Time is the ultimate non-renewable asset; buying hours matters more than buying things. Start delegating at zero cost with friend swaps or a $20/month ChatGPT coach to reclaim cognitive load.
2
Jonathan Swanson built a team of six assistants over a decade, reaching 'time abundance.' He outlines a delegation hierarchy (task → process → goal → clairvoyant) and the four sins: pride, guilt, selfishness, lack of commitment.
3
Ambition grows linearly with leverage—offloading urgent tasks frees willpower for higher-order goals. Historical giants from Cicero to Edison all relied on assistants.
4
Practical protocols: offload pain tasks first, delegate by voice for speed and richer feedback, and create a 'freedom phone' with only essentials to break passive phone addiction.
Protocols
Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why
8 items
Offload pain tasks first
WhatMake a list of all monotonous, energy-draining tasks you dislike (inbox, calendar, bills, passport renewal) and delegate those before anything else.
WhenAs the very first step when you get an assistant or start delegating.
DoseThis phase may take up to a year to fully offload all pain tasks.
For whomBeginner delegators, anyone feeling overwhelmed by life admin.
WhyThese tasks sap willpower and cognitive energy without requiring creativity; removing them reduces chronic cognitive weight, freeing the mind for higher-order goals.
CaveatsDon't expect instant results; it's a gradual process. You must tolerate initial inefficiency.
Swanson advises that most people start delegation wrong by trying to chase big aspirations immediately. Instead, they should first clear the 'cognitive debt' of mundane, repetitive tasks. These are things like renewing a passport, paying bills, managing inbox and calendar—tasks that don't require creativity but create a constant background stress. He likens chronic to-dos to inflammation: they impair the mind just as inflammation damages the body. By offloading these, you effectively upgrade your mental operating system. Once the pain tasks are handled, you naturally have more energy and space to think about planning, goals, and aspirations—the things that actually give life meaning. He emphasizes that this is not a one-week fix; it's a new way of living that compounds over years.
Mechanism
Chronic unfinished tasks create open loops that consume working memory and willpower. Offloading them to an assistant acts as a 'cognitive prosthetic,' externalizing the burden and freeing prefrontal cortex resources for higher-order thinking.
Personal experience
Swanson's own team handles all such tasks for him, and he jokes that he doesn't care if his DMV-waiting skills atrophy.
You start with pain, unload all these monotonous things. And then once you do that, then you start chasing your aspirations.
Also said
“Assistance like a cognitive prosthetic for remembering, planning, sequencing. And just like inflammation damages your body and health, chronic to-dos damages or impairs your mind.”— Provides the analogy that underpins the rationale.
“For most beginner delegators, they start by delegating things that sap energy and that are monotonous and annoying. That's renewing a passport or a driver's license. It's calendar. It's inbox. It's paying bills.”— Gives concrete examples of pain tasks.
Delegate by voice instead of text
WhatUse voice notes (e.g., WhatsApp voice messages, Voxer) to delegate tasks and give feedback, rather than typing.
WhenWhenever you need to delegate a task or provide feedback, especially when on the move.
DoseAim to make voice your primary delegation channel; Swanson did it almost exclusively for a year.
For whomAnyone delegating to an assistant, especially those who struggle to give detailed written feedback.
WhyVoice is 3–5x faster than typing, can be done between meetings or at the gym, and feels less arduous. It also enables richer, more frequent feedback because you can just talk through your thoughts.
CaveatsSome people feel awkward with voice notes initially; it takes practice. Ensure your assistant is comfortable with voice messages.
Swanson ranks delegation methods by effectiveness: thumbs (phone typing) is worst, fingers (email) is better, voice is best. He explains that voice removes the friction of composing text, which often leads to abbreviated, less clear instructions. When you voice-note, you naturally include more context, tone, and nuance. This is critical for feedback: if you have to type a page of notes, you won't do it; but you can talk for a minute while walking in the park. He observed that the top 1% of delegators at Athena all use voice constantly, all day long. It also speeds up the iteration cycle—you can fire off a quick correction immediately rather than waiting to sit down and type. The host added that voice feels less like 'work' and more like just thinking out loud, which lowers the barrier to delegating in the first place.
