UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
The Confession of Krzysztof Jackowski - who is the legendary Polish clairvoyant?
~126 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

The Confession of Krzysztof Jackowski - who is the legendary Polish clairvoyant?

Cyprian Majcher
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Krzysztof Jackowski, a self-taught Polish clairvoyant, claims to have solved hundreds of missing-person and homicide cases by using objects belonging to the missing to trigger visions, often with precise location details.

2

He describes his first spontaneous vision at age 25-26 during a period of severe sleep deprivation, where he foresaw a water outage and a specific street excavation, which later proved accurate.

3

Jackowski rejects the label 'jasnowidz' (clairvoyant) as a permanent state, insisting that 'jasnowidzem się bywa' (one is a clairvoyant only occasionally) and that visions come unexpectedly, not from the mind.

4

He provided documentation of police letters thanking him for help, including a case where he located a missing elderly man's body next to a cemetery wall after 10 days, and a live rescue of a mother and child from a remote pond.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

4 items

Using an object to trigger a clairvoyant vision

WhatObtain a personal item (clothing, watch, etc.) belonging to the missing person. Smell it, press it to your forehead, and try to 'absorb' something from it while focusing on the owner.
WhenWhen trying to locate a missing person or gain information about them.
DoseNo fixed duration; may take minutes to hours, or may not work at all.
For whomJackowski himself; he does not claim others can replicate it reliably.
WhyThe object carries the person's scent and energetic imprint, which can trigger a spontaneous vision. The process is not about the object's consciousness but about connecting to the person.
CaveatsVisions are unpredictable and cannot be forced. The method may appear bizarre to observers. A photo alone is less effective. The practitioner must be emotionally open and not judgmental toward the subject.

Jackowski explains that the object serves as a bridge. He often asks the family to leave him alone with the item. He smells it because scent is strongly linked to memory and identity. He presses it to his forehead, imagining he is drawing something in. The vision, when it comes, is like a photograph or a short film—sometimes in color, sometimes black and white. He emphasizes that he must accept the person completely, even if they were a criminal, otherwise the connection fails. This protocol is not taught as a learnable skill; it's his personal method developed over 30 years.

Mechanism

Jackowski does not provide a scientific mechanism; he describes it as 'czytanie cudzej myśli' (reading someone else's thought) or tapping into traumatic memories that the person emanates. He likens it to a Bluetooth connection between minds, suggesting that the brain can receive information non-locally, similar to how technology transmits data wirelessly.

Personal experience

He describes using a reklamówka z Biedronki with a missing man's clothes: he didn't even touch it, just glanced at it, and the vision came. In another case, he smelled a T-shirt in a crowded Warsaw café, which immediately gave him the image of a pond where a policeman had drowned.

For a vision I need an object. (...) I smell it, because it is his scent. I press it to my forehead and tell myself that I am drawing something from this watch with my forehead.

Also said
“I have to get on his level. (...) Even if he were the blackest character, I have to accept him, because otherwise I won't reach him.”— Emphasizes the need for non-judgmental acceptance.

Living authentically and not bowing to idiots

WhatBe yourself, be truthful, and never bend your neck to fools. Do not let skeptics or societal pressure make you deny your experiences.
WhenThroughout life, especially when facing criticism or disbelief.
DoseOngoing mindset.
For whomAnyone who has unconventional experiences or beliefs.
WhyJackowski believes that many people hide their true beliefs for fear of ridicule. He argues that one should not waste time trying to convince closed-minded people but should stand by one's own verified experiences.
CaveatsHe warns not to become arrogant; the goal is not to prove others wrong but to remain true to oneself. He also says never to fully trust any clairvoyant, including himself.

Jackowski reflects that after decades of work and documented successes, he no longer feels the need to convince skeptics. He says that at 62, after heart surgery, he has done a life review and concluded that his achievements speak for themselves. He advises against 'schylać karku przed idiotami' (bowing to idiots) and says that skeptics who ignore evidence are fools. He contrasts this with his earlier years when he tried to explain and prove everything. Now he focuses on being genuine on his YouTube channel and in life.

