UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Why GROM are the most dangerous men in Poland? Arek "Motyl" Dembiński
~100 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Why GROM are the most dangerous men in Poland? Arek "Motyl" Dembiński

Cyprian Majcher
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

GROM's elite status stems from its SAS/Delta Force-derived culture where senior operators, regardless of rank, lead mission planning, and every operator can voice dissent — a stark contrast to ordinary Polish military hierarchy.

2

Arek Dembiński served as an instructor who personally enforced meritocratic selection when a general tried to push an unqualified candidate; he argues that only commanders raised inside GROM understand what makes the unit lethal.

3

Now a civilian, Dembiński voluntarily visits uniformed schools to inspire youth, crediting his own interviews with pushing a candidate through selection, and nearly re-enlisted after seeing GROM's evolution (organic Black Hawks, Super Warrior care) but chose financial stability.

4

He distills operator-derived personal security: carry pepper spray/stun gun, check car tires for sabotage, stand against elevator walls, use loud social disruption to deter stalkers, and teach children scream-throw-GPS drills — all backed by visceral anecdotes.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

5 items

Realistic combat training – train as you would fight

WhatConduct training in conditions as close to combat as possible: use training ammunition (FX), replicate real rooms 1:1, and create ambushes so brutal that participants treat them as a real threat.
WhenAt every stage of mission preparation, especially before deploying to the area of operations.
DoseThousands of hours of repetitions in the section, until achieving unconditional automatism.
For whomSpecial forces operators; civilian shooters can adopt on a smaller scale.
WhyThe more sweat in training, the less blood in battle — reflexive action under fire prevents hesitation, because all procedures were tested under extreme stress.
CaveatsRequires a controlled environment and a professional OPFOR team; without them, participants can be exposed to real danger.

Dembiński quotes the maxim he heard from older colleagues after joining GROM: 'train as you would fight'. He describes how the aggressor team arranged ambushes so creatively that they seemed impossible in a real fight — and yet the guys fell into them. When the commander wanted to prove to another unit that he wasn't going easy on his own, he invited them to watch the OPFOR. After it ended, they said: 'No, well, you did go easy on us after all'. Thanks to this culture, Dembiński himself, entering rooms with charges, had a 'one-to-one replication' of real combat. The effect was confirmed when he was hit by three bullets: no one from his team gave up, everyone executed the procedures 'just as we were trained'. He notes that working with FX and constant exposure to high-fidelity simulations means that 'I practically did a 1 to 1 reflection'.

Mechanism

Training in combat-like conditions encodes procedural memory sequences so deeply that under extreme stress inhibiting the prefrontal cortex, the soldier relies on learned patterns, not conscious analysis.

Personal experience

As a wounded man in the fight, he saw that his section mates did not deviate from procedures, even though the enemy kept shooting; the whole team acted as in training, which saved his life.

Train as you would fight. The more sweat spilled, the less blood in battle.

Also said
“This was before entering Afghanistan. And they set it up for us. It was such an ambush that, simply, in terms of the forces and means engaged for the OPFOR, I don't know if in a real situation we had such, you know, such forces on the opposing side... And those guys ... said: 'No, well, you did go easy on us after all'.”— Proves that the exercises were harder than reality, which eliminated shock on the battlefield.
“Even at the moment when I was wounded, no one from my team gave up. Everyone carried out the entire procedure just as we were trained. ... no one doubted. Everyone, you know, went just as we were trained, 100% everything worked.”— Personal confirmation of the effectiveness of this approach in real combat.

Checking tires before every drive

WhatBefore getting into the car, you walk around the vehicle and kick each tire to make sure it is not damaged or has no devices planted under it.
WhenEvery time, before you drive off from a parking lot, especially when the car was parked in a public place.
DoseA few seconds for the walk-around.
For whomEvery driver desiring elementary safety habits.
WhyPrevents kidnapping by sabotage (e.g., punctured tires, flashbang charge) – criminals 'pull' the driver after forcing him to stop.
CaveatsDoes not give 100% certainty with advanced charges, but eliminates the simplest traps.

Dembiński himself has been applying this ritual for years and posts videos on Instagram, where people laugh – but he replies that he has reasons for it. He describes two incidents: a friend had a loud flashbang charge (a firecracker?) planted, after the explosion the driver jumped out, and a second criminal jumped behind the wheel and drove off. Another friend had his tires slashed to immobilize the car and assault him. These cases made him routinely kick every tire. He extends this habit to other means of transport – 'people wrote to me asking if I also walk around a tram like that, a train'. He emphasizes that it's not paranoia, just a simple safeguard against a real scenario.