Personal experience
Swanson tried delegating almost exclusively through voice for a full year and found it transformative; he now uses it constantly.
The best way to delegate is by voice where instead of typing things you voice note. And voice is way more powerful than other mechanisms of delegating because you can talk three to five times faster.
Also said
“If you look at the top delegators at Athena, they all delegate by voice constantly, just all day long.”— Social proof from high-performing users.
“The way you give better feedback is because you do it by voice. Because if you have to type up a page of notes, you're just not going to do it. But if you can just be like, 'Hey, here's what I liked,' and you talk about it as you walk in the park and you talk all day long.”— Explains why voice improves feedback quality and frequency.
Create a freedom phone
WhatTake an old phone, delete all apps except bare essentials (Uber, phone calls), ban all news, social media, and crypto checking, and have someone else set a restrictions code so you cannot unlock it. Carry this phone outside the house.
WhenWhenever you leave the house, to prevent passive phone use during the day.
DoseOngoing lifestyle change; use the freedom phone as your daily carry.
For whomAnyone struggling with phone addiction or excessive screen time, especially those who find app timers ineffective.
WhyPassive phone checking (notifications, doomscrolling) wastes brain power and fragments attention. Making it physically impossible to access distracting apps is the only thing that worked for Swanson.
CaveatsYou need a second phone (or repurpose an old one). If you can't afford two phones, make your main phone the 'kale phone' by deleting all distracting apps and keeping them only on your computer. Also, the freedom phone won't have messaging apps, so you may miss non-urgent messages until you're back at your computer.
Swanson tried Apple's Screen Time feature and found it useless because it's too easy to ignore. His solution was environmental design: when he upgraded his phone, he kept the old one and turned it into a 'freedom phone.' He stripped it down to only Uber and phone calls, and blocked all news sites, crypto prices, and other distractions. Crucially, he gave his wife the restrictions passcode, so he literally cannot bypass the blocks. He carries this phone when out of the house. He distinguishes between active phone use (calling a friend) which he doesn't mind, and passive, unconscious checking, which he sees as toxic. The host added a variation: use the old phone as the freedom phone and keep the new phone at home on Wi-Fi only, so the freedom phone has the SIM card and works outside, while the 'cocaine phone' stays tethered. Swanson also mentioned a friend who killed his phone entirely and only carried a laptop, which was extreme but effective.
Mechanism
By removing the ability to engage in distracting behaviors, you break the habit loop of cue → routine → reward. The friction of having no access rewires the brain's expectation of instant gratification.
Personal experience
Swanson has used this setup and says it's the only intervention that worked for him. He no longer passively checks his phone.
I've gone so far that I've banned all news sites checking the price of crypto, all sorts of other stuff. And my wife has the code, so I literally can't unlock it. So, this freedom phone I call is what I take out of the house with me.
Also said
“What I don't like is just like passively picking up the phone to check notifications. That's just a waste of brain power and shouldn't be doing. And this freedom phone that's totally locked down has solved that for me.”— Clarifies the specific behavior he targets.
“If you don't have the money to buy a second phone or to use an old phone, just make your main phone the Kale phone. Just don't have any of that stuff on it and have it on your computer.”— Offers a zero-cost alternative.
Export your personal algorithm when delegating
WhatInstead of delegating a one-line task, provide a step-by-step process of how you typically do it, including preferences, tools, and criteria.
WhenWhenever you delegate a recurring task or process (e.g., planning dinner parties, gift-giving, meal prep).
DoseDo this every time you hand off a process; refine the algorithm iteratively after each execution.
For whomIntermediate delegators moving from task delegation to process delegation.
WhyAssistants lack your context; exporting your internal algorithm gives them a clear blueprint, dramatically improving output quality and reducing back-and-forth.
CaveatsIt takes practice to articulate tacit knowledge. You have far more context than you realize, and you won't export it all on day one—it compounds over months and years.
