UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Dr. Paul Saladino’s New Strategy to Lose Fat Without Dieting or Tracking (it works)
~223 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Dr. Paul Saladino’s New Strategy to Lose Fat Without Dieting or Tracking (it works)

Thomas DeLauer
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Calorie counting fails 80+% of the time long-term; the model was co-opted by processed food companies like Coca-Cola to shift blame away from food quality. Paul Saladino argues that ‘calories in, calories out’ ignores the effect of food quality on satiety and metabolism.

2

The key to lasting fat loss is eating single-ingredient foods (the ‘great-grandmother rule’): meat, fruit, eggs, raw dairy, and honey. Avoid anything with ingredients your great-grandmother wouldn’t recognize—especially novel additives like EPG (asterified propoxilated glycerol) and artificial sweeteners like sucralose.

3

Honey and whole fruits, despite containing calories and sugar, do not spike endotoxin like refined sugar because their polyphenols modulate gut flora. Saladino uses raw glyphosate-free honey as a daily carbohydrate staple alongside fruit and squash.

4

Saladino’s personal protocol includes a morning smoothie with raw milk, honey, creatine monohydrate (10 g), bee pollen, royal jelly, desiccated organ supplements, acerola, and blueberries, followed by two meals of grass-fed beef with fruit and squash. He maintains a lean 166 lb on ~3,200+ cal/day without counting.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

6 items

Morning smoothie (the ‘everything’ shake)

WhatA blended shake containing raw milk, 10 g creatine monohydrate, glyphosate-free raw honey, bee pollen, royal jelly, raw meat (optional), desiccated testicle/organ supplements, acerola powder (vitamin C), and frozen organic blueberries.
WhenFirst meal of the day, in the morning.
Dose10 g creatine; unspecified amounts of other ingredients — Paul builds it intuitively.
For whomPaul Saladino himself; people who can tolerate raw milk and want a high-nutrient, nutrient-dense breakfast without cooking.
WhyDelivers a broad spectrum of micronutrients, peptides, and bioactive compounds (creatine for muscle/brain, bee products for hormones, organs for glandular support, vitamin C, and polyphenols) in a convenient, digestible form.
CaveatsRaw meat and raw milk carry pathogen risks; source high-quality ingredients, especially glyphosate-tested honey. Desiccated organs may not suit everyone.

Saladino describes this smoothie as the core of his morning routine. He throws in ‘glyphosate free honey, creatine monohydrate probably 10 grams, beet pollen, maybe a little bit of royal jelly, raw milk, maybe some raw meats, some hardened soil, desiccated organs, especially desiccated testicle … maybe some acerola for the vitamin C and then maybe some frozen organic blueberries.’ He notes he sometimes adds heart & soil organ blends. This is not a measured recipe; it’s a habit that evolves. He finds it simplifies his morning while packing in many of the supplements and whole foods he would otherwise take separately.

Mechanism

Bee pollen and royal jelly have been shown in some studies to support testosterone and hormone balance. Creatine monohydrate supports ATP regeneration, muscle, bone, and brain function. Organ supplements supply fat-soluble vitamins and unique peptides. The combination aims to cover micronutrient gaps in an animal-based diet while providing energy for the morning.

Personal experience

Saladino has been doing this smoothie consistently for an extended period and credits it with helping him maintain energy and body composition. Thomas DeLauer comments that bee pollen gives him ‘crazy energy that’s not related to calories.’

So, like I said, I start the morning with like the smoothie. And the smoothie is glyphosate free honey, creatine monohydrate, probably 10 grams in the smoothie to start, beet pollen, maybe a little bit of royal jelly, raw milk, maybe some raw meats, some hardened soil, desiccated organs, especially desiccated testicle.

Also said
“I just make a big smoothie in the morning. I kind of mess around with bee products like I like B pollen and royal jelly too.”— Highlights the flexible, non-prescriptive nature.