Personal experience

Dembiński himself experienced (or was close to) a situation with a planted charge – he doesn't specify if he was one of the affected friends. He says: 'I had a case, and it's true, that they planted something under a buddy's car...'

I walk around the car and kick every tire, and once, like that... I had a case where someone planted something under a buddy's car... He starts moving, there's a loud bang, he jumps out of the car. What's happening? The second one jumps in, closes the door, drives off with the car.

Also said
“Another buddy ... had his tires slashed, right? They simply wanted to take him down. He checked, I said: 'Oh, no, what luck'.”— A second case confirming the attack pattern via vehicle immobilization.

Safe elevator entry – back to the wall

WhatWhen entering an elevator, you take a position with your back to the wall to see all doors and have no one behind you.
WhenEvery time you enter an elevator, especially when there are other entrances or corridors around.
DoseImmediately after entering – press yourself against the opposite wall and observe.
For whomEveryone, especially women and people frequently moving around residential buildings.
WhyEliminates the blind spot – no one can approach from behind, pull you into the elevator, or hit you; you have a full 360° field of view.
CaveatsIn an elevator with multiple doors, you need a wall that provides visibility of all entrances.

Dembiński illustrates this in the studio: 'Here you have doors, behind me are doors, and the elevator is on your side. I go to that wall, because I stand with my back and see what's happening. If I stand by the wall, look, I see these doors, these doors behind me, and the elevator when it opens, so that no one comes out and surprises you.' He explains that an attacker can come out from behind and pull you into the elevator, or someone might already be in the elevator and want to kidnap you. Standing by the wall, you are aware of every movement and limit variables. He instilled this tactical habit in himself and teaches it in security training. People laugh at it, but he treats it as seriously as checking the car.

I go to that wall, because I stand with my back and see what's happening. If I stand by the wall, look, I see these doors, these doors behind me, and the elevator when it opens, so that no one comes out and surprises you. ... you see 360, right?

Also said
“The elevator is key in this sense, what can happen in an elevator. A guy can come out. He can pull you in. He can come out from behind these doors and throw you into the elevator.”— A list of specific threats that this simple maneuver protects against.

Stalker surprise tactic – a loud, embarrassing statement

WhatWhen you are being followed on the street and have no other option, turn around and loudly say a sentence that will cause embarrassment or consternation in the attacker (e.g., 'Yesterday I found out I have AIDS').
WhenIn a situation where changing sides of the street and zigzagging did not stop the person following you.
DoseOne sentence spoken loudly.
For whomWomen and people without physical defense means.
WhySurprises and disorients; breaks the dynamics of a typical attack, and public shaming often makes the attacker give up.
CaveatsEffectiveness depends on the surrounding culture; may not work at night on an empty street.

Dembiński tells the story of his wife: she was walking with a friend, four men behind them. One said to another: 'you take that one, and we take that one'. She had no pepper spray or anything. His wife turned around and shouted at the top of her voice: 'You know what, yesterday I found out I have AIDS. What should I do?'. The men immediately stopped and disappeared. Dembiński emphasizes that his wife was not trained by him – she came up with it on the spot. He himself has been teaching people for years in training that in the absence of physical tools, creativity counts. Anticipating that someone is following you, after changing sidewalks and confirming you are being followed, such a disruption can be more effective than running away, because you won't run faster on foot.

Personal experience

A direct account from his wife's life, which he treats as an instructive case study.

Out loud, at the top of your voice. You know what, yesterday I found out I have AIDS. ... The guys are gone.

Also said
“And one says to the other, you take that one, and we take that one. And there's no pepper spray, there's nothing. What does she do? Out loud, at the top of her voice. ... They look back. The guys are gone.”— Shows the sequence of events and the immediate effect.
“She came up with it on the spot.”— Proves that you don't need a learned technique, just a bit of cleverness.

