Colossal, founded by Ben Lamm with George Church, is an AI-driven synthetic biology platform that tackles de-extinction as a moonshot to solve the hardest problems in biology and has spun out Breaking, a plastic-degradation company using a microbial consortium to chemically break plastics rather than just shredding them.
2
They've brought back dire wolf pups from a 73,000-year-old skull in just 18 months, achieved 90% efficiency on hundreds of multiplex genome edits, and surpassed previous records for large DNA synthesis delivery by 5x, with plans for 20x soon, demonstrating exponential progress in genome engineering.
3
An artificial womb program (still in development) led to a hydrogel-microfluidics device that keeps embryos healthier longer, challenging the morphological grading standard in IVF; Ben shares his personal IVF experience to highlight how the tech could transform fertility treatment.
4
The company is advancing gene drives as a humane alternative to poison and culling for invasive species—a $5.4 trillion global problem—and has partnered with the UAE to build the world's first bio vault, a nine-figure biobanking initiative for endangered fauna with educational components.
Protocols
Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why
6 items
Start with de-extinction to build a synthetic biology platform
WhatChoose a moonshot de-extinction project to force solving the hardest problems in biology (genotype-phenotype, ancestral state reconstruction, comparative genomics) and create a reusable pipeline.
WhenWhen founding a synthetic biology company aiming for broad applications.
For whomEntrepreneurs, biotech startups
WhyDe-extinction requires solving end-to-end challenges—from computational biology to cloning—that then become a platform for other biological products, as the same system can make plastic-degrading microbes or disease-resistant plants.
CaveatsRequires massive investment, interdisciplinary team, and patience; not for narrow point solutions.
Ben Lamm's insight is that the hardest problems in biology are not in a specific disease but in reconstructing and engineering entire organisms. De-extinction demands understanding how genetic changes manifest in whole-animal traits, which many biomedical fields ignore. Colossal intentionally chose this path to develop a comprehensive platform incorporating computational biology, cellular engineering, gene editing, cloning, and eventually artificial wombs. This contrasts with the typical biotech approach of targeting a single therapeutic. By tackling de-extinction, they built a system that could then quickly spin out companies like Breaking for plastic degradation, demonstrating the power of a platform. He advises that this 'start with the hardest thing' strategy, powered by AI, yields superior capabilities and multiple revenue streams, making the company undervalued at $10B.
Mechanism
By working on extinct species, you face unknown genotype-phenotype links, requiring AI-driven comparative genomics and ancestral state reconstructions. This forces development of tools that later generalize.
Personal experience
When I met George Church, I asked him what he'd work on with unlimited capital, and he instantly said 'bring back mammoths and build technology for species and human health'. That led to founding Colossal.
We thought that if we're going to go build this end-to-end pipeline... what's the best way to do it? And we thought, well, if you start with de-extinction... because we were going to have to solve some of the hardest problems in biology.
Also said
“So, the same system that can bring you a mammoth can also make microbes that can break the chemical bonds of plastic.”— Shows the direct spin-off potential.
“I really do think that productionizing endangered species and also helping species adapt at the same curve of which we are changing environments is also something that's going to be needed in the future because evolution is not fast unless it's directed.”— Reinforces the proactive intervention philosophy.
Use microbial consortia, not single enzymes, for plastic degradation
WhatWhen developing biological solutions for plastics, look for a consortium of microbes that together break chemical bonds, then use directed evolution and gene editing to enhance their specificity and rate.
WhenFor environmental biotech projects aiming to eliminate microplastics without creating smaller fragments.
For whomEnvironmental biotech researchers, plastic remediation companies
WhyMost degradation attempts produce microplastics; consortium-based enzymatic breakdown mineralizes plastic. Directed evolution can supercharge the enzymes for diverse plastics and faster action.
CaveatsScale-up from lab to industrial or in-vivo (human gut) is complex; safety and regulation require extensive testing.
