a plastic surgery conference to expose that every pro-textured-implant panelist had received $150,000 to $3 million from implant companies. The database is publicly searchable by physician name and company. Kryger's own principle: 'When you have a vested interest in the result of a study showing something, and you will lose money if something else comes out of it, you can't trust yourself — there's just such an errant bias in that.'

She had a website called the Sunshine Act which essentially shows how much money every doctor in America has been paid — all the way from ten dollars up to millions of dollars from industry. She had the names of the doctors and the amounts of money... she just put up the slide and then she just walked off.

Find Sunshine

Pre-operative honesty about complications: disclose and bundle complication costs

Practice

Patients should explicitly ask their surgeon before any procedure: (1) what is your complication rate for this specific procedure; (2) what is your protocol when a complication occurs; and (3) who is financially responsible — specifically, are return-to-OR costs bundled in your fee, and what happens if I need to go to the emergency room?

Kryger's practice has its own fully-accredited OR suite, so return-to-OR for bleeding or other early complications is included in the surgical fee with no additional patient cost. Surgeons without their own accredited facility cannot provide this — a patient who develops a hematoma after a procedure in an office setting may face emergency room bills they were never warned about. Kryger also distinguishes between surgeon-caused complications (corrected at no charge) and patient dissatisfaction with a result that was technically within normal variation (partial cost sharing). Research cited by Attia confirms that patients sue in proportion to lack of communication and perceived arrogance after a complication — not in proportion to the objective severity of the error.

What happens if there's a problem — do you have hospital privileges for this procedure? Because if a complication requires a return to the operating room and the surgeon doesn't have their own facility, the patient is on the hook for that cost — absolutely 100%.

Find Pre-operative

Two-surgeon model for complex cases

Practice

Kryger operates most cases alongside his brother (also a plastic surgeon trained at a separate program), functioning as a two-attending team. This model, unusual in cosmetic surgery, produces redundant checking and complementary skill strengths that reduce errors.

Kryger describes the trade-off explicitly: he is faster and more decisive; his brother is slower and more methodical. Together, his speed prevents the paralysis and 12-hour cases that extend anesthesia exposure and risk, while his brother's methodical nature prevents corner-cutting as fatigue builds at the end of long cases. Attia had observed a breast augmentation and hernia repair being done as a two-attending case and was struck by how rare that is for what most surgeons consider a routine procedure. The aviation analogy: two pilots on every commercial flight, even though each can fly alone. Studies show complication rates fall as surgical time falls — a strong argument for operating efficiently rather than slowly.

There's a reason why two pilots fly the plane. Each one knows how to do it alone, but when there's another person double-checking everything you do and offering a slightly different view and opinion, it makes a world of difference.

Find Two-surgeon

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
The numbers are probably 90 to 95 percent of all plastic surgery done in the United States is not done by board certified plastic surgeons. So only a small minority is actually done by plastic surgeons — which is mind-boggling to me.
The single most important patient-safety fact in the episode, and the most counterintuitive: most patients assume regulatory oversight exists where it does not.
Initially we were telling women the incidence was maybe one in 300,000. Now they know that with certain implants it's actually one in 3,000.
A 100-fold revision of cancer risk disclosure — driven in part by industry-funded research from surgeons financially conflicted in the result.
The Brazilian Butt Lift — the issue is inadvertently injecting fat into the veins in the butt, and then the fat gets transported to the lungs and causes a fat embolus which has a high risk of fatality. When they autopsy these patients they uniformly find their lungs full of fat.
The clearest single-sentence description of why the most in-demand cosmetic procedure of the 2010s is also one of the most dangerous in all of elective surgery.
If something has no risk, no recovery, no downtime, low cost — it has no result. That's just a rule.
Kryger's universal heuristic for evaluating any minimally-invasive cosmetic treatment — fillers, lasers, CoolSculpting, PRP facials. Applies to every lunchtime-procedure category.
We've seen probably 25 reported cases of blindness from filler injected near the eyes — one of the most popular procedures. The filler enters into an artery and gets transported retrograde and then flows into the retinal artery and obstructs the retinal artery and causes blindness.
Permanent blindness is not a risk most patients associate with a filler appointment. The retinal artery occlusion pathway is specific, real, and irreversible.
A surgeon knows how to take care of any complication they create.
Kryger's litmus test for surgical competence: not just the ability to perform a procedure, but the training to recognize, manage, and cover the costs of complications when they occur.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

board-certification-plastic-surgerysurgeon-selection-criteriabreast-augmentationcapsular-contracturealcl-lymphoma-breast-implantstextured-vs-smooth-implantssilicone-vs-saline-implantsinframammary-fold-incisionabdominoplasty-tummy-tuckdiastasis-repairseroma-managementliposuction-complicationslarge-volume-liposuction-safetylidocaine-toxicitybrazilian-butt-liftfat-embolismfiller-blindnessbody-dysmorphic-disorderhospital-privileges-verificationplastic-surgery-regulation
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.