UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Exercise Scientist Critiques Urs Kalecinski’s Shocking Size Increase
~25 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Exercise Scientist Critiques Urs Kalecinski’s Shocking Size Increase

Mike Israetel
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Urs Kalecinski gained ~35 lbs of 'seemingly just muscle' (from 225 to 260 lbs) while staying similarly lean, pushing him past the Classic Physique weight cap and into Open Bodybuilding.

2

Mike Israetel predicts Urs will compete on stage at 270–280 lbs and has the potential to win the Mr. Olympia overall title.

3

Urs's pre-contest diet at 2 weeks out for his open debut: 326 g protein, 350 g carbs, 50 g fat, 3,214 kcal — an aggressive but reasonable deficit for a 265 lb athlete.

4

Key training technique: hand‑assisted forced reps on spider curls to challenge the entire strength curve, with controlled eccentrics for maximal bicep stimulation.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

3 items

Assisted Reps for Full Force Curve Stimulation (Spider Curl Example)

WhatUse your free hand to assist the concentric phase of a curl exercise (e.g., spider curl), then control the eccentric without assistance. This ensures the bottom, middle, and top of the movement are all challenged, turning a decent exercise into a very effective one.
WhenDuring isolation work (especially biceps) when you want to milk every portion of the force curve. Can be used when training solo and no spotter is available for forced reps.
DoseNot specified; use a weight heavy enough that the assisted concentric allows completion, and perform slow, controlled eccentrics for several reps. Likely employed in later sets when reaching failure on the top portion limits full ROM stimulus.
For whomAnyone, from those who struggle to connect with their biceps to advanced lifters seeking deeper muscle fatigue without a training partner. Especially useful for people who 'never feel their biceps' because the exercise isolates the biceps completely.
WhyThe top of a curl is the hardest part; going to failure without assistance leaves the bottom and middle under‑stimulated — you'd be 'five reps short of failure' in those ranges. Hand assistance lets you complete the rep, then the eccentric overload hits the entire range.
CaveatsMust control the eccentric — don't just drop the weight. Not necessary for beginners who can still progress with straight sets. Ensure the assistance is only enough to get past the sticking point, not so much that you're not working hard.

Mike uses Urs's spider curl technique as a teaching model: at the bottom, resistance is zero; at the top, maximum. Without assistance, you stop when the top becomes impossible, never fully fatiguing the stronger bottom/middle. Urs uses his off‑hand to nudge the dumbbell up on the concentric, then lowers it under strict control. This lets him use a weight that challenges the bottom as well as the top. He shows Urs doing the same on a machine curl, indicating the principle applies broadly. Mike also notes that the spider curl position prevents any body swing or delt involvement, making it an ideal exercise for those who struggle to connect with their biceps.

Mechanism

Mechanical tension is maximized through the full ROM by extending tension through the sticking point. The muscle doesn't know the weight per se; it only knows the tension it's generating. By forcing the muscle to contract against maximal resistance at the top and then absorb a heavy load eccentrically, you create high levels of mechanical tension and metabolic stress across all fibers. This leads to more comprehensive fiber recruitment and micro‑trauma, key drivers of hypertrophy.

Personal experience

Mike did not share a personal anecdote, but he trained with Urs at the Arnold and observed him using this technique in person, describing it as 'really super smart.'

What Ers is doing is he's realizing that at the bottom position of the spider curl, the resistance is basically zero. At the top position, the resistance is maximum, but he wants to really milk out the entire force curve of the exercise to be challenged in every component. So when the really hard part at the top starts to hit, he's using his other hand to help that concentric to get the weight up and then he's controlling the eentric on the way down.

Also said
“if he just went to failure raw, he would be like five reps short of failure of the bottom and middle portion actually being challenged at the very top because it's so hard.”— Quantifies the deficit avoided by using assistance.
“there ain't nothing going on. There's no way you're using your delts. It's all biceps, which for people that struggle to connect with their biceps, especially is a really, really smart move.”— Highlights the isolation benefit for mind‑muscle connection.