Colossal's spin-out Breaking originally thought they had a single enzyme from a microbe discovered at the Wyss Institute. Deeper analysis showed a consortium of microbes cooperating. This was better because they could edit each microbe to produce different enzyme variants tailored to various plastics. The plastic crisis affects oceans, food, and human health (microplastics in brain, reproductive tissue). Current solutions often just shred plastic into microplastics, worsening the problem. Breaking's approach chemically breaks plastic, and they aim to develop a supplement to degrade microplastics in the gut before absorption. This protocol emphasizes the importance of looking beyond single-strain solutions and leveraging ecosystem complexity.
Mechanism
A natural microbial community produces multiple enzymes that work synergistically to cleave chemical bonds in polymers. Colossal used its AI-driven editing tools to perform directed evolution on each microbe, creating variant enzymes targeting different plastics and improving catalytic efficiency per surface area.
it's a concert of microbes working together... we were able to essentially understand the enzymes that were being made. We're also understanding the ability to edit each one of the microbes to make different variants of the enzymes to hit different types of plastics.
Also said
“Most plastic treatment and degradation companies are just making smaller plastics... that's not solving the problem.”— Exposes the flaw in existing approaches.
“we were able to use directed evolution and supercharge it using our pipeline and some of our editing tools so that not only does it have a larger breadth of plastics it can break down, but it also breaks them down at a much faster rate per surface area.”— Details the engineering and performance gains.
Adopt a product and systems model for synthetic biology, leveraging AI
WhatInstead of solving one-off point solutions, build an end-to-end AI-driven platform that integrates computational biology, genetic engineering, and automation to develop multiple biological products.
WhenWhen building a biotech company with broad ambitions.
For whomBiotech founders, R&D strategists
WhyMost synthetic biology efforts focus on specific human health applications; a systems model accelerates progress and creates multiple spin-out opportunities, as demonstrated by Colossal's pipeline.
CaveatsRequires substantial upfront investment in AI and automation, and a multidisciplinary team.
Ben emphasizes that Colossal doesn't always lead with AI even though AI is fundamental. Without AI, they couldn't achieve the hundreds of multiplex edits or 5x DNA synthesis delivery. The product and systems approach contrasts with traditional academic or biotech point solutions, which are siloed and slower. By treating synthetic biology as an engineering discipline with a robust platform, they've achieved rates of progress that outpace the field. This model is applicable beyond de-extinction: they've spun out companies for plastics, artificial wombs, vaccines, etc. The platform effect means each new breakthrough improves all spin-outs through shared editing efficiencies and data.
Mechanism
By connecting genotype to phenotype via AI models and automating the design-build-test cycle, the platform can quickly iterate on genetic constructs, leading to higher editing efficiency and larger DNA synthesis deliveries.
Personal experience
I came from software, so I thought we'd just plug into the GCP of species, which doesn't exist. So we had to build reference genomes... and then we said this should be more of a global project.
We have taken a product and systems model approach to synthetic biology leveraging AI. Whereas most people are trying to solve one-off point solutions for human health care.
Also said
“Without AI we would not be able to do anything that we're doing.”— Stresses the centrality of AI.
“the same system that can bring you a mammoth can also make microbes that can break the chemical bonds of plastics.”— Illustrates the platform versatility.
Use gene drives with roll-back capacity for humane invasive species control
WhatDevelop and release genetically engineered organisms that distort sex ratios to produce all-male offspring, thereby humanely reducing invasive populations, and include a mechanism to reverse the drive.
WhenWhen dealing with invasive species that cause ecological or economic harm and where traditional control methods (poison, culling) are inhumane or ineffective.
For whomGovernment agencies, conservation organizations
WhyGene drives are species-specific, avoid ecosystem disruption when target is invasive, and can end the need for mass killing. The roll-back feature addresses biosafety concerns.
CaveatsMust ensure the target is truly invasive and not part of the native food web; public acceptance and regulatory frameworks are still developing. The screwworm case is ideal because it's clearly invasive.
