UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Alternate High Protein Days & Low Protein Days to Drop Fat & Build Muscle
~47 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Alternate High Protein Days & Low Protein Days to Drop Fat & Build Muscle

Thomas DeLauer
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Alternating high-protein and low-protein days may increase 'protein sensitivity,' much like carb restriction improves insulin sensitivity, potentially enhancing muscle growth and fat loss.

2

Research studies on intermittent caloric restriction and alternate-day fasting show muscle preservation despite weight loss, possibly due to anabolic rebound and mTOR priming after protein restriction.

3

Thomas DeLauer personally drops his protein intake to around 50g on occasional days to 'resensitize' his system, then compensates on other days for a rebound effect.

4

Sponsored: Element Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, magnesium) is his go-to for appetite control during fasting or low-calorie periods — free sample pack link in description.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

1 item

Occasional Low-Protein Days

WhatReduce daily protein intake to about 50g (or significantly lower than normal) for one or two days per week or month, then return to high protein on other days to trigger an anabolic rebound.
WhenA couple days a week or a couple days a month, as needed. No strict schedule, but 'occasionally sensitizing yourself.'
DoseDrop protein to around 50 grams on that day (for DeLauer, who normally consumes 200-300g). For others, proportionally reduce.
For whomIndividuals who consistently eat high protein daily (e.g., bodybuilders, fitness enthusiasts) and may be desensitized; also those seeking autophagy benefits without full fasting.
WhyTo resensitize the body to protein, enhance muscle protein synthesis upon refeeding, induce autophagy, and improve digestive breaks.
CaveatsDo not extend the low-protein period too long to avoid muscle loss; compensate with higher protein on other days to achieve the rebound effect. Not for those with high protein requirements due to medical conditions. The concept is theoretical but supported by some research.

DeLauer presents this protocol as a practical application of the protein sensitivity concept. He reasons that if constant protein intake might blunt the muscle-building signal, occasional low-protein days could act as a 'reset.' During the low day, mTOR is suppressed, autophagy ramps up, and the body may upregulate amino acid recycling to spare muscle. When high protein is resumed, the surge in mTOR, IGF-1, and testosterone responsiveness drives a super-compensatory anabolic rebound, leading to greater net muscle protein synthesis than if protein was kept uniformly high. He supports this with the bolus-study evidence that longer gaps between protein feedings increase aggregate muscle protein synthesis, and with intermittent fasting research showing muscle preservation despite reduced calories and lower anabolic hormones. He personally implements this by dropping from 200-300g down to 50g on select days, noting it also feels good digestively.

Mechanism

Reducing protein intake decreases circulating amino acids and insulin, which lowers mTORC1 activity and stimulates autophagy. This clears misfolded proteins and damaged organelles, making cells more efficient. Simultaneously, the body increases proteostatic mechanisms to recycle amino acids, preventing muscle breakdown. Upon reintroduction of a large protein bolus, the combination of primed mTOR signaling and heightened amino acid transporter expression leads to a potentiated anabolic response, similar to the 'anabolic rebound' observed after short-term fasting. DeLauer also speculates that short-term suppression of testosterone and IGF-1 during low-protein periods may increase receptor sensitivity, so the same hormonal signal triggers a bigger effect when protein returns.

Personal experience

He says, 'I'm eating two to 300 grams of protein a day, which means that maybe I'm getting very desensitized to that. So, I've occasionally said, "Okay, I'm just going to drop my protein down to like 50 grams today and I'm not going to waste away and I'm going to do that to sort of cleanse the system a little bit."'

it would be maybe taking one or two days out of the week or out of the month or whatever, occasionally sensitizing yourself to protein.

Also said
“by periodically restricting protein, we could be on to something. Just make sure that you're compensating for it during the full assist so you can actually get that rebound effect.”— Reinforces the importance of compensation on other days.
“If you go periods of time decreasing protein, you might be able to increase [autophagy] a little bit more. You can also promote the reutilization of amino acids.”— Adds autophagy rationale.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

4 items

protein sensitivity as a novel concept

The idea that short-term protein restriction could make the body more sensitive to protein's anabolic effects, analogous to how carb restriction improves insulin sensitivity.

Why this matters: Challenges the prevailing high-protein-every-day dogma; offers a potential explanation for muscle preservation in intermittent fasting protocols.