Swanson contrasts novice delegation ('plan a dinner party for me in Austin') with advanced delegation where you specify: 6–8 people, variety of guests, where you find invites, what kinds of companies or interests to look for. This is analogous to 'context engineering' in AI—models are smart but lack context, so you must pipe in all relevant information. The same applies to human assistants. He emphasizes that you possess a million times more context than you think, and it's your job to extract and communicate it. This is why delegation compounds: you can't transfer everything on day one, but over years of working together, the assistant builds a rich model of your preferences. The process level of delegation is where you create and continuously refine these algorithms. He notes that people with engineering mindsets do this naturally, but others must learn it deliberately.
The better way to delegate would be to say, 'Hey, when I have dinner parties, here's what I like them to be. I want to be six to eight people. I want there to be a variety. Here's where I go to find party invites. I go look for people who have this sort of company or these sorts of interests.' You basically create an algorithm or a process the person can follow step by step.
Also said
“In AI world there's this concept of context engineering that's become very popular to make the models more performant. You have to pipe in all the context cuz the models are very smart but they don't have context. And the same is true with delegating to an assistant.”— Links the practice to a familiar AI concept.
“What's nonobvious is that you have a million times more context than you could possibly realize and it's just sitting there and it takes practice to export that.”— Highlights the hidden depth of personal context.
Give detailed, timely, and constant feedback
WhatProvide specific, immediate feedback on every delegated task: what you liked, what you want changed, and why. Do this constantly, not occasionally.
WhenImmediately after reviewing a completed task, and continuously throughout the partnership.
DoseOngoing; aim to give feedback on every single task in the beginning, tapering only when the assistant internalizes your preferences.
For whomAll delegators, especially those frustrated by inconsistent results.
WhyVague feedback ('good job' or 'not great') doesn't help. Specific, timely feedback trains the assistant rapidly and builds the relationship. Top assistants emerge from clients who invest heavily in feedback.
CaveatsFeedback must be encouraging and supportive, not harsh. You have to be willing to make someone slightly uncomfortable to help them improve. It takes extra work upfront.
Swanson identifies lack of detailed feedback as a major reason delegation fails. Most people don't give enough feedback, and when they do, it's too vague. Effective feedback is extremely specific ('I liked this because you were super fast and detailed X, Y, Z') and timely (given right after the task). He notes that the best assistants at Athena are not randomly talented; they work for the clients who are best at delegating—those who constantly export their thinking, give praise and recognition, correct mistakes constructively, and build up the assistant's confidence. This is a two-way investment. He frames it as a marriage: both parties must be all-in. If you just want to show up and have everything perfect without investing in the partnership, it won't work. The host added that this mirrors any high-performance relationship.
Personal experience
Swanson has worked with the same assistant for over a decade; she knows everything about him because of this continuous feedback loop.
Helpful feedback is very specific and it's very timely. It's hey this task you did I liked because you were super fast, you were detailed XYZ or hey next time I'd like you to do this differently and be very specific. So that's just the most like you need to be doing it constantly.
Also said
“If you look at the best assistants at Athena, the kind of top 1%, they just so happen to work for the clients who are the best at delegating. Not a coincidence. They've become so good because the client is so good at exporting their thinking, giving feedback, praise and recognition.”— Shows the causal link between client feedback and assistant excellence.
Use ChatGPT as a $20/month coach
WhatPrompt ChatGPT to check in with you daily on a specific habit (e.g., exercise), ask if you did it, and provide a weekly report card.
WhenDaily, as a low-cost entry point to delegation before hiring a human.
DoseSet it up once and let it run; $20/month subscription.
For whomAnyone who can't yet afford a human assistant but wants to start building delegation skills.
WhyIt teaches the fundamentals of delegation (prompt engineering, offloading accountability) at minimal cost, and provides consistent accountability.
CaveatsChatGPT is limited in what it can proactively do; it won't anticipate needs like a human. It's a stepping stone, not a replacement.
Swanson positions ChatGPT as the second rung on the delegation ladder (after free friend swaps). He suggests using it like a coach: 'Every day ask me if I've exercised and check in with me and give me a report card at the end of the week.' This offloads the mental burden of self-tracking and creates external accountability. He notes that prompt engineering is essentially delegation—you're learning to give clear instructions, provide context, and iterate. This skill transfers directly to managing human assistants later. While ChatGPT can't yet proactively watch your screen and suggest tasks (though Swanson's team is building that internally), it's a powerful, accessible training ground.