The invasive species problem is massive—$5.4 trillion globally—and current methods like poison and trapping are environmentally damaging and cause immense animal suffering. Ben gives the example of the screwworm, which is moving into Texas and threatening cattle. Traditional vaccines face regulatory hurdles and public resistance due to anti-GMO sentiment. Gene drives offer a precise alternative: they only affect the target species and reduce populations without direct killing. Colossal's proprietary tech includes roll-back capabilities to increase safety, which could ease regulatory and public fears. They are working with governments. He also notes that earlier mosquito gene drive trials were halted due to food web concerns, but invasive species are not integral to ecosystems, making them ideal targets. This approach could be applied to cane toads, carp, cats, etc., in Australia and New Zealand, where millions of animals are culled inhumanely.
Mechanism
By releasing insects carrying a gene drive that biases sex determination (e.g., only male offspring), the population eventually becomes all male and collapses. The drive can be designed with a genetic 'kill switch' or reversal drive to restore normal sex ratios if needed.
if you engineer the right gene drives into them and create the right bio control around them, you can have animals and including insects live out their normal lives and then over time you have a decrease in that population humanely.
Also said
“The invasive species problem is global problem. It's about $5.4 trillion as currently measured.”— Quantifies the incentive.
“We have an interesting model to it and some proprietary technologies that makes it, you know, safer than what has ever been dispersed in the wild. And also, we have the ability to roll it back.”— Highlights roll-back safety feature.
Replace morphological grading with extended embryo culture and hydrogel/microfluidics for IVF
WhatInstead of selecting embryos based on morphological appearance at day 3 or 5, use a hydrogel and microfluidics device to culture embryos longer, allowing later-stage assessment that better predicts embryo health.
WhenFor IVF clinics seeking to improve embryo selection accuracy and reduce failed transfers.
DoseExtend culture beyond conventional day 5, using continuous microfluidic perfusion.
For whomIVF clinics, embryologists, fertility patients
WhyMorphological grading at a single time point is inaccurate; many embryos that appear poor early become the healthiest later. The device mimics in vivo conditions, improving embryo viability.
CaveatsThe device is not yet approved for human use; Colossal does not work with human embryos but the technology is transferable. Requires clinical validation.
Ben explains that to succeed with artificial wombs for mammals, they had to innovate in embryo culture. They built a device that keeps embryos healthier longer. They discovered that the standard morphological grading used in IVF—where embryos are graded at day 3 or 5 based on cell symmetry and fragmentation—misses the healthiest embryos. In animal models, embryos that looked bad early turned out to be the best if given more time. This insight came from non-model species research. He draws from his personal IVF journey, where he felt the process was archaic and emotionally fraught. Although Colossal's direct work is on non-human species, the same principles apply to humans. They are considering spinning out an IVF improvement company based on this technology. This protocol challenges the status quo in fertility clinics and could increase success rates.
Mechanism
The hydrogel and microfluidics system provides a more physiological environment, reducing stress and providing consistent nutrient exchange. This allows embryos to progress through development stages that reveal true developmental potential, correcting for early asynchronous growth.
Personal experience
I got kids now and they're great. And we went through the IVF process and you know, it's a little it's weird and crazy and it's archaic and emotional. And then like this thing that's so precious, you like look at it from like this archaic grading scale... it's crazy.
what we found is that sometimes embryos that are day two that are day three or day five... they aren't the winner of the race morphologically at that stage where most humans make their decision, but if you go a little bit longer they actually are the healthiest embryo, which is kind of crazy, right?
Also said
“we had to build a hydrogel and microfluidics device that actually makes the embryos healthier. And we've actually been able to take embryos in non-model species much further than anyone else has in the world.”— Describes the technology and its superiority.
“That same technology could be applied to embryos, and we have a slightly different grading scale that is proving way more efficient and way more importantly way more accurate.”— Links directly to human IVF improvement.
Educate stakeholders using historical analogies to overcome GMO resistance
WhatWhen advocating for genetically modified organisms, use the seat belt analogy—initially feared as signaling danger, later accepted as safety standard—to reframe GMOs as life-saving, not threatening.
WhenIn discussions with policymakers, regulators, or the public about genetically modified species reintroduction or gene drives.
For whomScience communicators, biotech advocates, policy negotiators
WhyAnti-GMO sentiment based on fear, not science; analogies reframe the narrative. Seat belts were once rejected because they implied cars were dangerous, but now they're mandatory safety devices. Similarly, GMOs have saved lives without harm.