Animal-based lunch and dinner template

WhatGrass-fed beef (skirt steak, ribeye, or filet) with fruit and squash, repeated for both lunch and dinner.
WhenLunch and dinner daily.
DoseMacros: ~160 g protein, ~300 g carbohydrates, ≥100 g fat (yielding ~3,200-3,500 kcal). Protein equates to ~1 g/lb body weight (Paul weighs 166 lb).
For whomPaul Saladino himself; can be adapted for active individuals wanting to maintain or lose weight on an animal-based diet.
WhyProvides high-quality protein, bioavailable fats, and whole-food carbohydrates from fruit and squash, ensuring satiety and micronutrient density without calorie counting.
CaveatsGrass-fed beef can be expensive; squash may not be well tolerated by everyone; carbohydrate amount should be adjusted to activity level.

Saladino keeps his diet extremely simple: ‘I kind of repeat the same meal for lunch and dinner … grass-fed beef, usually skirt steak or ribeye or fillet with some fruit and some squash.’ He has recently added squash (kabocha) as a favored carbohydrate source. He doesn’t intentionally track macros daily but occasionally checks Cronometer; it typically hits 160 g protein, ~300 g carbs, and upwards of 100 g fat, totaling 3,200-3,500 kcal. Despite this high intake, he remains lean at 166 lb and doesn’t gain weight, which he uses as evidence that food quality governs energy expenditure more than calorie math.

Mechanism

The combination of ruminant meat for complete amino acids, heme iron, B12, and fat-soluble vitamins, plus fruit and squash for carbohydrates, electrolytes, and polyphenols, supports mitochondrial energy production without spiking endotoxin (as discussed for whole fruits). The high satiety prevents overeating, making intentional calorie restriction unnecessary.

Personal experience

Paul: ‘My body comp is great right now. So, I'm not really trying to restrict anything. I just kind of eat based on the way my body feels.’ Thomas shares that sweet potatoes cause him bloating and water retention, while honey does not.

I have grass-fed beef, usually skirt steak or ribeye or fillet with some fruit and some squash. … I'm not really trying to restrict anything. I just kind of eat based on the way my body feels.

Also said
“I probably have around 300 grams of carbohydrates a day … and I don't gain weight. … It's like, I guess I am because I'm not gaining weight.”— Shows the paradox of high intake without weight gain, underscoring the whole-food effect.

Creatine monohydrate — high dose with sleep-dose bump

WhatTake creatine monohydrate daily, 5-10 g, and increase to 20 g on days following poor sleep.
WhenDaily, in the morning smoothie or separately. Additional dose after poor sleep.
Dose5-10 g/day baseline; 20 g on sleep-deprived days. Paul uses 10 g in his smoothie.
For whomMen and women, especially those not eating large amounts of meat. Paul specifically highlights its importance for women and older adults for bone density.
WhySupports muscle strength, bone health (especially in postmenopausal women), and brain function; higher doses may cross the blood-brain barrier for cognitive benefits
CaveatsMonohydrate may cause water retention in some individuals (Thomas reports love-handle area); GI upset in a subset. For those, HCL form at 1-3 g may be an alternative, though human efficacy data is thinner.

Saladino notes that most men have heard of creatine from bodybuilding, but women virtually never have, yet it is hugely valuable for them, especially postmenopausal women at risk of osteopenia. He wants his 74-year-old mother to take at least 5-10 g. For himself, he uses 10 g daily and 20 g on days after poor sleep, claiming he notices mental performance benefits with very high doses. He acknowledges that monohydrate is the most studied form, but HCL may be tolerated by those who get GI issues or water retention. He and Thomas both agree that 10-15 g is where the ‘magic’ really kicks in for cognitive effects.

Mechanism

Creatine phosphate regenerates ATP, improving energy availability in muscle and neural tissue. At higher doses (20 g), it appears to exert nootropic effects, possibly by enhancing brain energy metabolism. Studies show 10 g dose aids bone mineral density.