Training children in kidnapping response

WhatTeach children: to scream loudly, throw their backpack at the attacker, carry small coins to throw upwards into the face, walk in groups of 2-3, and immediately call 112, taking photos of the car and license plates.
WhenPreventively, as a permanent element of school and home education.
DoseRegular exercises, preferably with an instructor; the child always has a GPS chip on them.
For whomParents of school-age children.
WhyA child is physically defenseless; a surprising action (throwing a backpack, scattering coins) gives a fraction of a second to escape, and a group makes it impossible to catch everyone at once.
CaveatsPepper spray is risky – children may use it irresponsibly, e.g., at school, forcing an evacuation (described case).

Dembiński bases this on observations from Israel, where children are taught to throw their backpack so it falls on the attacker, and how to throw small change 'from bottom to top' so it doesn't fall but hits the face – this gives a fraction of a second. He emphasizes that children should walk in groups of 2-3, because with a group of kidnappers, at least one can always run away and raise the alarm. He recommends using a GPS tracker (chip in shoes), because 'children are unaware'. He advises against pepper spray: one child sprayed it at school, the whole common room had to be evacuated, and another sprayed grandma because they didn't want to go with her. Instead – 112 and immediately take photos of the car. He tells of a case of four drugged children being transported through Poland – the police stopped the car by chance before the mother in Spain could report the kidnapping. Teaching children these procedures can mean the perpetrator doesn't have time to disappear.

Personal experience

He himself visits schools and explains the 112 alarm system, and also cites the story of a child who used pepper spray at school, which shows the risk.

For example, you carry small change, pennies. For example, a zloty in pennies, and someone approaches, you throw them from bottom to top, you have to throw so the money doesn't fall, but hits him in the face, and when he gets hit, you have a fraction of a second to run away.

Also said
“Children should preferably walk in twos, threes, so that one can notify if something happens. Remember, if there are three children and, for example, two or three kidnappers, they won't catch all of them, because one, for example, has to have the car running, right? One child can run away.”— Group logistics that realistically hinder kidnapping.
“I already had one case where a child sprayed pepper spray at school and they had to evacuate, you know, the whole common room.”— A warning against giving children pepper spray.
“When I was in Israel, for example, children are taught to throw, taught to scream and throw backpacks, because you have to throw the backpack properly, because if you throw the backpack, it falls, and they learn how to throw the backpack at the guy charging at you.”— An international example of good practices.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

4 items

Post-service school visits to inspire military enlistment

Dembiński, unpaid, now visits military-oriented high schools, showing gear and sharing stories to counteract declining enrollment; a recent selection candidate credited Dembiński's interviews for his mental fortitude.

Why this matters: Former GROM operator proactively reversing the 'snowflake generation' narrative by directly inspiring youth, with measurable impact on actual GROM selections.

Background

He was a teacher in uniformed classes for 5 years; last year 50% of his class joined WOT instead, whereas previously only 2% left. The drop in candidates for special forces makes this engagement critical.

After leaving GROM, Dembiński taught in military-oriented schools and saw enthusiasm wane towards elite units. Instead of complaining, he set a goal for the next year to visit at least one such school per month across Poland, entirely self-funded. He describes how seeing a GROM operator in person as a young soldier had compelled him to strive for the unit; he wants to create the same spark. During a Young Generation meeting organized by the Ministry of Defence, he learned that a candidate who passed the grueling selection cited watching 'Młoty Lewy' interviews (including possibly his) as the inspiration that mentally prepared him. He already demonstrated his own equipment and took top students to the GROM Hall of Traditions, which he says 'opened their eyes'. He plans a large event to bring 1,000 military-class students to Warsaw.

Personal experience

He recounts his own moment of awe seeing a GROM operator and thinking 'What am I doing in 1st Special Regiment?' That drove him to attempt selection. He draws a direct parallel: when he shows students his personal rifles and gear, their eyes widen — 'they are already mentally prepared' to aim for GROM, not just any military service.

I set myself a goal that next year I want to organize a very big event. 1000 children from uniformed classes. I want them to come to Warsaw.

Also said
“A lady from Polska Zbrojna ... told me that there was a selection recently and after the selection she asked one of the participants how it happened that he wanted to join GROM? And he ... said? That he watched interviews with Młoty Lewy.”— Shows direct real-world impact of these media appearances and school visits on actual GROM selection success.
“I myself know how it worked on me. When I saw a GROM operator, I said: 'What am I doing here in the 1st Regiment, right? What am I doing here?'”— Personal transformation that he now seeks to replicate in the next generation.