DeLauer argues that the fitness world pushes constant protein consumption, but that like with carbohydrates, taking a break could make the body respond more robustly when protein is reintroduced. He draws parallels to how calorie or carb restriction improves insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, citing a 1969 Lancet study showing starvation increased glucose tolerance independent of weight loss. He hypothesizes that if prolonged fasting leads to better fuel utilization, then short protein breaks could lead to better protein utilization, triggering an 'anabolic rebound' with surges in testosterone, IGF, and mTOR activation. He ties this to the observed muscle sparing in intermittent fasting studies, where despite lower total calories and even decreases in anabolic hormones, muscle mass is preserved, likely due to heightened sensitivity upon refeeding. The concept is new and speculative but backed by studies on alternate-day fasting, intermittent caloric restriction, and bolus protein feeding patterns.

Personal experience

He mentions that he personally eats 200-300g protein daily, which might be desensitizing him, so he occasionally drops to 50g to 'cleanse the system' and feel better digestively.

if abstaining from carbohydrates occasionally makes us more insulin sensitive, would potentially abstaining from protein for short periods of time make us more protein sensitive?

Also said
“by periodically restricting protein, we could be on to something.”— Summarizes the thesis and potential benefit.
“the theory is that there's a protein sparing effect... by occasionally taking away protein, just like occasionally fasting, you actually train the body to be okay with lower amounts of protein.”— Expands on how the adaptation works.
“there's this thing called the anabolic rebound which happens after staying away from food for a while and then refeeding... muscles soak things up and you potentially have more anabolic effect.”— Explains the proposed mechanism for improved gains.

muscle sparing with intermittent protein restriction

Studies show that alternating low-calorie or low-protein days with normal/high intake preserves muscle mass better than continuous calorie restriction, even when losing weight.

Why this matters: Contradicts the fear that skipping protein leads to muscle loss; provides evidence for the anabolic rebound theory.

DeLauer reviews multiple studies: an alternate-day fasting study (Nutrition Journal) where subjects ate 25% of calories one day and ad libitum the next, losing more weight but no muscle loss compared to controls; an intermittent caloric restriction study where fluctuating low and high calorie days preserved more muscle than steady restriction while losing equal fat; and a time-restricted feeding study (Translational Medicine) showing TRF subjects preserved muscle mass despite lower testosterone and IGF, suggesting heightened anabolic sensitivity. He interprets these as evidence that the body adapts to brief restriction by improving its ability to retain protein when it is available again, a 'muscle sparing' effect that may be the result of protein sensitization and anabolic rebound.

Despite losing more body weight in the alternate day fasting group, which is no surprise, they had no muscle loss.

Also said
“Both groups lost the same amount of fat, but the group that did the independent sort of fluctuation of nutrients like low calorie and then higher calorie, low, they preserved more muscle.”— Highlights that fluctuating intake outperformed steady restriction for muscle preservation.
“the TRF group... actually had lower testosterone and lower IGF... they had a decrease... to a point where they actually had to increase the sensitivity to the testosterone and the IGF.”— Speculatory mechanism for anabolic sensitivity.

mTOR priming via infrequent bolus protein feeding

A study feeding 40g protein every 6 hours produced greater total muscle protein synthesis than smaller, more frequent doses, suggesting that larger gaps plus bolus feedings may prime the mTOR pathway.

Why this matters: Challenges the common advice to eat protein every 2-3 hours; supports the idea that longer gaps between protein feedings enhance the anabolic response.

Background

Traditional bodybuilding lore recommends frequent protein feedings to keep amino acids elevated. This study suggests the opposite.

DeLauer describes a Physiology journal study where participants after resistance training consumed 80g protein total, divided into three groups: 10g every 1.5 hours, 20g every 3 hours, or 40g every 6 hours. The bolus group (40g every 6h) showed the highest aggregate muscle protein synthesis markers (mTOR, p70S6K phosphorylation) over the study period. He argues that the longer gap between meals may have resensitized the muscle to the anabolic signal, and the bolus then triggered a stronger mTOR activation — a 'mTor priming' effect. This supports the idea that occasional protein restriction between larger feedings can maximize anabolism, rather than constant nibbling.

the bolus group consumed 40 grams of protein every six hours... there was more anabolic signaling, more mTor, more p7s 6K phosphorilation in the bolus group... the total aggregate there was more protein synthesis... when they would have protein in these larger bololises more infrequently.