If you want to exercise more you can go to chatpt and say every day ask me if I've exercised and check in with me and give me a report card at the end of the week. It can do that 20 bucks a month. You'll learn how to leverage it more and more over time.
Also said
“People talk about prompt engineering. That's just delegation.”— Frames AI prompting as delegation practice.
Group delegation with friends (zero-cost leverage)
WhatForm a small group of friends and rotate responsibilities: e.g., each person babysits one night a week, or each hosts a dinner party once a quarter.
WhenWhenever you need support but have no budget for paid help.
DoseOngoing arrangement; adjust frequency as needed.
For whomAnyone, especially parents or those wanting more social connection.
WhyCreates leverage through cooperation without money. You get three nights of free babysitting for every one night you work, or monthly dinner parties while only hosting quarterly.
CaveatsRequires reliable, like-minded friends. Coordination overhead exists but is minimal compared to the benefit.
Swanson calls this 'level zero' delegation. The babysitting swap is his go-to example: four families, each takes one night a week, everyone gets three nights off. For socializing, a dinner party rotation means each person plans and hosts once a quarter, but the group enjoys a monthly gathering. This costs nothing and builds the muscle of organizing, coordinating, and trusting others to handle something you'd normally do yourself. It's a low-stakes way to experience the power of leverage. He emphasizes that this is where everyone should start, regardless of income.
If you don't have a single dollar to spend on an assistant, you can get a group of four friends together and say, 'Hey, let's all babysit each other's kids one night a week while you just got a free babysitter for those other three nights.'
Also said
“You get together and you say, 'Hey, I want to meet more friends in dinner parties. I'll plan one dinner party once a quarter.' If these other friends, you also do it once a quarter. And now you get a monthly dinner party, making new friends, and you're only doing a couple times a year.”— Extends the concept to social leverage.
Build trust gradually with your assistant
WhatStart with limited access (e.g., calendar, email) and grant more access (bank accounts, sensitive info) only after months or years of proven trust.
WhenFrom day one of the assistant relationship, and progressively over time.
DosePace depends on your comfort; Swanson took over a decade to give one assistant full access.
For whomAnyone hesitant to delegate due to privacy or control concerns.
WhyOvercomes the fear of losing control. You don't have to hand over everything immediately; trust compounds like any other asset.
CaveatsYou must eventually give up some control to get leverage. Going too slow can limit the assistant's effectiveness.
Swanson addresses the 'lack of control and trust' blocker directly. He advises against giving bank account access on day one. Instead, start with inbox and calendar, then expand as the assistant proves reliable. He shares that his longest-tenured assistant (over a decade) now has access to everything, but that level of trust took years to build. The key is to go at your own pace—you don't have to move faster than you're comfortable with. However, he warns that some control must be relinquished; it's the price of leverage. This gradual approach makes delegation feel safer and more manageable.
Personal experience
Swanson has worked with one assistant for over a decade; she now has access to nearly everything, but it was a slow build.
Don't give your bank account access on day one. Uh you start with more limited access and then you grant more and more access over time. I worked with you know one of my assistants for over a decade and she has basically access to everything but that takes a long time to build that trust.
What's new
Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions
6 items
Time is the most fundamental pillar of health
Swanson argues that time sovereignty is upstream of sleep, exercise, and nutrition—people don't sleep poorly because they don't want to, but because they lack time.
Why this matters: Inverts the popular health hierarchy (sleep → exercise → nutrition) by placing time control as the true foundation.
Background
Common health advice treats sleep as the bedrock, but Swanson observed that even motivated people fail at sleep because of time pressure from work and family.
Swanson contends that the reason people neglect sleep, exercise, or healthy eating is not a lack of knowledge or desire, but a chronic time deficit. They work late, try to squeeze in family time, and sacrifice sleep. Therefore, the most impactful health intervention is gaining sovereignty over your schedule. He ties this to his own journey: for most of his life he felt time scarcity, and only after building a team of assistants did he experience 'time abundance,' which naturally improved his health behaviors. This reframes delegation not as a productivity hack but as a health imperative. The downstream effects are automatic: when you control your time, you can protect sleep, then exercise, then nutrition—the classic pillars fall into place.