Non‑PR Intensification Strategy When Strength Dips

WhatOn days when you can't hit PRs due to fatigue, calorie deficit, or psychological slump, shift focus to mind‑muscle connection, higher reps, reduced rest intervals, or rep PRs instead of weight PRs. The goal is to still perform multiple hard sets that stimulate the muscle.
WhenPrimarily during pre‑contest phases or any prolonged deficit where strength recovery is compromised. Also useful on any off day where you feel weak but need to get a quality session in.
DoseDepends on the individual; ensure you're taking sets close enough to failure that they are genuinely hard, using whatever metric that day allows (e.g., more reps, better contraction, shorter rest). No specific rep/set scheme given, but the principle is to autoregulate intensity.
For whomAdvanced lifters in a cutting phase, competitors during contest prep, or anyone who gets mentally derailed when the weights are lower than last week.
WhyMuscle growth is caused by hard sets and sufficient volume, not by setting absolute personal records. Hitting a PR is evidence that growth occurred, not the direct cause. If you can't go heavy, you can still generate the necessary stimulus through alternative intensification methods while avoiding the demotivation of missing numbers.
CaveatsThis isn't a license to slack. You still need to push sets close to failure; the effort must be high. Also, this is a fallback for when progressive overload in load stalls — not a permanent replacement for seeking load increases when possible.

Mike addresses Urs's pre‑contest situation: being very lean makes it hard to increase performance. Urs likely couldn't keep adding weight, so he aimed for a 'PR vibe' in another way — perhaps higher reps or more volume with intense focus. Mike contrasts this with the typical gym‑goer who, seeing a drop in strength, thinks the workout is a waste and trains half‑heartedly. He argues that the ego hit from lower numbers can be as damaging as the physical limitation. The solution is to consciously redefine what 'hard' means for that session. He ties this to his broader philosophy (as implemented in the RP Hypertrophy App) of starting a mesocycle with reps in reserve and progressively adding load or reps, but acknowledging that during a cut autoregulation may require switching tactics. The key message is: never let a lack of load progression derail the entire session; always find a way to challenge the muscle.

Mechanism

Hypertrophy is driven by high‑threshold motor unit recruitment and the accumulation of metabolic stress. Approaching failure with lighter weights and shorter rests can recruit the same high‑threshold fibers as heavy loads, especially when reps are taken to the point where force production declines. Metabolic byproducts from high‑rep sets and short rests also contribute to an anabolic environment. The psychological component is that by shifting focus away from a declining number, you maintain training intensity instead of giving up.

Personal experience

No direct personal story from Mike here, but he frames it as common among pre‑contest athletes and aligns it with the RP app's programming logic.

The real thing that grows muscle isn't necessarily hitting PRs because hitting PRs is evidence of muscle growth. It's not the big cause of muscle growth. The big cause of muscle growth is doing hard sets and enough of them to stimulate your ability to grow muscle.

Also said
“If you can't go hard on weights because your ego is has trouble handling the fact that you're not as strong today, which is a real thing. ... Going hard on focus on mind muscle connection on reps on short rest breaks might be just the thing you need psychologically to continue to plow forward.”— Acknowledges the psychological barrier and proposes a concrete alternative.

Let Go of Arbitrary Body Weight Targets When Dieting

WhatIf during a diet you reach the desired level of leanness at a higher body weight than planned, stop there. Do not try to arbitrarily force the scale down further, as being bigger and leaner is the better outcome. Use the mirror, not the number, as the final arbiter.
WhenDuring any fat loss phase, particularly when the goal is aesthetics or health, and the body is responding well.
DoseNo specific duration; it's a decision point when you look in the mirror and see the desired condition before hitting the planned number.
For whomRecreational dieters, physique athletes, anyone with a flexible body composition goal.
WhyA specific scale weight is often picked somewhat arbitrarily. If you achieve the same (or better) visual result at a higher weight, you've essentially gained muscle during the diet or retained more lean mass, which is a superior outcome. Forcing additional weight loss risks metabolic slowdown, muscle loss, and unnecessary psychological suffering.
CaveatsThis only works if you're honest with yourself about your visual condition. Don't use it as an excuse to end a cut early if you're not actually lean enough. Also, weight class athletes must still make weight, so this advice applies only when weight class is not a factor (like Urs moving to Open or non‑competitors).