Personal experience

Paul: ‘When I don't sleep well, I take 20.’ Thomas: ‘The magic kicked in for me north of 10 especially north of 15.’ Thomas mentions water retention in love-handle area from monohydrate, mitigated by HCL.

I take creatine monohydrate. Lineage makes a really good one. And I take 5 to 10 grams a day. Probably 10 grams a day. And then when I don't sleep well, I take 20.

Also said
“For women, it's such a valuable supplement. And the data is striking … 5 to 10 grams, the 10 gram dose is studied for bone health.”— Expands the use case beyond muscle to bone and female health.
“I don't anecdotally I don't notice any negative side effects from 20 grams of creatine a day and I think I do notice mental performance benefits.”— Addresses safety and subjective cognitive boost at high dose.

Eat single-ingredient foods — the great-grandmother rule

WhatBase your diet on foods that are single-ingredient (meat, fruit, eggs, milk, vegetables if tolerated) and avoid any packaged food with ingredients your great-grandmother wouldn’t recognize.
WhenEvery meal, every day.
DoseNo quantity limit; eat to satiety without counting calories.
For whomAnyone wanting to lose weight and improve health without tracking.
WhySingle-ingredient foods are inherently micronutrient-dense, satiating, and lack the hunger-disrupting additives found in ultra-processed products. This automatically regulates energy intake and metabolic health.
CaveatsSome whole foods may still not be tolerated (e.g., nightshades, high-oxalate greens) — people should experiment and observe their own response. Individual carbohydrate needs vary with activity.

Saladino calls this the ‘great-grandmother rule’: walk into a grocery store and stick to the perimeter where single-ingredient foods live. If a package has ingredients your great-grandmother wouldn't recognize, don't eat it. He stresses that processed food companies have spent decades using the calorie model to sell nutrient-depleted products that are marketed as ‘low calorie’ or ‘high protein’ but are actually harmful. By simplifying to whole foods, you sidestep all of that manipulation. He insists that ‘if you eat single ingredient foods exclusively or for the majority of your diet, you will become healthier. Full stop.’ This is his central weight-loss strategy, replacing all tracking with food quality.

Mechanism

Whole foods provide micronutrients necessary for mitochondrial function, and their physical structure and fiber slow digestion, promoting satiety. They lack artificial sweeteners and flavors that confuse brain appetite regulation, and avoid the endotoxin spikes caused by refined sugar. The absence of calorie-dilute, nutrient-poor ingredients prevents the ‘calorie prison’ binge cycle.

If you eat single ingredient foods exclusively or for the majority of your diet, you will become healthier. Full stop.

Also said
“It's single ingredient foods or foods with labels that your grandmother or your great-grandmother would recognize. I just call this the great-grandmother rule.”— Defines the rule in simple terms.
“The solution is food quality. … It's as simple as that. You almost don't even need to think about calories when you do that.”— Directly ties food quality to eliminating calorie counting.

Bee products stack (pollen, royal jelly, propolis)

WhatInclude raw bee pollen and royal jelly in the daily smoothie; propolis as available for immune benefits.
WhenDaily, in the morning smoothie.
DoseUnspecified; a teaspoon or so of pollen and a small amount of royal jelly.
For whomThose looking for natural hormone and immune support, especially if consuming lower-carb/excluding grains.
WhyBee pollen and royal jelly are linked to hormone support (testosterone), energy, and immune modulation. Royal jelly uniquely determines queen bee development, hinting at potent bioactive compounds.
CaveatsRoyal jelly can be hard to source; ensure it's raw and not heat-treated. Allergic reactions possible in bee-sensitive individuals. Glyphosate contamination in honey/bee products is a concern — source tested products.