Personal experience
Swanson describes feeling time scarcity for most of his life until layering on assistants eventually gave him a feeling of time abundance, allowing him to think about new aspirations and take better care of himself.
Time is actually the most fundamental pillar of health. And learning to control your time and getting sovereignty up, right, is how you then unlock good sleep and everything else that follows.
Also said
“Why do people not sleep much? It's not cuz they don't want to. It's cuz they don't have time. Uh they're working too late. They want to spend time with the kids.”— Explains the causal chain from time scarcity to poor sleep.
Ambition grows with leverage, not the reverse
Contrary to the assumption that ambitious people seek leverage, Swanson found that offloading tasks creates cognitive space that actually expands ambition.
Why this matters: Challenges the 'great man' narrative—leverage is not a reward for ambition but a catalyst for it.
Background
The typical view is that highly ambitious individuals naturally build teams and delegate. Swanson's coaching data at Athena revealed the opposite pattern.
Swanson explains that when people are overwhelmed by life—drowning in urgent tasks—their ambition narrows to mere survival through the next 24 hours. They have no mental bandwidth to consider bigger goals. As they offload cognitive load to an assistant, they free up space to think about higher aspirations. He observed this in his own life: during the most stressful periods at his first company, Thumbtack, he was purely focused on immediate challenges with no room for new ambitions. As he gained more leverage over time, his ambition expanded—he started considering new companies, bigger projects, and deeper relationships. This creates a positive feedback loop: more leverage → more ambition → more motivation to seek even more leverage. The practical implication is that delegation isn't just for executing existing goals; it's a prerequisite for discovering what you truly want.
Personal experience
Swanson recounts that during Thumbtack's hardest times, he had no space to consider new aspirations, but as he built his assistant team, his ambition grew to include starting another company and doing more for friends.
People's ambition clearly grows linearly as their leverage grows. And the reason for this is pretty clear. When you are overwhelmed by life, uh, when you have more than you can possibly handle, your ambition just narrows because you're trying to get through the next 24 hours.
Also said
“To the extent you take this cognitive load off, you share it with someone else, this partner or assistant, you now have the cognitive space to think about bigger goals, bigger aspirations.”— Clarifies the mechanism: cognitive offloading creates space for ambition.
Inefficiency is the price of scaling output
Swanson argues that tolerating inefficiency is a fundamental rule of the universe if you want more total output, because adding humans creates vector misalignment.
Why this matters: Reframes the common frustration with delegation—seeing things done less efficiently—as a necessary trade-off, not a failure.
Background
Many high-performers resist delegation because they can do tasks faster and better themselves. Swanson uses an analogy from Elon Musk about teams being vector sums.
Swanson borrows the concept that a company is the vector sum of all its people—vectors are never perfectly aligned, so inefficiency is inherent. The only way to increase total output is to accept more inefficiency, because more humans means more misalignment. He asks people to measure their lives by outputs that matter (date nights, workouts, hobbies) rather than by efficiency. You don't care about the inefficiencies that produced those outputs; you just want the good life. He gives the example of Michael Jordan: if Jordan mowed his own lawn, he'd be amazing at it, but he'd be sacrificing something else. The key mindset shift is to stop optimizing for efficiency and start optimizing for total meaningful output. This is especially hard for perennial over-optimizers, but it's a non-negotiable law of scaling.
The only way to get more output is to have a higher tolerance for inefficiency. And that's just a fundamental rule of the universe.
Also said
“Does Michael Jordan mow his own lawn? No. But you know what? I bet if he did, he'd be effing amazing, right? And whoever does it is never going to reach his level potential. But he could just be doing something else.”— Illustrates the trade-off with a vivid example.
“How do you measure your life? Do you measure it by efficiency or do you measure it by how many times you go on a date with your wife or how many times you exercise or how much you spend time doing a hobby? Those outputs are what you actually care about.”— Shifts the metric from process efficiency to life outcomes.