Mike connects this directly to Urs's story: Urs had to fight the scale harder than his appearance because the Classic division enforced a weight cap. His best look was above that cap, so the scale was becoming the enemy. For the average person, if you set out to hit 160 lbs but at 168 you're shredded and bigger than ever, that's a massive win. Mike contrasts this with his own experience of extreme hunger at low calories, suggesting that pushing beyond that point is miserable and unproductive. He encourages people to use body weight as a helpful guide but not to become a slave to a number; the visual outcome is what matters.

Personal experience

Mike indirectly shares his own experience by saying he gets hungry on 2,700 kcal and weighs 80 lb less than Urs, implying he knows the misery of overly aggressive dieting. The 'one beer and one potato' joke reinforces his Irish heritage and the point about calorie sensitivity.

If you're just as lean as you wanted to be at 160 at 168, that's the biggest victory of all because when you're bigger and leaner, it's kind of the best thing. So, don't get too attached to body weights.

Also said
“I'm hungry at 2,700 calories and I weigh 80 lb less than whatever. ... But because you're Irish, we just give you one beer and one potato and you're happy.”— Personal anecdote that underscores how low calories can feel and why avoiding unnecessary depth is wise.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

3 items

Urs Kalecinski's Proportions Improved with Massive Size Increase

Contrary to the common worry that adding 35 lb of muscle throws off aesthetics, Mike observes that Urs's lats, arms, chest, and especially quad sweep have grown in a way that enhances his taper and overall look — he looks more aesthetic at 260 lb than at 225.

Why this matters: It challenges the assumption that growing beyond a weight class always sacrifices shape; Urs's genetics allow a rare simultaneous increase in size and aesthetics.

Background

Bodybuilders often fear that gaining too much muscle makes them look blocky or ruins proportions. Urs was previously highly competitive in Classic Physique but was forced to move up because he couldn't make weight without excessive suffering.

Mike points out that when bodybuilders get bigger, proportions can get thrown off. However, looking at side‑by‑side photos, he sees exactly the opposite: Urs's lats billow out further, arms are notably bigger, chest is fuller, and his quad sweep is dramatically improved — 'walking around with a different person's legs.' The consequence is that his waist appears smaller relative to lats and quads, creating an even crazier taper. Mike argues this is a testament to Urs's genetics — his body wants to grow muscle so much that even at 260 lb the added tissue improves his classical proportions. This sets up a unique competitive advantage in the Open division.

Personal experience

Mike and fellow IFBB Pro Jared Feather trained with Urs at the 2025 Arnold Classic when Urs was around 275 lb and already had cross‑striated glutes. Mike saw firsthand how massive yet lean he was, which made the classic weight cutoff seem impossible.

because he has such a huge frame, because his body wants to grow muscle so much, Z is in a position where he's legitimately looking more aesthetic at 260 lb than at 225, 35 lb of well, seemingly just muscle gain cuz his leanness is roughly the same.

Also said
“Scott, look at the difference in quad sweep between those two pictures. >> That's crazy. >> He's like walking around with a different person's legs.”— Emphasises the visual magnitude of the quad growth.
“the smaller your waist, bigger your lats. and bigger your quads, the more of that crazy taper happens.”— Explains the mechanism behind the improved aesthetic.

Mike's Bold Prediction: Urs Will Win the Olympia at 270–280 lb

Mike speculates that Urs's first real off‑season in years has only just begun and that he will step on stage at 270–280 lb with the potential to win the whole Open division.

Why this matters: A concrete, high‑stakes forecast from a well‑known exercise scientist, betting on Urs to dominate the sport's premier event.

Background

Urs placed top three in the Classic division at a previous Mr. Olympia and had 'unfinished business' there, making the switch to Open a reluctant but ultimately necessary move. Mike sees this as just the start of a new trajectory.