CaveatsAnalogies may not fully address deeper ethical concerns, but they open a dialog.
Ben recounts having to educate the Australian government that Tasmanian tigers, even if 100% genetically identical to original, are technically GMOs, and their anti-GMO stance would prevent rewilding. He argues that GMOs have saved millions of lives (e.g., insulin, crops) and that the fear is akin to early resistance to seat belts. He suggests using this analogy to depersonalize the fear. This is a marketing/education protocol derived from their real-world experience with governments. He also analogizes current invasive species control (poison) to archaic cancer treatments, urging a shift to modern genetic approaches.
Personal experience
When we were meeting with the Australian government about reintroducing the Tasmanian tiger... their law technically the Tasmanian tigers are GMOs... we had to then educate... GMOs have saved so many lives. They've taken nobody.
there was a season when seat belts were scary for people... there was literally a time where cars were like, 'No, we can't put seat belts in cars because it's going to make people think cars are bad'... Well, cars are dangerous, right? And so it's an opportunity to educate.
Also said
“GMOs have saved so many lives. They've taken nobody.”— Powerful, concise statement of safety.
What's new
Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions
6 items
de-extinction-as-biological-moonshot
Colossal chose de-extinction as its starting point because it forces solving genotype-to-phenotype relationships, ancestral state reconstructions, and comparative genomics, creating a platform applicable to many other biological products.
Why this matters: Most synthetic biology companies focus on human health care; this approach uses a biodiversity-first strategy to build a generalizable AI-powered platform.
Background
Previously, de-extinction was a niche idea pursued by nonprofits without significant funding or a systems engineering approach.
Ben Lamm explains that when he met George Church, Church instantly said he'd work on mammoth de-extinction with unlimited capital. Lamm initially planned to fund it as a side project but quickly realized the potential to build an end-to-end pipeline. They reasoned that starting with de-extinction—solving some of biology's hardest problems—would create a system model for everything from disease-resistant plants to plastic-degrading microbes. The platform integrates computational biology, cellular engineering, genetic engineering, cloning, somatic cell nuclear transfer, and eventually artificial wombs. By solving genotype-to-phenotype and comparative genomics for extinct species, they built capabilities that can be applied broadly. This contrasts with the typical single-point solution approach in biotech. The result is a parent company that spins out multiple ventures, each attacking a global challenge. This 'platform' thesis allowed Colossal to reach a $10 billion valuation in four years.
We thought that if we're going to go build this end-to-end pipeline for synthetic biology... what's the best way to do it? And we thought, well, if you start with de-extinction... we were going to have to solve some of the hardest problems in biology.
Also said
“So, the same system that can bring you a mammoth can also make microbes that can, you know, break the chemical bonds of plastic.”— Illustrates the platform-reusability of de-extinction tech.
“I really do think that productionizing endangered species and also helping species adapt at the same curve of which we are changing environments is also something that's going to be needed in the future because evolution is not fast unless it's directed.”— Expands on why proactive genetic intervention is necessary.
microbial-consortium-plastic-degradation
Breaking, a spin-out, discovered that plastic degradation arises from a concert of microbes working together, not a single enzyme, and uses directed evolution to supercharge these microbes to break chemical bonds of plastics, outperforming methods that merely create smaller microplastics.
Why this matters: Most plastic treatment companies inadvertently produce microplastics; Breaking's approach actually mineralizes plastic, and they are exploring a supplement to break down microplastics in the human gut before absorption.
Background
Traditional plastic degradation often involves shredding or chemical pre-treatment that leaves smaller plastic particles, exacerbating the microplastic crisis. The idea of microbial degradation had been studied, but efficiency and breadth were limited.
Ben describes how they initially thought they had discovered a single enzyme from a microbe at the Wyss Institute, but further analysis revealed a consortium of microbes collaborating to break chemical bonds. This set of microbes and their enzymes can be edited to target different plastic types. They applied directed evolution and their gene editing pipeline to increase both the spectrum of plastics that can be degraded and the rate of degradation per surface area. The plastic crisis is not just an environmental problem; microplastics are found in human brains, reproductive tissues, and cross the blood-brain barrier. Breaking aims to tackle this by not making smaller plastics but by chemically destroying them. Ben envisions a future supplement that could break down microplastics in the gut before absorption, addressing the 5g of plastic estimated to be in the average brain. This spin-out exemplifies how Colossal's de-extinction platform yields solutions to global environmental health problems.