Personal experience

He shares that he used to want to prove his abilities, but now he simply presents his documentation and lets others judge. He mentions that a transport company owner told him that listening to his talks changed his life, not because of specific truths but because of the authenticity.

It is always worth being yourself, it is always worth being truthful, but you must not. At some point in life you must not bow your neck to idiots.

Also said
“I am 62 years old. (...) At this age a person does an examination of conscience. What did I do in life? What did I achieve? (...) At this age, should I be convincing skeptics or people who would like to be convinced? Is it necessary? I come to the conclusion that it is not.”— Explains his shift in attitude with age.

How to approach death and the afterlife

WhatAccept that the soul survives death and that dying is like shedding a heavy burden. The soul can then travel freely. Live in a way that when you face God, the small acts of kindness (like caring for a stray cat) matter more than grand achievements.
WhenWhen contemplating mortality or seeking meaning.
DoseLifelong practice of compassion.
For whomAnyone, especially those afraid of death.
WhyJackowski's visions of the deceased and his own near-death reflections convince him that consciousness continues. He believes that the purpose of life is to be good to others, and that this is the true measure of a person.
CaveatsHe admits he still fears death despite his beliefs, because he is attached to this world. The vision of the afterlife is based on his subjective experiences, not provable fact.

Jackowski tells the story of focusing on a deceased neighbor and sensing the man's transition: first his hands fell away, then his legs, then he floated and found himself in a park from his youth. This confirmed for him that the soul goes to meaningful places. He also recounts the message from the old man found by the cemetery: 'They already have me and are crying, and I have already been in so many interesting places,' suggesting the soul's immediate freedom. He ties this to a broader philosophy: we are here to respect all life, even a stray cat. He shares that he tamed a feral cat named Rudzik, giving it warmth and food, and that this simple act may be what matters most in the end.

Mechanism

He describes the soul as having a personality that benefits from physical experiences (love, sex, desire) which it cannot generate on its own. Death is a release from the body's limitations. He suggests reincarnation, with countless chances to improve. He uses the metaphor of a 'przerywana wieczność' (interrupted eternity) where we return to learn and love again.

Personal experience

He describes his relationship with Rudzik, a stray cat he shelters in his boiler room. He says he awakened feeling in a completely wild animal, proving that no path is closed. He imagines that after death, God might ask the cat about him, and that living for others is the only way to truly live.

Living for yourself you will lose your life. Living for others you will gain it.

Also said
“The soul has a great benefit from being in the body, because it experiences not only traumatic old age, but experiences the raptures of love, experiences the feeling of sex, of desire. These are states that the soul by itself can imagine, but is not able to evoke physically.”— Explains why the soul incarnates.
“No one will achieve clairvoyance unless you become a good person.”— Links moral goodness to psychic ability.

Dealing with skeptics: present evidence, don't argue

WhatWhen faced with skeptics who demand proof, offer your documented cases and invite them to debunk the evidence rather than engaging in theoretical debates or performing tricks.
WhenWhen your credibility is challenged by organized skepticism.
DoseAs needed.
For whomAnyone with unconventional abilities facing dismissal.
WhyJackowski believes that his 30-year track record with police documentation is sufficient. He argues that skeptics should investigate the phenomenon as it actually occurs, not design irrelevant tests.
CaveatsThis approach may not satisfy skeptics who reject all anecdotal evidence. It requires having solid documentation.

He recounts his response to the Polish Skeptics Club: he sent them his files and asked them to prove the documents were false. They never replied. At a university talk, he publicly offered skeptics an hour to debunk his documents; none did. He contrasts this with the Japanese TV show where he was given a real missing-person case and succeeded. He also mentions that a police spokesman claimed his documents were fake, but a police academy student challenged the spokesman to report Jackowski for forgery if true; the police never did, and an official letter later confirmed positive results in several cases.

Personal experience

He describes the Opole university event in detail, including the rector's warning about protesting skeptics, and his own offer that silenced them.

Please debunk this documentation of mine. Please debunk it. I cease to exist. they did it no answer they gave me and never contacted me again.

