Analysis of stone as a source of historical truth
Zalewski explains that he approaches each artifact like a piece of evidence, gradually eliminating impossible explanations. He describes, for example, the casing blocks of the pyramid as multi-trapezoids—a geometric figure not described in literature—which must have been individually cut by a machine, because the lower block retained marks from the cutting of the adjacent one. He claims that the construction process included at least five stages: from rough forging or milling, through increasingly precise cutting, to polishing. He also used this method at castles in Poland (Ogrodzieniec, Rabsztyn), finding identical traces there as in Egypt, Anatolia, or India—which, according to him, proves the work of the same machines across the globe.
Traces of conical core drilling, triangular drill holes, or straight saw cuts could not have been made using Bronze Age tools or even modern ones, because our civilization has not yet mastered the conical core drill.
He brought samples to the Jagiellonian University: 'I came to one of the professors, brought him stones with traces of machine processing, and here is the pottery. Oh, pottery, we know right away, Early Bronze Age… I say, what do you say about the stones? Well, it's visible something was being processed. So why do you throw these stones away at archaeological sites?'
I take a fragment of a structure, I don't take it on site, I show that here is the first stage of processing, meaning you can see traces of rough forging or milling, then more precise cutting, and then polishing.