What's interesting about this discovery is it actually breaks the chemical bonds of the plastic. And so we were able to use directed evolution and supercharge it using our pipeline and some of our editing tools so that not only does it have a larger breadth of plastics it can break down, but it also breaks them down at a much faster rate per surface area.
Also said
“Most plastic treatment and degradation companies are just making smaller plastics. They're just making smaller microplastics and that's not solving the problem in any capacity.”— Highlights the failure of current industry approaches.
“We are starting to look at the human body and and imagine a supplement you could take that actually breaks down the bonds of the microplastics in your gut before it gets absorbed.”— Reveals the ambitious supplement concept beyond environmental cleanup.
multiplex-genome-editing-efficiency
Colossal has moved from doing a couple of edits at 40% efficiency to hundreds of edits at 90% efficiency across the genome, with plans for thousands, far surpassing typical efficiencies of 15%.
Why this matters: This precision and scale of multiplex editing, coupled with high efficiency, is unprecedented and could be applied to human healthcare if licensed, though Colossal stays focused on biodiversity.
Background
Two years ago, the state of the art was making a few edits with 15-40% efficiency. Colossal itself celebrated 40% efficiency at that time.
Ben contrasts the field's typical progress: most groups still do single-digit edits at 15% efficiency. Two to three years ago, Colossal did victory laps for a couple of edits at 40%. Now they routinely perform hundreds of edits at 90% efficiency, meaning almost all targeted cells are successfully edited. These edits are non-linear, spread across the entire genome, and precise enough that Ben would feel comfortable applying the technology to human healthcare (but they'd spin it out or license it). They also broke records on large DNA synthesis delivery, surpassing the previous largest delivery by 5x and expecting 20x by year-end. This rapid acceleration is attributed to their AI-driven product and systems model approach to synthetic biology, which differs from one-off point solutions common in biomedical research. The progress suggests that genome engineering is on an exponential curve, opening possibilities for de-extinction and beyond.
2 years ago, 3 years ago, we were doing victory laps when we did a couple edits... We're now doing hundreds of edits at a time... now we're doing hundreds of edits at 90% efficiency. I think in the coming years that's thousands of edits.
Also said
“We've surpassed the largest delivery (DNA synthesis) by 5x already. I think that's we'll be at 20x before the end of this year.”— Adds DNA synthesis dimension to the editing prowess.
hydrogel-microfluidics-embryo-health
To achieve artificial wombs, Colossal developed a hydrogel and microfluidics device that keeps embryos healthier longer, revealing that morphological grading at day 3/5 often misses the healthiest embryo, which could revolutionize IVF grading.
Why this matters: It challenges the decades-old morphological grading system used in IVF clinics worldwide, with evidence that later-stage assessment is more accurate, and it stems from a biodiversity-focused company's tech.
Background
IVF clinics globally rely on morphological grading at day 3 or day 5 post-fertilization to select embryos for transfer, a subjective method that hasn't changed in decades.
Ben shares that while working on mammalian artificial wombs (unsuccessful yet), they needed to innovate in keeping embryos viable longer. They built a hydrogel and microfluidics device that mimics in vivo conditions. In both model and non-model species, they found that embryos that appear morphologically poor at day 2 or 3 can become the healthiest if cultured longer. This insight could transform IVF, where parents currently make decisions based on a snapshot and poor imaging. Ben's personal IVF experience with his wife highlighted the emotional and archaic nature of the process, driving his passion to improve it. Although Colossal is not currently working with human embryos, the technology is transferable and they are considering a spin-out or license. The device not only improves embryo health but also enables a more accurate grading system. This is a direct spin-off from their de-extinction work on artificial wombs.