Also said
“Skeptics, here lies the documentation. Skeptics are to debunk it, prove that it is untrue. If they do this within this hour, I give them the next hour and the meeting will end. Everyone greeted this with applause. (...) No one came.”— Shows the public challenge and the skeptics' failure to engage.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

5 items

Clairvoyance is not a permanent ability but an occasional event

Jackowski insists that he is not a clairvoyant by nature; rather, clairvoyant visions happen to him sporadically and are always a surprise, not a controllable process.

Why this matters: Contrasts with popular depictions of psychics as always-on; reframes the phenomenon as unpredictable and not a skill one can summon at will.

Background

Many people assume that a 'jasnowidz' can see the future or hidden things on demand. Jackowski pushes back, saying that even after decades of practice, he cannot force a vision and that each one is a shock.

Jackowski explains that the process of receiving a vision is varied and often embarrassing if witnessed. He prefers to work alone with an object, smelling it and pressing it to his forehead, trying to absorb something from it. But the vision itself is independent of his will. He says, 'Clairvoyance occurs in a person, but it is always a surprise, not a process that can be conducted.' This unpredictability is why he warns people never to fully trust any clairvoyant, including himself, because the experience is never certain. He contrasts this with skeptics who demand repeatable tests, arguing that the phenomenon cannot be summoned like a laboratory experiment.

Personal experience

He recounts many instances where he tried for hours with no result, only to have a vision strike suddenly when he was frustrated or relaxed, such as the case of the elderly man where he angrily thought 'Grandpa, what could have happened to you?' and immediately received the location.

One is not a clairvoyant, one is a clairvoyant occasionally. Clairvoyance occurs in a person, but it is always a surprise, not a process that can be conducted.

Also said
“The vision is independent. That is why I always say that one is not a clairvoyant, one is a clairvoyant occasionally.”— Reinforces the core claim that clairvoyance is an event, not a trait.
“Never, ever trust clairvoyants. Including me. Every clairvoyant is guided only by an experience. An experience is never a certainty.”— Shows his own skepticism toward the reliability of visions, even his own.

The necessity of a personal object for clairvoyant work

Jackowski claims that to receive a vision about a missing person, he needs an item that belongs to them, which he smells and presses to his forehead to 'absorb' something of the owner.

Why this matters: Provides a concrete, physical method that demystifies the process and offers a testable element (the object) for skeptics.

Background

Many psychic claims involve remote viewing without physical contact. Jackowski's method is tactile and olfactory, emphasizing the importance of the person's 'zapach' (scent) and energetic residue.

He explains that the object does not have consciousness, but it carries the owner's scent and perhaps an imprint. By focusing on it, he tries to connect with the person, not the object. He demonstrates with the host's watch, explaining that if he were to play with it or disrespect it, the host would feel irritation because it is his possession. This emotional connection to objects is key. He says that a photo alone is less effective than a worn item. In many cases, he received a bag of clothes from families and worked with them alone.

Personal experience

He describes receiving a reklamówka z Biedronki (plastic bag from a discount store) with the missing man's clothes, which he initially ignored. Later, just glancing at the bag triggered a vision that led to finding the body.

For a vision I need an object. (...) I smell it, because it is his scent. I press it to my forehead and tell myself that I am drawing something from this watch with my forehead, but not the consciousness of this watch, only I want to feel the person who is the owner of it, whose scent is here.

Also said
“A photo alone does not give such a result. And he says: 'Will you be long in this Warsaw?' I say, I will be until late evening, we'll figure something out, right? And then after 20 minutes he called that some policewoman would bring me an item.”— Illustrates that a photo alone is insufficient; a physical object is preferred.

Prediction of the Smolensk air disaster and US decline

Two years before the 2010 Smolensk crash, Jackowski told artist Agnieszka Kurant that a plane crash would kill the entire Polish government, and also predicted the decline of the United States as a global power.

Why this matters: A specific, documented prediction made to a third party and later published in a New York Times art project, with the artist confirming the details.

Background

The Smolensk disaster killed 96 people including the Polish president and many high-ranking officials. Jackowski's prediction was embedded in a conceptual artwork that simulated a future newspaper.