Saladino has become fascinated by bee products. He describes the queen-making process: selected larvae are fed only royal jelly, while others get honey. The first queen to emerge kills the others — a dramatic biological differentiation driven entirely by this substance. He sources raw, cold-processed royal jelly from a bee farm. DeLauer chimes in that bee pollen gave him intense, calorie-independent energy during fasting phases. Both are concerned about glyphosate in commercial honey, hence Saladino’s own honey brand (Lineage) tested and sourced from glyphosate-free Yucatán apiaries. He foresees bee products becoming a core part of a nutrient-focused lifestyle.

Mechanism

Royal jelly contains unique proteins and fatty acids that, in bee biology, toggle the larvae between worker and queen. In humans, limited studies suggest effects on testosterone and nitric oxide. Bee pollen is rich in B vitamins, amino acids, and antioxidants, and DeLauer notes an almost immediate energy lift not explained by calories, potentially via enzymatic or cofactor activity.

Personal experience

Saladino: uses them in his smoothie. DeLauer: ‘B pollen’s no joke, man. … I could just take Bollin and I would like feel it just like my veins and get this crazy energy that was not no relationship to calories whatsoever.’

Royal jelly is really interesting. When bees make a hive … they feed those larvae only royal jelly. … The first queen to emerge goes and kills the other ones. So it's like Game of Thrones stuff here.

Also said
“Bee pollen and royal jelly both have effects on hormones I mean I think there's studies for both be pollen and royal jelly raising testosterone.”— Highlights the hormonal angle.

Desiccated organ supplements (testicle, heart & soil, immune blend)

WhatDesiccated bovine testicle for hormonal support; heart & soil organ blend for general micronutrients; and a histamine/immune blend combining thymus, lung, kidney.
WhenAdded to the morning smoothie daily.
DoseNot specified (likely per product label).
For whomPaul Saladino; potentially people with hormone dysregulation or histamine issues.
WhyProvides glandular nutrients that are hard to obtain elsewhere, including rare peptides and cofactors that support immune and endocrine function.
CaveatsQuality matters — source from grass-fed, pasture-raised animals. These are not replacements for a basic whole-food diet but enhancements.

Saladino mentions he specifically uses desiccated testicle and a heart & soil organ blend daily. He also takes a blend called ‘histamine and immune’ on occasion, which contains thymus, lung, and kidney, to help with any histamine sensitivity or allergies. He sees these as a way to get the benefits of nose-to-tail eating conveniently. He emphasizes that he’s not dogmatic — he simply finds they work for him.

Mechanism

Organ meats are the most nutrient-dense foods per gram, containing high levels of fat-soluble vitamins, CoQ10, and specific organ-derived peptides. Desiccated testicle theoretically provides androgenic precursors; the histamine/immune blend contains lung and kidney tissue that may modulate histamine pathways, supported by anecdotal reports of allergy improvement.

Personal experience

Paul: ‘I do the heart and soil organs. I do the desiccated testicle. … and I do the desiccated thymus with lung and kidney. It's uh called histamine and immune and that helps with allergies or any histamine sensitivity.’

I do the heart and soil organs. I do the desiccated testicle. And sometimes I do the desiccated thymus with lung and kidney. It's uh called histamine and immune and that helps with allergies or any histamine sensitivity.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

5 items

Calorie counting debunked — history of corporate capture

00:02:30 - 00:10:00 approx

Paul Saladino argues that the calorie model is a 19th-century heat measure co-opted by sugar-funded networks to sell processed foods; long-term weight-loss studies show calorie counting fails in 80+% of cases.

Why this matters: He directly ties the origins (Atwater, 1890) and recent Coca-Cola-funded ‘Global Energy Balance Network’ to the persistence of the ‘eat less, move more’ myth, naming it a deliberate scapegoat.

Background

Mainstream medicine still prescribes calorie restriction as first-line obesity advice, despite decades of poor long-term outcomes. Saladino frames the calorie model not as innocent science but as a marketing tool.