Near return to GROM after seeing its modernisation

Two or three years ago Dembiński announced he would return to the unit, attracted by the Super Warrior programme, organic Black Hawks, and overall modernization, but ultimately stayed out due to personal finances.

Why this matters: A former operator publicly admitting a strong pull to re-enlist, then rationally choosing against it — offers a raw view of the tension between identity and post-service life.

Background

After medical discharge and years as a civilian, he struggled with loss of the operator identity. He threw himself into shooting sports, burning through ammunition and money trying to replicate his old training volume.

Dembiński openly says that two or three years ago he declared 'I'm going back to GROM'. He saw online footage of the unit's new capabilities — the embedded Black Hawks, the holistic Super Warrior support — and felt the pull intensely. However, he had built other income streams (clubs, training) and returning would not make financial sense. His wife understood but he acknowledges the difficult first years after leaving: 'I still wanted to be a commando'. He recognizes that the unit keeps advancing, and his shooting test scores now wouldn't pass current standards, which demonstrates how far training has evolved.

Personal experience

He describes his post-service attempt to replicate military shooting habits: after one month he had spent 10,000 PLN on ammunition, realizing the unit had previously funded all that. He laughingly says he then grabbed his head and thought 'There's something I need to change'. This financial shock highlights the hidden cost of the operator lifestyle.

Two or three years ago I said I'm going back to the unit. No, I'm saying, I'm going back. Damn, you know, now these thoughts came to me, I was looking somewhere on the internet at the guys, I'm saying I'm going back. ... I have too many other things set up to go back, but really when I saw that, you know, again I said you have to feel the return to, you know, to service, to those special forces, right?

Also said
“I don't pass the shooting tests, the ones they have now. ... I don't pass everything, so you have to know what level they are at, how it all evolved, right?”— Admission that even a former operator cannot match current GROM shooting standards, underscoring the unit's drastic improvement.
“The first years after I left were the worst. Even though I, you know, ran some clubs and at Nastula's there was kickboxing and K1 and Crafmage, it was still hard, you know. Still, the man wanted to be that commando all the time.”— Emphasizes the identity crisis many veterans face after leaving elite units.

GROM's Super Warrior programme mirrors top-tier athlete care

The Super Warrior programme now integrates dieticians, physiotherapists, mental conditioning, and load monitoring, akin to NBA athlete support, with operators burning 6,000–12,000 kcal per day.

Why this matters: Reveals that GROM has adopted elite sports science methods that were pioneered by Delta Force over 15 years ago, with concrete metabolic data that shocked researchers.

Background

Traditionally, special forces focused on sheer toughness; now, just like NBA teams, GROM provides individualised nutrition labels, cryotherapy, rehab exercises, and sensor-based blast overpressure monitoring (still not universal in Polish forces).

Dembiński recalls when a professor measured caloric burn: police ZBO operators peaked at 6,000 kcal while GROM operators routinely hit 6,000 and one record reached 12,000 kcal. The professor initially thought his equipment was broken. He compares it to Delta Facility food stations with labelled macros, and notes that Delta had blast sensors in Afghanistan 15-20 years ago that triggered immediate medical checks after an IED. Now GROM operators have rehab specialists who prescribe 'silly-looking but effective' exercises using balls and bands, which he himself uses for his injured leg and posts on Instagram despite mockery. The programme has pushed the cost of training an operator well beyond the old estimate of 1 million dollars.

Personal experience

Dembiński himself now uses specialised exercises for his gunshot leg that target previously neglected muscle groups, and he admits that as a serving operator he would download his own programs online — today the unit provides all that for free.

The record holder had 12,000 calories, that he burned 12,000 calories. Can you imagine that? ... he interrupted the study because he thought his device had simply broken.

Also said
“Delta guys had this already 10 years ago, or even more. Where 10? I think it's already 15, maybe 20 years ago. They also had special sensors in Afghanistan. When an IED exploded next to them, this sensor measured what energy passed through. And immediately when they returned to base, they were already waiting for them at the base for tests.”— Shows the gap that GROM is now closing and how Delta's long-standing bio-monitoring is only now reaching Polish operators.
“Now it's like this. A physiotherapist in the unit ... a lot of elements that operators can afford go to the physiotherapist ... The guys in the unit are already doing it too. They have a physiotherapist who shows them exercises and it doesn't have to be a barbell, just, you know, on a ball or something and so on.”— Detail that highlights the shift from rough soldiering to precise, individualized injury prevention.