Also said
“was it the large bolus or was it the gap between the meals? probably the gap between the meals and the bolis combined because if you were to say desensitize and have that consistently you might not get that rebound effect again”— Clarifies that the gap matters, not just the dose size.

autophagy and amino acid reutilization from protein restriction

Periodically lowering protein intake may boost autophagy and improve the recycling of amino acids within the body, contributing to muscle sparing and cellular cleanup.

Why this matters: Links protein reduction to autophagy benefits usually associated with fasting, potentially achieving some fasting benefits without total calorie restriction.

DeLauer explains that decreasing protein inhibits mTOR, which upregulates autophagy. This clears cellular debris, potentially makes cells operate more effectively, and promotes the reutilization of amino acids — broken down proteins from one area are redirected to more critical areas, sparing muscle. He notes that this approach aligns with concepts from Dr. Valter Longo's fasting-mimicking diet, which uses low protein and higher fat to stimulate autophagy while still providing energy. An mTOR rebound upon reintroducing protein could further boost anabolic signaling. This provides a rationale for occasional low-protein days as a 'protein fast' rather than a complete fast.

when you decrease protein you inhibit mTor or you drop mtor and autophagy increases. Now this could do a number of things. Number one you're going to clear cell debris. … you also condition the cells to be good at reusing material a little bit more.

Also said
“you also have what's called an mTor rebound where things just bounce back a little bit more when you do come out of autophagy and you get more potential muscle growth, more IGF, things like that.”— Adds the rebound angle to the autophagy benefit.
Disclosed sponsorships1speaker disclosed

Element Electrolytes

Supplement Sponsored · disclosed

He uses it to curb appetite during fasting or low-protein periods; contains 1000mg sodium, 200mg potassium, 60mg magnesium, no sugar.

DisclosureFree sample variety pack with any purchase via affiliate link drinklnt.com/thomas

DeLauer recommends Element Electrolytes as a beverage to sip during periods of caloric or protein restriction to help manage hunger. He states he has personally used it for 5-7 years to curb appetite, whether fasting or not. The product provides key electrolytes without sugar, which aligns with his low-calorie windows. He offers a free sample pack with purchase through his link, making it a direct affiliate promotion.

Personal experience

He says, 'it's my way of curbing my appetite for the last like five, six, even seven years, whether I'm fasting or not.'

there's no sugar, 1,000 milligrams of sodium, 200 milligrams potassium, and 60 milligrams of magnesium.

Also said
“it's not just about getting adequate minerals and electrolytes in. It truly is a way to curb your appetite.”— Highlights the dual benefit beyond hydration.
Find Element

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
When everyone in the fitness and health world goes left, I honestly try to go right.
Captures his contrarian approach to fitness trends that sets up the whole discussion.
if abstaining from carbohydrates occasionally makes us more insulin sensitive, would potentially abstaining from protein for short periods of time make us more protein sensitive?
The central, provocative question that frames the video's thesis.
by periodically restricting protein, we could be on to something. Just make sure that you're compensating for it during the full assist so you can actually get that rebound effect.
Concisely summarizes the protocol and its critical condition.
I'm eating two to 300 grams of protein a day, which means that maybe I'm getting very desensitized to that. So, I've occasionally said, 'Okay, I'm just going to drop my protein down to like 50 grams today and I'm not going to waste away and I'm going to do that to sort of cleanse the system a little bit.'
Personal anecdote illustrating the real-world implementation from a high-protein eater.
Despite losing more body weight in the alternate day fasting group, which is no surprise, they had no muscle loss.
Juxtaposes weight loss with muscle preservation, a surprising finding that supports his argument.
it would be maybe taking one or two days out of the week or out of the month or whatever, occasionally sensitizing yourself to protein.
Clear, actionable takeaway from the video.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

protein-sensitivityanabolic-reboundmuscle-sparingmTOR-primingautophagyintermittent-fastinglow-protein-dayselement-electrolytesalternate-day-fastingtime-restricted-feedingmuscle-protein-synthesisprotein-restrictionhormetic-stressvalter-longoglucose-toleranceappetite-control
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.