Saladino walks through the history: Wilbur Atwater’s bomb calorimeter in the 1890s measured heat, but humans run on electron transfer, not combustion. The US government used calories for rationing in WWI/II, and diet books cemented it in the 1950s-60s. Then in 2015, the New York Times exposed Coca-Cola’s secretly funded ‘Global Energy Balance Network’ which pushed calories-in/calories-out to give a pass to sugar-laden products. He emphasizes that even meta-analyses of 80+ RCTs show calorie counting fails for sustained weight loss—people may lose short-term but inevitably binge when nutrient-depleted. He calls the model a ‘calorie prison’ that the body breaks out of via survival instinct. He notes that many well-intentioned doctors still preach energy balance, but the quality of calories determines hunger and metabolic rate, making the equation useless in practice.

The literature simply does not support that strategy. And even in the last 30 to 20 years, 20 to 30 years, we've seen I mean, there's these crazy things. Do you know what the Global Energy Balance Network is? … Coca-Cola funded secretly the Global Energy Balance Network.

Also said
“I think counting calories based on the literature and based on the this kind of sketchy underbelly history of how they've been used to confuse us is the worst way to lose weight.”— Directly states his position on calorie counting.
“It works for processed food companies. It doesn't work for humans.”— Concisely captures the conflict of interest.

EPG (asterified propoxilated glycerol) — the new olestra in David bars

00:12:00 - 00:18:00 approx

Saladino highlights a novel fat replacer, EPG, approved in 2019, now used in David bars. He claims it depletes fat-soluble vitamins, causes GI issues akin to Olestra, and predicts it will spread across the food supply if a monopoly lawsuit fails.

Why this matters: EPG is an emerging food additive that few consumers know about. Saladino directly ties it to historical patterns of nutrient-depleting ‘diet’ products.

Background

Previous fat substitutes like Olestra caused anal leakage and vitamin depletion, leading to market withdrawal. EPG was rushed through GRAS status in 2019 and is now exclusively used by David Bar’s parent company after they bought the manufacturer and cut off competitors.

Saladino describes EPG as a modified fat derived from canola oil that passes through the GI tract unabsorbed, providing mouthfeel with fewer calories. He cites studies where EPG significantly reduced absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (beta-carotene, vitamin K1) and caused ‘spotting, gas with discharge’ at higher doses, mirroring Olestra’s infamous side effects. The marketing claims ‘most calories per gram of protein,’ which he calls nonsense. He notes the David bar manufacturer purchased Epigo, the sole producer, and blocked other brands, leading to a monopoly lawsuit. He fears that once the legal case resolves, EPG will appear in 20-30 products (nut butters, chocolates) and consumers will consume 10-30 g daily, thinking they’re dieting while depleting essential nutrients and suffering GI distress. He frames this as exactly the wrong approach to weight loss — prioritizing calorie math over nutrient density.

Personal experience

He mentions reading Amazon reviews where people describe leakage.

EPG has been described by one of their marketing people as the consistency of warm candle wax.

Also said
“It definitely decreases absorption of fats soluble vitamins. So beta-carotene, vitamin K1 in the study. So if it's doing K1, you know, it's doing K2 and D and E.”— Shows the mechanistic harm, not just GI discomfort.
“It is a negative. … You're going to eat it and if you don't get leakage or spotting, it's going to decrease your absorption of fats soluble vitamins.”— Emphasizes that the damage occurs even without obvious symptoms.

Sucralose increases hunger by altering hypothalamic blood flow

00:20:00 - 00:23:00 approx

A recent study shows sucralose increases blood flow to the satiety center (hypothalamus) and makes people hungrier compared to sugar, challenging the assumption that non-caloric sweeteners aid weight loss.

Why this matters: Counters the narrative that diet sodas are benign, and provides a concrete central mechanism (brain blood flow) for the observed clinical pattern of stubborn weight retention.

Background

Many weight-loss diets rely on artificial sweeteners to reduce calorie intake. Observational data and clinical anecdotes have long suggested they backfire, but mechanisms were unclear.

