Periodic Caloric Bumps vs. Cheat Meals
DeLauer dismantles the hormonal cheat-meal argument: during restriction, basal metabolic rate drops, so a surge of calories hits a slower engine, creating a bigger effective surplus. He explains that while the emotional satisfaction can carry you through the next week of dieting, habitually relying on cheat meals leads to worse composition. He instead advocates for strategic small increases—'it works so much better to just have periodic small surpluses of calories.' He credits this shift with finally getting his own body composition under control.
Metabolic adaptation reduces resting energy expenditure during calorie restriction. A subsequent acute hypercaloric intake exceeds the lowered expenditure to a greater degree, promoting fat storage. Small, distributed caloric increments may mildly elevate metabolism without exceeding the body's capacity to utilize energy, thus preserving muscle and hormonal balance.
He confesses, 'I was always a cheat meal guy and it was always a little bit harder to keep my body composition under control or in check until I realized that it works so much better to just have periodic small surpluses of calories.'
It works so much better to just have periodic small surpluses of calories.