Jackowski recounts that Kurant visited him in Człuchów around 2008, commissioned to create a fictional future edition of the New York Times. He told her: 'Do you recall that plane crash of General Sikorski in Gibraltar in 1943? A similar accident will happen. Except this time the entire government will die.' She included it as a seemingly sci-fi element. After the crash, the artwork gained prophetic weight. He also predicted that America would lose its global hegemony, which he sees unfolding now with the rise of China and Russia. The Newsweek article from 2020 confirms the story.

Do you recall that plane crash of General Sikorski in Gibraltar in 1943? A similar accident will happen. Except this time the entire government will die.

Also said
“And there is one more thing that Jackowski predicted. America as a global power will lose its significance.”— Second part of the prediction, also documented.

The soul continues after death and can communicate

Jackowski asserts that his experiences prove the soul survives bodily death, and he has received messages from the deceased, including a recently deceased neighbor who 'returned' to a park from his youth.

Why this matters: Moves beyond crime-solving into metaphysical claims about the afterlife, based on personal clairvoyant experiences.

Background

Many of his visions involve locating corpses, but he says he feels the dead as living beings. He shares a story of focusing on a deceased acquaintance and sensing the man's transition: losing limbs, then floating, and finding himself in a park that held happy memories.

He describes how after finding a body, he often feels a presence. In one case, after locating an elderly man, he sat in his basement and felt the man's spirit still present. He asked to be shown what death is like, and received an image of velvet and a sense that the question was wrong. Then he heard the thought: 'They already have me and are crying, and I have already been in so many interesting places.' He interprets this as the soul being free to travel anywhere instantly. He also tells of a neighbor who died; when Jackowski focused on him, he felt the man's limbs falling away and then the realization that he was in a park—a place from his youth that Jackowski didn't know about, later confirmed by the widow.

Personal experience

The neighbor story is personal; he knew the man casually and later verified the park detail with the man's friend.

I show with these cases that very often my experiences did not mislead me. They also showed that the soul continues to live after death.

Also said
“Only when he found himself in the park did I understand that something was wrong. It was as if he first was shedding some burden, but only when he found himself in the park did he understand that something was wrong.”— Specific detail of the post-death experience he perceived.
“They already have me and are crying, and I have already been in so many interesting places.”— The message he received from the deceased man, suggesting the soul's freedom.

Skeptics' tests are invalid because they ignore the mechanism

Jackowski argues that the Polish Skeptics Club's challenge—to guess 51 out of 100 coin tosses or find hidden people—is absurd because it doesn't account for how his visions actually work, which requires a personal object and an emotional connection.

Why this matters: Shifts the burden of proof: he claims his documented successes are evidence, and skeptics should investigate those rather than design irrelevant tests.

Background

The Skeptics Club publicly dismissed him without inviting him to their meeting. They proposed tests that he considers 'kretynizm' because they ignore the need for a belonging of the missing person.

He recounts that the club organized a meeting in the Tri-City area, concluded he had no abilities, and sent him a challenge: find three hidden members in Gdańsk or guess coin tosses. He refused, calling it nonsense. He later sent them his case documentation and asked them to debunk it; they never responded. At a university talk in Opole, skeptics were present but did not accept his invitation to examine his documents publicly. He contrasts this with the Japanese TV competition, where he was given an item of a missing woman and successfully described the scene, which matched the evidence. He believes skeptics should study his actual cases, not demand parlor tricks.

Personal experience

He describes the Opole event in detail, where he offered the first hour to skeptics to debunk his documents, but no one came forward, and no one left the packed hall during the two-hour talk.

I do not take part in idiocies. (...) If you saw that someone was not serious and proposed you enter into some business, a deal, would you enter with that unserious person?

Also said
“They simply decided that a few of their members would hide, because that is exactly what was proposed, hide in the area of Gdańsk. I am to find them or the second, which they proposed more, on 100 tosses heads or tails, if I guess 51 times, they will recognize clairvoyance.”— Details the exact challenge he rejected.
“Skeptics, here lies the documentation. Skeptics are to debunk it, prove that it is untrue. If they do this within this hour, I give them the next hour and the meeting will end. (...) No one came.”— Shows his counter-challenge and the skeptics' inaction.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

2 items

Being a good person as a prerequisite for clairvoyance

Practice

Jackowski states that no one will achieve clairvoyance unless they become a good person. He ties moral development to psychic sensitivity.