Mike argues that Urs is young, ultra‑dedicated, ultra‑intelligent, and patient — traits that combined with his frame and response to training/drugs mean his growth ceiling is still far off. He compares the situation to imagining if Ronnie Coleman had tried to stay in Classic; it simply wouldn't work because his body wanted to be 300+ lb. Mike believes Urs's first Open off‑season is already producing insane results and that the next step is pushing stage weight to 270–280, a size at which he could realistically challenge for the overall title. The underlying logic: the Open division rewards freaky size combined with good shape, and Urs now has both.

I think we're going to see him on stage at closer to 270 and 280 lb. You guys has the potential in my view to win the whole [music]

Also said
“I think Ers is just getting started. He's young. He's in his 20s. He's ultra dedicated, ultra intelligent, ultra competent, and patient.”— Lists the personal qualities that support the prediction.

Urs's Pivot from Classic to Open Was Forced by His Body's Growth Trajectory

Mike speculates that during his off‑season, Urs got so big that the classic weight cut became impractical, leading him and his coach to pivot to Open — a smart decision given his appearance at the higher weight.

Why this matters: Provides insight into the behind‑the‑scenes calculus elite bodybuilders make when their physique outgrows a division.

Background

The IFBB Classic Physique division has strict height‑to‑weight caps. Urs previously struggled to make weight, and his post‑show maintenance rebound already exceeded the limit. Mike and Jared saw at the Arnold that at 275 lb and fairly lean, dropping 45 lb to make classic was nearly impossible.

Mike explains that Urs was in contention for the Classic title, finishing top three the previous year, so he had a strong incentive to stay. However, the human body sometimes just wants to get bigger, especially with the standard pro drug and food protocols and Urs's genetics. During the off‑season, Urs likely ballooned to a point where the cut would be excessively miserable — reminiscent of the hunger Mike experienced on 2,700 kcal while weighing 80 lb less. The pivot to Open was therefore a logical response to his physique's natural trajectory, not a failure of planning. Mike approves of the decision, noting that it allowed Urs to present his best look.

Personal experience

Mike and Jared saw Urs at 275 lb with striated glutes, making it clear a classic cut was unrealistic; Urs laughed off the idea of dropping 45 lb.

I think what ended up happening to Z... is I think through his off season, which we were just caught him at the beginning of his offseason, I think he got so big that he was like, uh, this ain't happening. And him and his coach made a pivot, which I think is a super super smart decision.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

1 item

Watch Urs Kalecinski's YouTube Channel for Mental Drive

Practice

To find the mental effort to push hard in the gym, watch videos of elite bodybuilders like Urs. His channel is described as amazing and can motivate you to train with intensity.

At the conclusion of the video, Mike says the RP app can help with program design but won't give you the mental fortitude to go hard. He recommends watching 'a bunch of video' and specifically praises Urs Kalecinski's YouTube channel as a resource to follow. This is a common bodybuilding tactic: observing how high‑level athletes train, their seriousness and effort, can be contagious and psych you up before a session. No further detail is given, just a straightforward shoutout.

vs alternatives

Implicitly compared to hiring a coach or relying purely on self‑discipline; video is a free and easily accessible mental stimulant.

What it won't help you do is find that mental effort to go hard. For that, just watch a bunch of video. He has an amazing uh YouTube channel which you should follow him on.

Find Watch
Disclosed sponsorships2speaker disclosed

Element Hydration Beverage

Supplement Sponsored · disclosed

To maintain hydration and energy during workouts, preventing fatigue so you never hit a 'speed bump' and can train harder and longer. Presented as a serious alternative to a humorous scenario of hitting on a 'muscle mommy' for an energy boost.

DisclosureMike promotes it as a sponsor; says 'Link in description, code in bio', typical paid promotion.