GROM is the only special forces unit in the world with its own organic helicopters

Dembiński states that unlike Delta, SAS, or Navy SEALs, GROM has its own Black Hawk helicopters integrated directly into the unit, not a separate aviation regiment.

Why this matters: A bold claim that suggests GROM's unique force structure, potentially verified by the 35th-anniversary publication he cites.

Background

Typically, US Tier 1 units rely on the 160th SOAR for rotary-wing support. GROM, however, operates its own Black Hawks, which streamlines mission planning.

Dembiński discovered this fact in a special magazine he bought for the 35th GROM anniversary. He exclaims that it's 'the only one in the world' — even Delta, SAS, Navy SEALs lack organic helicopter capability. He recounts that during his service, a hostage rescue could not be executed because GROM lacked helicopters; now the unit's own Black Hawks increase operational autonomy. This structural evolution was one of the factors that made him want to return.

The GROM military unit is the only one in the world. The only one. Not even Delta, nor SEALs, nor any others, nor SAS has helicopters in its structure.

Also said
“So, because these Black Hawks are here, you know, in one, and not in a squadron. And when it comes to American special forces, they have 160 SOAR, right? So that unit, you know, which provides support, and we have it here, so you know, so when I saw those helicopters, and something else, I said, no, I'm going back.”— Explains the operational logic and why this integration is so rare even among top-tier formations.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

5 items

Pepper spray

Tool

Dembiński directly recommends women carry pepper spray as the easiest self-defense tool requiring no fighting skills.

Compared to a baton, it does not require knowledge of striking points and minimizes legal risk. It works at a distance and gives about 10 seconds of disorientation – enough to run away. He confirms that modern pepper spray is 'good' and that even a child should have a different solution, because unskilled use of spray in a closed space can cause evacuation (the school case).

vs alternatives

With a baton you have to 'know what to hit', and an unskilled person can hurt themselves or have a court case; pepper spray and a stun gun are simpler and safer to use.

Pepper spray, that is, gas. ... with a baton you have to know what to hit, how to hit, because you'll still have a court case. And if you use gas, he is, let's say, for 5-10 seconds … unaware of what happened and you can run away.

Find Pepper

Stun gun with shooting probes

Tool

Recommended as a complement to pepper spray – especially in situations requiring immobilization of the attacker without physical contact.

Dembiński notes that a modern stun gun can shoot probes at 3.5 m and after releasing the button, it holds the attacker under voltage for an additional 5 seconds, giving a total of about 10 seconds. You don't need to touch the aggressor, which reduces the risk for the victim. He recommends stun guns with this function, not those requiring direct contact.

vs alternatives

A contact stun gun is less effective at maintaining distance; whereas pepper spray in a closed room can harm the defender.

A stun gun … shoots at 3.5 meters, you know, and then he is at 3.5 meters for 10 seconds, when you release it, it still holds the guy under voltage for another 5 seconds, that is time for you to run away.

Also said
“There are different systems, like in schools, so, so it all evolved, right.”— Indicates that technology has advanced and it's worth looking for the latest solutions.
Find Stun

GPS tracker for a child (chip in shoe / pendant)

Tool

Dembiński recommends discreet GPS trackers that a child can wear without their knowledge, so that in case of kidnapping or disappearance, you immediately know their route.

He talks about 'chips that also attach to phones', and then specifies that there are different variants – 'chips even in shoes, so that children are unaware'. He emphasizes that thanks to such devices, a parent sees the child's route and can track them. He doesn't give a specific model, but encourages buying them as a security element alongside teaching screaming and throwing a backpack.

vs alternatives

Without a tracker, finding a child after a kidnapping depends mainly on witnesses and the speed of 112; a chip reduces reaction time to minutes.

There are also such chips, they attach to phones. I don't know what they are. There are not only for phones, there are different variants of security, that you see what route your child takes, you can track them, follow them, and so on.

Also said
“These chips can even be in shoes, so that children are unaware.”— A hint that the tracker should be hidden, which prevents the kidnapper from quickly removing it.
Find GPS

American sports supplements (e.g., BSN, MuscleTech, Mesomorph)

Supplement

Dembiński recalls that as a soldier he ordered American supplements at 50% military discount, achieving very high form, but warns that some (like Mesomorph) contain derivatives banned in the EU.