He believes that to connect with a missing person, you must accept them without judgment. This requires a fundamental goodness. He shares that he tries to be a good person, not claiming to be one, but striving. He illustrates with the story of Rudzik the cat, showing that small acts of kindness are what matter. He suggests that the ability to help others through clairvoyance is a byproduct of living for others, not for oneself.

vs alternatives

Contrasts with the idea that psychic abilities are purely technical skills or innate gifts unrelated to character.

Personal experience

He describes his daily care for a stray cat, which he sees as a metaphor for opening closed paths through love.

No one will achieve clairvoyance unless you become a good person.

Also said
“Living for yourself you will lose your life. Living for others you will gain it.”— Core ethical principle he advocates.
Find Being

Google Maps for verifying visions

Tool

Jackowski uses Google Maps to match the locations he sees in visions with real geography, then prints and marks the spot for families or police.

In multiple cases, after receiving a vision of a pond, a street, or a specific feature, he goes to Google Maps, searches the area, identifies the matching location, and marks it with a circle. He then sends the map to the family. This was crucial in the rescue of the mother and child in Marianka, where he saw a 'rudy stawek' (reddish pond) and found it on the map. He also used it to pinpoint the exact street next to the Bródno cemetery where the elderly man's body lay.

vs alternatives

He doesn't compare, but it's a practical tool that grounds his visions in verifiable geography.

Personal experience

He describes the process: 'Pond reddish, reddish around it from reeds. Reddish pond Google Maps. Village of Marianka and I look for a reddish pond. There is one. I printed the map. I marked that pond with a circle and scanned it, sent it.'

Google Maps. Village of Marianka and I look for a reddish pond. There is one. I printed the map. I marked that pond with a circle and scanned it, sent it.

Find Google
Disclosed sponsorships1speaker disclosed

The Dead Speak – autobiography

Book Sponsored · disclosed

Jackowski wrote his autobiography in 2012, detailing his cases and including documentation. He recommends it as a truthful account of his experiences.

DisclosureJackowski is the author; he mentions it sold 100,000 copies and is now out of print, available on Allegro for 100-300 PLN.

He says the book sold out in 2.5 months despite him not being a writer. He attributes its success to its honesty. He notes that it's now a collector's item, with used copies selling for many times the original price. He suggests that reading it will give a fuller picture of his work and the evidence behind his claims.

vs alternatives

He implies that other books on parapsychology may be theoretical, while his is grounded in actual police cases and personal documentation.

Personal experience

He wrote it himself, based on his life and cases.

In 2012 I wrote my autobiography The Dead Speak. It turned out that it appeared in a staggering number of 100,000 copies. (...) People bought this book like hot cakes.

Also said
“Go on Allegro now. Go on and type in two volumes of Jackowski's autobiography. The Dead Speak. How much is this book going for today? Because it is true. It is sincere.”— Highlights the book's enduring value and authenticity.
Find The

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
One is not a clairvoyant, one is a clairvoyant occasionally.
Concise, memorable redefinition of clairvoyance as an event, not an identity.
It is always worth being yourself, it is always worth being truthful, but you must not. At some point in life you must not bow your neck to idiots.
Powerful call to authenticity and defiance against unreasonable critics.
Living for yourself you will lose your life. Living for others you will gain it.
Succinct moral summary of his life philosophy, almost biblical in tone.
Never, ever trust clairvoyants. Including me.
A clairvoyant warning against trusting clairvoyants—unexpected and self-undermining, which adds credibility.
They already have me and are crying, and I have already been in so many interesting places.
The message he claims to have received from a dead man, suggesting the soul's immediate freedom and adventure after death.
The irony of our civilization is that we have completely neglected our own psychic abilities, and we have produced tools that work like our psyche.
Insightful critique of modern technology as an externalization of neglected inner abilities.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

clairvoyance-definitionfirst-visionobject-based-psychometrypolice-cooperationskepticismsmolensk-predictionafterlifesoul-survivalauthenticitystray-cat-compassionjapanese-tv-competitionmother-and-child-rescuecemetery-body-locationtechnology-vs-psychic-abilitiesreincarnation
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.