Saladino cites a study where sucralose vs sugar caused increased blood flow to the hypothalamus, interpreted as a disruption of satiety signaling. The participants reported greater hunger with sucralose. He ties this to the larger problem of going for ‘lower quality food that is potentially making you hungrier, sabotaging your satiety and you're just going to end up failing in the long term.’ He references physicians who routinely find that removing artificial sweeteners from patients’ diets breaks weight-loss plateaus — especially that ‘stubborn 5 to 10 pounds.’ His conclusion: these chemicals may help short-term but ultimately sabotage the brain’s appetite control, reinforcing the need for whole, unsweetened foods.

When humans consume sucralose versus sugar sucralose increases blood flow to the hypothalamus which is the satiety center and so the implication here … humans were hungrier with the sucralose versus processed sugar.

Also said
“I've seen multiple doctors, well-respected doctors, talk about the patients in their practices, and they say … when I remove them from my patients, many of my patients actually do better and they suddenly lose that stubborn 5 to 10 pounds.”— Links the lab finding to clinical outcomes.

Honey mitigates endotoxin rise unlike refined sugar

00:25:00 - 00:30:00 approx

Saladino presents evidence that natural sugars in honey and fruit do not trigger the same gut dysbiosis and endotoxin release as processed sugar, due to their polyphenolic compounds.

Why this matters: Resolves the apparent paradox of why calorie-dense honey seems health-promoting while sucrose is not, grounding it in gut physiology rather than calorie math.

Background

Nutrition orthodoxy often treats all sugars as equivalent ‘empty calories.’ Saladino has long advocated for honey and fruit, but here he provides a specific mechanistic bridge via lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and gram-negative bacteria.

He explains that when you feed pure sugar, it promotes overgrowth of gram-negative bacteria in the gut, releasing endotoxin (LPS) into the bloodstream. In contrast, apple juice or honey contain polyphenols that modulate the microbiome, preventing that LPS spike. He references animal studies where honey versus processed sugar mitigated the LPS rise. This, he argues, is why calories from honey behave differently in the body — they don't create the same inflammatory metabolic environment. He ties it back to the overarching theme: food quality matters more than calorie numbers, and natural carbohydrate sources with their co-evolved compounds are not equivalent to refined sugar.

Personal experience

Thomas DeLauer shares that he now uses honey deliberately to hit high-carb days without digestive distress, and that honey has become a staple because sweet potatoes cause him bloating.

Honey actually mitigated the rise in lipopolyaccharide that animals get when you feed them processed sugar. So I think it's something with the numerous polyphenolic and other plant compounds in the honey … that serve to just probably modify the way that gut flora populations change.

Also said
“If you give someone apple juice and that doesn't happen. And so this has actually been shown across multiple like sugar versus fruits.”— Broadens the principle beyond honey to whole fruit.

Anecdotal medicine and the limits of RCT worship

00:40:00 - 00:48:00 approx

Both speakers argue that large-scale anecdotal evidence (e.g., autoimmune remission on animal-based diets, European wheat tolerance) contains valid truths that current RCT frameworks may never capture, and that dismissing anecdotes is harming people.

Why this matters: A direct challenge to evidence hierarchies in nutrition science, coming from two content creators who themselves use RCTs extensively but see their limitations.

Background

The health online space often sees ‘anecdote’ used pejoratively. Saladino and DeLauer are both targets of such critique, yet they observe consistent patterns in thousands of followers.

Saladino recounts meeting a woman with lupus who achieved near-complete symptom remission within 45 days on a meat, fruit, raw milk diet after previously eating a Whole 30/paleo template. He notes that for her, removing vegetables and nuts made the difference, even though no RCT will confirm it. DeLauer adds the common story of people (including his wife) who can eat bread in Europe without reaction but suffer in the US. They discuss the intimidation effect of ‘watchdog’ critics who dismiss lived experience, and how this silences valuable conversation. Saladino emphasizes that while he’s not anti-RCT, the summed wisdom from consistent anecdote — people cutting processed foods, losing weight, reversing autoimmune conditions — should be shared as directional evidence, not buried.