Delegation is accessible at zero cost
Swanson insists that anyone can start delegating without money by using friend groups, ChatGPT, or simple swaps like babysitting cooperatives.
Why this matters: Directly counters the criticism that delegation is only for the wealthy; provides a ladder from free to expensive.
Background
The conversation acknowledged that 'having staff' sounds out of touch. Swanson, a farm boy from the Midwest, addresses this head-on.
Swanson outlines a 'level zero' approach: get four friends together and agree to babysit each other's kids one night a week—you get three free nights of babysitting. Similarly, rotate hosting dinner parties so each person only plans one per quarter but enjoys monthly gatherings. These cost nothing and build delegation skills. The next rung is ChatGPT at $20/month, which can act as a coach, checking in daily on habits and providing weekly report cards. Then Upwork at $5–10/hour, then a managed service like Athena at $3,000/month, then an in-person assistant at $100k/year, scaling up to billionaire-level teams of 50. The point is that delegation is a spectrum, and everyone can take the first step with whatever resources they have. The skill of delegating—prompt engineering, giving feedback, exporting context—is the same whether you're delegating to an AI or a human.
Personal experience
Swanson grew up on a farm with no assistants or cleaners, so he understands the cultural resistance, but he built his way up step by step.
It's possible to get leverage without spending any money, right? You can use chat GPT to get started. You can delegate to your friends, right? If you don't have a single dollar to spend on an assistant, you can get a group of four friends together and say, 'Hey, let's all babysit each other's kids one night a week while you just got a free babysitter for those other three nights.'
Also said
“You start small with whatever resources you have and you learn to delegate to an AI assistant. People talk about prompt engineering. That's just delegation.”— Equates prompt engineering with delegation skill, making it accessible.
The brain itself is wired by delegation
Swanson claims that the brain's architecture—prefrontal cortex for novel tasks, lower structures for routine—is evidence that delegation is built into our neural design.
Why this matters: Provides a biological basis for delegation as natural, not a modern luxury.
Background
The host asked about the neuroscience of delegation. Swanson connected it to the brain's energy optimization.
Swanson explains that the brain relentlessly optimizes for energy and information. It distributes tasks hierarchically: complex, novel tasks go to the prefrontal cortex; routine, automated tasks are offloaded to lower neural structures. He argues that this internal delegation is not just a feature of the brain but the very process that shaped its evolution. Therefore, external delegation—handing tasks to another person—is simply an extension of what the brain already does internally. This reframe helps people overcome guilt or pride: you're not being lazy; you're mimicking your brain's own operating system. It also suggests that the skill of delegation is deeply natural, even if modern culture has trained us to valorize doing everything ourselves.
It's not that our brain was merely wired for delegation, but it was wired by delegation. And it's just built into our brains from the very beginning. We delegate inside our brains and now we can delegate between brains.
Also said
“The brain has crafted this hierarchy of task distribution where complex novel tasks are tackled by our prefrontal cortex and routine tasks are offloaded to lower and more automated neural structures.”— Details the specific neural mechanism.
Historical greats all had personal assistants
Swanson's research using AI on thousands of biographies found that figures like Cicero, Newton, Caesar, Einstein, and Edison all relied heavily on assistants, though history books omit them.
Why this matters: Undermines the myth of the lone genius; delegation is a common thread among history's highest achievers.
Background
The host questioned how novel delegation is. Swanson's team ran an AI analysis of 1,000 historical figures.
Swanson's team downloaded 10 biographies each for a thousand historical greats and used AI to search for delegation patterns. They found that virtually all of them—Cicero, Newton, Caesar, Einstein, Voltaire, Gates, Churchill, Picasso, Buddha—had personal assistants. He argues this is not a coincidence: these individuals didn't just 10x output; they 1000x'd it, and a team, especially an assistant, was instrumental. History books focus on the individual, but the reality is an organization behind them. He gives specific examples: Cicero's assistant helped manage the Roman Empire; Catherine the Great delegated her dating life to someone who screened 'male capacity'; the Wright brothers delegated the first engine design; Darwin had an army of fact-gatherers; Edison delegated finding the lightbulb filament to an assistant who found it in Kyoto (a shrine exists there today). The lesson: if you want to accomplish great things, don't try to do it alone—even the greatest didn't.