During his service years, he and his colleagues ordered supplements from the USA that were not available in Poland. Many of them, especially pre-workouts, had a much stronger effect than European equivalents – strength and endurance went sharply up. He personally used Mesomorph and only after noticing 'trips' did he check the composition – it turned out to contain a substance that is an amphetamine derivative banned in Europe. He had to stop immediately. He emphasizes that officially steroids were absolutely forbidden, and using them could hinder hemorrhage control and cause depression upon withdrawal, so no sensible person took them. Supplements, however, they took in bulk – sometimes 10 different ones a day. Today GROM has its own dieticians, so individual ordering from the USA is no longer necessary.

vs alternatives

European supplements were much weaker; American ones could unknowingly expose one to breaking anti-doping rules and burden mental health upon withdrawal.

Personal experience

He himself ordered and used 'MuscleTech, BSN and so on', and from Mesomorph he had 'crazy trips' and stopped it after checking the composition.

I remember there was Mesomorph. I ordered it, I didn't even know there was a derivative, I think, in there, and it turned out I had to stop taking that supplement, because there were some crazy trips after it, you know? Strength went up, everything went up. Then I look, I have, you know, and trips, no, and I say something's wrong. I start searching the internet, these supplements weren't available in Poland, and suddenly it turns out it's sold there, but in Poland and Europe it's banned.

Also said
“And I remember that when we trained, when I took these supplements, because it was even 10 supplements, you know, at once, right? Well, the form was, I wish you that. I came back, I had doping tests at the Polish Championships, and I was in such form that my coach in the Polish national team told me: 'You're in the 86 category, and you have better conditioning than those in 71'.”— Shows the performance jump these supplements gave, and that it wasn't doping (he passed tests).
Find American

Magazine for the 35th anniversary of GROM (special edition)

Book

Dembiński bought this publication before the conversation as preparatory material and discovered in it the information about the helicopters that surprised him – he recommends it as a source of knowledge about the unit.

It was an album/magazine published for the unit's 35th anniversary. Dembiński acquired it purposefully to prepare for the interview, and claims it contained not only photos but also structural facts – including the unique information that GROM is the only one with its own Black Hawks. He doesn't give the title, but it can be assumed it's the official anniversary publication.

Personal experience

He admits that he read this particular piece of information from the magazine and specially bought it before the conversation.

I bought myself, specially before this conversation, I bought such a magazine, there is one for the 35th anniversary of GROM, I don't remember the name, ... and I also read this information there, that it is the only one in the world.

Find Magazine

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

5 items
Train as you would fight. The more sweat spilled, the less blood in battle.
His personal maxim instilled by older operators, which defined GROM's training culture.
Motyl, everyone has to pass selection normally. ... this one and this one, look, the number, it's from a certain general. He was here in the unit today for a visit and said that he has to pass, you know, selection... And I say: 'What do you mean he has to pass?' He says: 'Well Motyl, well, he has to pass normally, just like you passed'. So I already knew what was going on.
Reveals an attempt at political pressure on selection and the subtle language of corruption – shows how the instructor interprets 'normally'.
Delta guys had this already 10 years ago, or even more. Where 10? I think it's already 15, maybe 20 years ago. They also had special sensors in Afghanistan. When an IED exploded next to them, this sensor measured what energy passed through. And immediately when they returned to base, they were already waiting for them at the base for tests.
Illustrates the technological gap between Delta Force and the rest of the world, which GROM is only now catching up on.
They didn't want to have girls, women, because it's a different treatment. They didn't want to have daughters – they simply threw them into the pool, meaning they killed them normally. Just normally, if she could swim, she swam, if not, then not.
A shocking description of the Taliban's treatment of girls, exposing the level of bestiality the operators faced.
The only one in the world. The only one. Not even Delta, nor SEALs, nor any others, nor SAS has helicopters in its structure.
A surprising claim about GROM's uniqueness, which will be completely new to many listeners.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

grom-historysas-delta-influenceselection-processgrom-cultureoperator-trainingsuper-warrior-programcaloric-expendituresupplement-usemission-planningcapture-vs-killroad-ambush-fearpsychological-traumaveteran-carecivilian-gun-ownershippersonal-security-tipschild-safetytaliban-brutalitymissing-childrengrom-helicoptersrefusal-mission
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.