Personal experience
I've got kids now and they're great. And we went through the IVF process and you know, it's a little it's weird and crazy and it's archaic and emotional. And then like this thing that's so precious, you like look at it from like this archaic grading scale... it's crazy.
what we found is that sometimes embryos that are day two that are day three or day five... they aren't the winner of the race morphologically at that stage where most humans make their decision, but if you go a little bit longer they actually are the healthiest embryo, which is kind of crazy, right?
Also said
“we had to build a hydrogel and microfluidics device that actually makes the embryos healthier. And we've actually been able to take embryos in non-model species much further than anyone else has in the world.”— Describes the enabling technology and its uniqueness.
“That same technology could be applied to embryos, and we have a slightly different grading scale that is proving way more efficient and way more importantly way more accurate.”— Bridges to human IVF application and new grading system.
gene-drives-humane-invasive-control
Colossal is developing gene drives that produce all-male offspring in invasive species (e.g., screwworm) to humanely reduce their populations, with built-in roll-back mechanisms, addressing a $5.4 trillion global problem.
Why this matters: Current invasive species control relies on poison, trapping, and culling, which is environmentally destructive and a welfare nightmare. Gene drives offer a species-specific, non-toxic alternative, and Colossal claims proprietary safety features.
Background
Gene drives were previously tested in Africa for mosquitoes but halted due to concerns over ecosystem impacts. Invasive species, by definition, are not part of the native food web, making them ideal targets.
Ben explains that the invasive species problem costs $5.4 trillion globally (hard to quantify but immense). In the US alone, over $500 billion is spent annually dealing with them, mostly through poisons and lethal control, which is inhumane. The screwworm is a current threat moving into Texas, decimating cattle. Traditional methods require vaccinating animals (which meets USDA and anti-GMO hurdles) or poisoning. Gene drives offer a solution: release genetically modified insects (like screwworm) that bias offspring sex ratios so that over generations the population becomes all male and collapses. Colossal's version includes roll-back safety to reverse the drive if needed, and they focus strictly on invasive species to avoid food web disruption. They work with governments. The technology evolved from earlier mosquito gene drive controversies, but by targeting invasive species, it sidesteps the ecological concern. This approach could end the need for mass culling of cats, possums, etc., in Australia and New Zealand, addressing an animal welfare crisis.
an idea that you could create genetically modified screwworms and release them so that as the next generation are produced, they're all male. And so you over time no matter how much they love each other, they're not going to make more.
Also said
“The invasive species problem is global problem. It's about $5.4 trillion as currently measured.”— Quantifies the economic scale.
“We have an interesting model to it and some proprietary technologies that makes it, you know, safer than what has ever been dispersed in the wild. And also, we have the ability to roll it back.”— Addresses safety and controllability, a key concern.
world-first-bio-vault
Colossal partnered with the UAE to build the world's first bio vault, a large-scale biobanking and sequencing initiative for endangered animals, with a nine-figure investment and educational component.
Why this matters: No equivalent biobank for animals exists at this scale; it fills a gap where fragmented efforts by nonprofits and zoos have been limited. The model emphasizes national pride, data sharing, and public engagement.
Background
Plant biobanks like the Svalbard Global Seed Vault exist, but animal biobanking is fragmented with no global reference genome project for species. Colossal had to generate reference genomes for each species they work on.
Ben describes realizing early on that there was no 'GCP of species'—a global reference genome database for animals. To do de-extinction, they had to build reference genomes themselves, which they then saw as a public good. They conceived a bio vault that combines sample storage with genome sequencing and educational exhibits, placed in a high-traffic area rather than hidden. The UAE committed hundreds of millions of dollars to the first bio vault, focusing on the region's unique and threatened fauna. This serves multiple purposes: preserving genetic diversity, generating data for global science, and engaging the public and students. The deal included a living lab for continued research. This model can be replicated with other countries, turning species preservation into a subsidized, educational endeavor that also benefits Colossal's platform. It's a nine-figure initiative for both Colossal and the UAE.
we announced the world's first bio vault. There's not the equivalent of the bio vault for animals as there are for plants, right? You've got a lot of fragmentation... we partnered with the UAE as our first partner.