History doesn't award style points for doing it all yourself. History awards points for getting it done. And the way you get things done is with a team.
Also said
“Catherine the Great, I think was one of the greats at delegation. She delegated not just managing her empire and rewriting the laws, but she also had someone she delegated her dating life. And so she had someone dedicated to first dates and to testing quote male capacity.”— A striking, specific example of extreme delegation.
“Edison delegated to an assistant to find the filament for the first light bulb. They found it in Kyoto and there's actually a shrine that exists in Kyoto today to the assistant who found this.”— Shows that even iconic inventions were delegated.
Recommendations
Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode
5 items
ChatGPT
Tool
Swanson recommends ChatGPT as a $20/month entry point for delegation, using it as a coach to check in on daily habits and provide report cards.
He positions ChatGPT as the second level of his delegation ladder (after free friend swaps). It's a low-cost way to learn prompt engineering, which is essentially delegation. Users can set up daily accountability prompts for exercise, sleep, or other habits. While limited in proactivity, it builds the foundational skill of offloading mental tasks to an external system. He notes that AI will become more proactive over time, but for now it's an excellent training tool.
vs alternatives
Compared to a human assistant, ChatGPT is far cheaper but cannot anticipate needs or handle complex, multi-step tasks requiring physical action. It's a stepping stone, not a replacement.
You can use chat GPT to get started... if you want to exercise more you can go to chatpt and say every day ask me if I've exercised and check in with me and give me a report card at the end of the week. It can do that 20 bucks a month.
Swanson suggests Upwork as the next step after ChatGPT, where you can hire freelancers for $5–10/hour for specific tasks.
Once someone has practiced delegation with AI and has a small budget, Upwork provides access to human assistants for discrete tasks. This teaches the dynamics of managing a remote worker, giving feedback, and building trust. It's more flexible and affordable than a dedicated assistant service.
vs alternatives
Compared to Athena, Upwork requires more hands-on management and vetting, but is cheaper and suitable for one-off tasks rather than an ongoing partnership.
Once you have the resources for, you know, 5-10 bucks an hour, you can go to Upwork or a company like that and hire someone directly.
For those with larger budgets, Swanson notes that an in-person assistant costs around $100,000 per year and provides physical presence for errands and local tasks.
Swanson describes this as the high end of the delegation spectrum for most people. An in-person assistant can handle arms-and-legs tasks (errands, office management, physical coordination) that a virtual assistant cannot. He recommends combining virtual and in-person if budget allows. He also mentions that some billionaires have teams of 50, including eight Princeton-graduate executive assistants, but that's out of reach for almost everyone.
vs alternatives
Compared to a virtual assistant, an in-person assistant is far more expensive but can perform physical tasks. The ideal setup is both: virtual for cognitive work, in-person for physical tasks.
If you want someone in person, it's $100,000 a year. And then, you know, it goes up to infinity.
Also said
“If you have the budget for both, that's the best. You have someone in person for arms and legs and to run around and help you and someone in the cloud who's virtual.”— Recommends the hybrid approach.
Swanson advocates repurposing an old phone as a 'freedom phone' with only essential apps, locked down by someone else holding the passcode, to eliminate passive phone use.
This is a personal experiment that Swanson found highly effective. He describes it as the only intervention that worked for his phone addiction. The practice involves taking an old phone, deleting everything except Uber and phone calls, blocking all news and social media, and giving the restrictions passcode to a trusted person (his wife) so he can't bypass it. He carries this phone outside the house. For those who can't afford a second phone, he suggests making the main phone the 'kale phone' by removing all distracting apps and keeping them only on a computer.
vs alternatives
Compared to app timers or screen time limits, the freedom phone is more extreme but far more effective because it removes the possibility of bypassing restrictions. It's a hardware-level solution rather than a software nudge.
Personal experience
Swanson uses this setup daily and says it solved his passive phone checking habit.