Mike weaves an ad into a comedic skit about approaching a 'muscle mommy' at the gym for a pick‑me‑up. He contrasts that with 'investing in a hydration beverage that has the proper combination of electrolytes and fluid volumes and tastes great as well to keep you ultra hydrated through the session to make sure that you never even hit that speed bump.' The underlying message is that proper hydration with electrolytes can improve performance and reduce mid‑session fatigue. He does not go into scientific specifics about the sodium, potassium, etc., content but trusts the brand. The ad is light‑hearted but the recommendation is clear: drink Element to stay hydrated and train better.

vs alternatives

The presented alternative is the comic idea of flirting with a 'muscle mommy' for an adrenaline rush, which is obviously not a real alternative. Implied comparison to plain water or skipping hydration altogether — Element provides a more complete electrolyte profile.

Personal experience

No direct personal experience stated; the entire segment is a fictional comic scenario.

Or you could invest in a hydration beverage. that has the proper combination of electrolytes and fluid volumes and tastes great as well to keep you ultra hydrated through the session to make sure that you never even hit that speed bump.

Also said
“Link in description, code in bio or whatever I'm supposed to say.”— Confirms the affiliated sponsorship relationship.
Find Element

RP Hypertrophy App

Tool Sponsored · disclosed

A training app that builds periodized mesocycles for hypertrophy. It provides pre‑made templates and allows full customization of exercise selection, volume prioritization for lagging muscles, and automatically progresses weight/reps each week, then signals when a recovery session is needed.

DisclosureMike is co‑founder of RP Strength; he says 'Click on the link in the description of this video to get started.'

Mike explains that the app embodies his preferred training philosophy: start the first week of a mesocycle with a few reps in reserve, then increase weight or reps each session to hit PRs. The app automates this, choosing the right overload each day and prompting deloads when performance stalls — like Urs might have needed during pre‑contest when strength wasn't climbing. The app also allows you to prioritize or deprioritize any muscle, select exact exercises, and customize volumes at every step, making it adaptable to individual goals. Mike positions it as the fastest way to generate a tailored workout plan, though he acknowledges it can't provide the mental drive to train hard; that you must bring yourself or find elsewhere.

vs alternatives

He claims it's 'faster than any other training software allows,' but does not name competitors. The main alternative is manual programming, which the app automates.

Personal experience

Mike doesn't share a personal story but refers to the app's logic as 'what we do with the RP Hypertrophy app,' implying he uses and develops it.

the RP hypertrophy app has dozens of pre‑made workout templates to help you build a plan faster than any other training software allows. But you can customize each plant exactly to your needs by prioritizing and deprioritizing any muscles you'd like to train, choosing the exact exercises you'd like to use, and customizing the volumes you employ at every single step of the process.

Find RP

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

4 items
because he has such a huge frame, because his body wants to grow muscle so much, Z is in a position where he's legitimately looking more aesthetic at 260 lb than at 225, 35 lb of well, seemingly just muscle gain cuz his leanness is roughly the same.
A rare and striking claim that mass gain improved aesthetics, defying conventional wisdom.
I think we're going to see him on stage at closer to 270 and 280 lb. You guys has the potential in my view to win the whole [music]
A bold, specific prediction from a well‑known expert that Urs could become Mr. Olympia champion.
The real thing that grows muscle isn't necessarily hitting PRs because hitting PRs is evidence of muscle growth. It's not the big cause of muscle growth. The big cause of muscle growth is doing hard sets and enough of them to stimulate your ability to grow muscle.
Reframes a sacred gym belief—chasing PRs—as a proxy, not the mechanism, with direct implications for how to train during a cut.
If you're just as lean as you wanted to be at 160 at 168, that's the biggest victory of all because when you're bigger and leaner, it's kind of the best thing.
Reverses the typical scale‑fixation of dieters, offering a liberating reframe.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

urs-kalecinskiclassic-physique-weight-capopen-bodybuildingmuscle-gain-proportionsmike-israetel-predictionarnold-classic-2025assisted-rep-techniquespider-curlmind-muscle-connectiontraining-hard-without-prspre-contest-dietmacros-2-weeks-outhydration-electrolytesrp-hypertrophy-appbody-weight-goalsgerman-bodybuildermuscle-mommy-humorelement-sponsorship
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.