Personal experience

Saladino: ‘Yesterday at lunch a woman with lupus told me her symptoms almost reversed after 45 days on animal-based diet.’ DeLauer: ‘My wife has severe autoimmune conditions and can eat fresh baked bread in France with zero GI issues.’

I don't think everyone needs to eat an animal-based diet and never eat a vegetable. But for her and for a lot of people I've met with intense autoimmune diseases, it helps.

Also said
“If I don't have an RCT to back it up, then does it magically not exist? Does am I completely invalidated because so everything that happened to me doesn't exist.”— Thomas DeLauer’s emotional framing of the problem.
Disclosed sponsorships5speaker disclosed

Thrive Market

Product Sponsored · disclosed

DeLauer promotes Thrive Market as a transparent online grocery that filters out junk ingredients, saving him time cross-referencing labels. He highlights their high-protein snacks and clean ingredient standards.

DisclosureThomas DeLauer’s sponsor for this episode; link below provides 30% off first order + $60 free gift.

Thomas DeLauer does a dedicated ad read for Thrive Market. He explains that even as someone who knows what to look for, grocery shopping takes him 25% longer because he cross-references all ingredients. Thrive Market takes the guesswork out by curating products without ‘weird kind of like pea protein’ or misleading labels. They deliver to your doorstep with fast shipping, making clean eating more convenient. He offers a link for 30% off first order plus a free $60 gift.

vs alternatives

Compared to typical grocery stores where ‘high protein’ snacks may only have 4g protein and hidden ingredients, Thrive Market offers transparent options you can trust without label-reading.

Personal experience

Thomas says: ‘Thrive Market takes that guesswork out of the equation for me and it makes it accessible to me, but it makes it accessible to people all over the country.’

The thing I like about Thrive is you see what you get and you get what you see. It's transparent.

Also said
“It takes me probably 25% longer to go grocery shopping than the average person because I do cross reference everything that's in the ingredients.”— Quantifies the time-saving value proposition.
Find Thrive

Lineage Glyphosate-Free Raw Organic Honey

Supplement Sponsored · disclosed

Saladino discusses that his honey is raw, organic, and tested free of glyphosate, sourced from the Yucatán after finding major US suppliers contaminated.

DisclosurePaul Saladino is the founder of Lineage. He created the brand to offer convenient, cleaner alternatives to processed foods.

When searching for a honey supplier, Saladino tested two major US honey manufacturers and both came back positive for glyphosate. He then began sourcing 100% from the Yucatán and tests every batch. He frames it as part of his mission to provide a convenient sweetener that doesn't disrupt gut flora like refined sugar and fits an animal-based diet. He recommends seeking glyphosate-tested honey generally. DeLauer endorses honey as a staple carbohydrate source.

vs alternatives

Most US honey is contaminated with glyphosate; European honeys and some international sources are cleaner. Lineage honey aims to fill that gap with verified testing.

Personal experience

Paul makes it part of his daily smoothie and carries it with him; he and Thomas were drinking it post-workout together.

We source 100% of our honey from the Yucatan … always tested for glyphosate. It's super interesting. Like so you have to almost go … to honeys outside of the US to find them really clean from that pesticide.

Also said
“We actually tested two of the major manufacturers in the US for glyphosate and they both came back dirty.”— Explains the necessity of his sourcing.
Find Lineage

Lineage Creatine Monohydrate

Supplement Sponsored · disclosed

Paul takes 5-10 g daily of his own brand’s creatine monohydrate, and 20 g after poor sleep. He designed it to be a clean, affordable monohydrate.

DisclosurePaul Saladino’s own brand; he mentions it when asked what creatine he takes.