I kept my old phone and I downgraded it to what I call my freedom phone and I deleted everything from it except the bare essentials. I can Uber, I can make phone calls, but I don't have email. I don't have all my messaging apps. I don't have all the bad things.
Also said
“My wife has the code, so I literally can't unlock it.”— Key detail that makes the system foolproof.
Swanson recommends using voice notes as the primary method for delegating tasks and giving feedback, citing speed and richness.
He ranks voice as the best delegation medium, above typing on phone or email. Voice notes are 3–5x faster, can be done anywhere, and naturally include more context and tone. This leads to better feedback and faster iteration. He notes that top delegators at Athena use voice constantly. It requires some initial comfort-building but pays off massively.
vs alternatives
Compared to text-based delegation, voice is faster and richer but may be harder to search or reference later. Some assistants may prefer text for clarity, so it's best to combine with written summaries for complex tasks.
Personal experience
Swanson delegated almost exclusively by voice for a year and now uses it all the time.
The best way to delegate is by voice where instead of typing things you voice note. And voice is way more powerful than other mechanisms of delegating because you can talk three to five times faster.
Athena recruits, trains, and manages dedicated virtual executive assistants (based in the Philippines or Kenya) for clients, costing around $3,000/month.
DisclosureJonathan Swanson is the founder of Athena.
Swanson founded Athena to provide a managed solution for delegation. They handle recruitment, training, and ongoing management of the assistant, and also coach clients on how to delegate effectively. The assistants are full-time and build long-term relationships with clients. Swanson emphasizes that the best results come from clients who invest in the partnership, give detailed feedback, and commit for years. Athena also provides playbooks for common delegation tasks. The service is positioned for professionals and entrepreneurs who want a high-leverage, dedicated assistant without the overhead of hiring in-person.
vs alternatives
Compared to Upwork, Athena provides a vetted, trained, and managed assistant with ongoing support, but at a higher fixed monthly cost. Compared to an in-person assistant ($100k/year), it's significantly cheaper and virtual, so no physical presence.
Personal experience
Swanson uses Athena himself and has a chief of staff and a half-dozen assistants through the service.
If you've got 3,000 bucks a month, you can work at a with a company like Athena where we recruit, train, manage the assistant for you.
Also said
“Athena our assistants are based in the Philippines or Kenya where you have great talent at more affordable rates.”— Explains the cost advantage.
Swanson mentions that Athena has built internal playbooks for common delegation tasks (inbox, date nights, etc.) and shares some at playbooks.athena.com.
DisclosureResource provided by Swanson's company, Athena.
When Athena started, they realized clients needed as much coaching as assistants. They developed playbooks—step-by-step guides for delegating specific processes. These are currently internal but partially available on their website. Swanson sees them as a way to open-source delegation knowledge eventually. They serve as templates for exporting personal algorithms.
vs alternatives
There are few high-quality resources on how to delegate effectively; these playbooks fill that gap with practical, tested templates.
If you go to playbooks.athena.com, Athena.com. We've built some of our favorite playbooks for things you can delegate.
Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased
6 items
It's the most primary asset in the world. It's the ultimate currency, right? ... The real goal is to control your time and that's what we all want more of. It's the only non-renewable asset.
Crisp, foundational statement of his philosophy that time is the ultimate resource.
The most successful people I know, the happiest people I know, they're not buying things. They're not buying cars, uh, or clothes. They're buying time.
Counter-consumerist reframe that prioritizes time over material goods.
Delegation is your way of gifting to someone else. You're giving them a job. You're giving them income... the more you delegate, the more you give that gift of meaning to other people.
Reframes delegation from selfishness to generosity, addressing guilt.
History doesn't award style points for doing it all yourself. History awards points for getting it done. And the way you get things done is with a team.
Punchy, memorable line that justifies delegation through historical precedent.
It's not that our brain was merely wired for delegation, but it was wired by delegation.
Provocative neuroscientific claim that delegation is fundamental to our biology.
The only way to get more output is to have a higher tolerance for inefficiency. And that's just a fundamental rule of the universe.
Bold, universal statement that gives permission to accept imperfection in delegated work.
Sign in to share feedback
Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.
Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.
Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.