Recommendations
Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode
1 item
Use seat belt analogy to reframe GMO fear
Practice
When advocating for GMOs, use the historical example that seat belts were initially resisted because they implied cars were dangerous, but they're now standard safety equipment. This reframes genetic modification as a safety feature rather than a risk.
Ben used this analogy in discussions with the Australian government to overcome their anti-GMO stance on Tasmanian tiger reintroduction. He argues that just as seat belts were once seen as scary, GMOs have saved lives without harm and are a necessary tool for biodiversity and food security. The practice can be employed by anyone communicating about biotechnology to skeptical audiences.
vs alternatives
Alternative communication strategies focus on data-heavy scientific arguments; this uses relatable historical parallel to sidestep entrenched fear.
Personal experience
We had to educate the Australian government that Tasmanian tigers are technically GMOs... GMOs have saved so many lives. They've taken nobody.
there was a season when seat belts were scary for people... there was literally a time where cars were like, 'No, we can't put seat belts in cars because it's going to make people think cars are bad'... Well, cars are dangerous, right? And so it's an opportunity to educate.
Also said
“GMOs have saved so many lives. They've taken nobody.”— Memorable, bold claim about GMO safety.
Breaking uses a microbial consortium to chemically break down plastics, aiming to address microplastic pollution and potentially develop a supplement for human gut microplastics.
DisclosureBen Lamm is CEO of Colossal, which founded and spun out Breaking.
As explained, most plastic degradation companies only create smaller microplastics, exacerbating the problem. Breaking discovered that a set of microbes working together can break chemical bonds. Colossal applied its AI-driven directed evolution to supercharge the enzymes, expanding the range of degradable plastics and speeding up the process. The company is exploring applications from environmental cleanup to in-vivo microplastic degradation.
vs alternatives
Unlike mechanical shredding or chemical pre-treatment that leave harmful microplastics, Breaking aims to mineralize plastic completely.
what's interesting about this discovery is it actually breaks the chemical bonds of the plastic... we were able to use directed evolution and supercharge it using our pipeline.
Also said
“Most plastic treatment and degradation companies are just making smaller plastics... that's not solving the problem.”— Points out the failure of existing technology.
ViaGen is the leading animal cloning company, having cloned 15 of the 18 species ever successfully cloned, with a consistent 78% efficiency, far above the industry average of 2%. They offer pet cloning and conservation cloning for endangered species.
DisclosureColossal acquired the world's top two cloning companies, including ViaGen.
Ben highlights that ViaGen cloned the only endangered species ever cloned, such as the black-footed ferret, from old cells. The company also clones pets, including Tom Brady's dog. The efficiency and expertise are unparalleled. Colossal keeps this profitable business running while applying the technology to productionize cloning of critically endangered species in partnership with governments.
vs alternatives
Other cloning services have much lower success rates (~2%). ViaGen's 78% efficiency makes it the gold standard.
most cloning efficiencies is only about 2%. And ViaGen's was at 78% pretty consistently. ... the only endangered species that have ever been cloned on the planet were cloned by ViaGen.
Also said
“and we did clone Tom Brady's dog, so I think we're part of that.”— Adds a notable consumer example.
Colossal Bio Vault (biobanking and sequencing for countries)
Service Sponsored · disclosed
The Bio Vault is a large-scale biobanking facility combined with genome sequencing and public education, designed to preserve endangered species' genetic material and make data available to the global scientific community.
DisclosureBen Lamm is CEO of Colossal, which partnered with UAE to build bio vault.
Colossal built reference genomes for its de-extinction work and saw a gap: no global animal biobank equivalent to the Svalbard seed vault. They partnered with UAE, which committed hundreds of millions, to create the first bio vault, housing cells and sequences from threatened fauna, especially in the Arabian Peninsula. It includes a public education center. The model is replicable for other nations, turning biodiversity preservation into a source of national pride and a subsidized research asset.
vs alternatives
Existing efforts are fragmented across zoos and nonprofits with no centralized, high-throughput, publicly accessible repository.
we announced the world's first bio vault. There's not the equivalent of the bio vault for animals as there are for plants... we partnered with the UAE as our first partner.
Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.
Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.