Saladino mentions ‘Lineage makes a really good one’ in passing, praising the purity and efficacy of his product. He doesn’t heavily push it, but it’s the one he personally uses. The conversation then segues into the broader benefits of creatine.

vs alternatives

Other creatine HCL products are marketed as causing less water retention, but monohydrate is the most researched form. Saladino recommends monohydrate first, with HCL as a fallback for GI issues.

Personal experience

Paul uses it daily and notes no negative side effects even at 20 g.

Lineage makes a really good one. And I take 5 to 10 grams a day.

Find Lineage

Lineage Air-Dried Steak / Meat Snacks

Product Sponsored · disclosed

Saladino contrasts David bars with air-dried steak from Lineage, arguing that a nutrient-dense jerky offers similar convenience and better satiety without fake fats or sweeteners.

DisclosurePart of Paul Saladino’s Lineage brand, created as a convenient whole-food alternative to processed protein bars.

He argues that the demand for convenience leads people to fake health foods like David bars. He founded Lineage to offer options like air-dried steak that are single-ingredient, micronutrient-rich, and leave you less hungry. He notes that even a lean jerky or chicken breast has ‘just as good’ calorie-to-protein ratios as engineered bars, but without the gut-disrupting additives. He hopes more companies will create honest convenient foods.

vs alternatives

Compared to David Bar’s EPG, sucralose, and artificial flavors, Lineage steak is just meat, salt, and maybe spices—a single-ingredient food that fulfills the great-grandmother rule.

When you look at the calories per gram on like air dried steak from Lineage like or just a lean jerky or even a chicken breast, they're just as good as a David bar and it is a micronutrient-rich food that I am … going to leave you less hungry.

Find Lineage

Heart & Soil Organ Supplements (Desiccated Testicle, Histamine & Immune, etc.)

Supplement Sponsored · disclosed

Saladino includes these desiccated organ supplements in his smoothie. He uses the testicle blend and the histamine & immune blend (thymus, lung, kidney).

DisclosureHeart & Soil is a separate brand, presumably one Paul uses and possibly has ties to, but not explicitly stated as his own in this transcript. He heavily promotes organ supplements on his platforms; here he names Heart & Soil specifically.

Personal experience

Paul directly says he takes them daily in his smoothie.

I do the heart and soil organs. I do the desiccated testicle. And sometimes I do the desiccated thymus with lung and kidney. It's uh called histamine and immune.

Find Heart

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
I think counting calories based on the literature and based on the this kind of sketchy underbelly history of how they've been used to confuse us is the worst way to lose weight.
Packs his entire critique into one sentence — framing calorie counting as historically tainted.
It works for processed food companies. It doesn't work for humans.
A succinct, memorable dichotomy that captures the conflict of interest.
You can lose weight eating donuts. You can lose weight eating pizza. Absolutely you can. … But how are you going to feel? … at some point your body will break you out of that calorie prison and you will binge because you must.
Vivid image of calorie restriction as a prison that inevitably fails.
If you eat single ingredient foods exclusively or for the majority of your diet, you will become healthier. Full stop.
The most direct, simple rule from the entire episode; unambiguous and bold.
EPG has been described by one of their marketing people as the consistency of warm candle wax.
Disturbing and visceral description of a food additive, making the point unforgettable.
When humans consume sucralose versus sugar sucralose increases blood flow to the hypothalamus which is the satiety center and so the implication here … humans were hungrier with the sucralose.
Provides a concrete physiological mechanism for why ‘diet’ products may backfire — not just observational but now imaged.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

calorie-mythhistory-of-caloriescorporate-capture-food-industryglobal-energy-balance-networkfood-qualitygreat-grandmother-rulesingle-ingredient-foodsepg-asterified-propoxilated-glyceroldavid-bar-critiquefat-soluble-vitamin-depletionolestra-comparisonsucralose-hypothalamusartificial-sweeteners-hungerhoney-polyphenolsendotoxin-lpsglyphosate-contaminationbee-productsroyal-jelly-queen-beebee-pollen-energycreatine-monohydrate-dosing
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.