UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
You’ve Been Using the Wrong Sweetener — Fat Cell Scientist Explains Why
~39 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

You’ve Been Using the Wrong Sweetener — Fat Cell Scientist Explains Why

Thomas DeLauer
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Thomas DeLauer ranks allulose as the best sweetener, followed by stevia and monk fruit, then erythritol, aspartame, and warns against maltitol (GI distress) and sucralose (potential blood-brain barrier crossing).

2

He personally uses and recommends Seeds Daily Synbiotic probiotic for its capsule-in-capsule delivery and transparent clinical trials.

3

He dismisses aspartame cancer fears as based on unrealistic rodent studies (equivalent to 28 cans of soda/day) and notes it simply breaks down into amino acids.

4

He advocates consuming soluble fibers (like fructooligosaccharides) to naturally stimulate GLP-1, leveraging his PhD lab's research on GLP-1 drugs.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

3 items

Sweetener Selection Hierarchy

WhatChoose allulose as primary sweetener; stevia and monk fruit are acceptable; erythritol is the best sugar alcohol; avoid maltitol; prefer aspartame over sucralose in diet sodas.
WhenWhenever using non-caloric sweeteners
For whomAnyone using non-caloric sweeteners
WhyBased on metabolic effects, GI tolerance, and safety evidence; allulose and erythritol are largely excreted, stevia/monk fruit are benign, aspartame is safe, maltitol causes severe GI distress, sucralose has speculative blood-brain barrier concerns.
CaveatsSucralose caution is based on speculative evidence; aspartame is safe for most but those with phenylketonuria must avoid it. Maltitol avoidance is due to GI side effects, not metabolic harm.

DeLauer walks through each sweetener's metabolic fate and practical downsides. Allulose and erythritol are primarily urinated out, causing no insulin response. Stevia and monk fruit are natural and benign. Aspartame breaks down into amino acids. Maltitol creates an osmotic gradient in the gut, pulling water and causing diarrhea. Sucralose may cross the blood-brain barrier. He personally follows this hierarchy, choosing Diet Dr. Pepper (aspartame) over zero-sugar versions (sucralose).

Personal experience

He shares that he avoids maltitol after witnessing a family member's distress, and he always picks aspartame-sweetened soda over sucralose-sweetened ones.

if I'm going to indulge in a diet soda, I'm going to personally pick the one that doesn't have the sucralose in it.

Also said
“I have no um I'm no problem putting alulose first.”— His top recommendation.
“most monk fruit extract and even some stevia is actually mixed with arythril which I give of all the sugar alcohols I consider arythrtol the best.”— Notes that common blends are acceptable because erythritol is the best sugar alcohol.

Diet Soda: Aspartame over Sucralose

WhatWhen choosing a diet soda, select one sweetened with aspartame rather than sucralose (e.g., Diet Dr. Pepper instead of Dr. Pepper Zero).
WhenWhen indulging in diet soda
For whomDiet soda drinkers
WhyAspartame is metabolized into harmless amino acids; sucralose has speculative evidence of crossing the blood-brain barrier, and he finds it too sweet.
CaveatsSucralose concerns are not confirmed in humans; personal taste preference also plays a role.

DeLauer explains that aspartame simply breaks down into amino acids and is safe for the vast majority, while sucralose has some evidence of crossing the blood-brain barrier, giving him pause. He personally finds sucralose too sweet and prefers the taste of aspartame-sweetened Diet Dr. Pepper. He notes that 'zero' branded sodas typically use sucralose, while 'diet' versions use aspartame.

Personal experience

He says, 'my preferred diet soda indulgence, I like the diet. I don't like the zero' and 'if I'm going to indulge in a diet soda, I'm going to personally pick the one that doesn't have the sucralose in it.'

if I'm going to indulge in a diet soda, I'm going to personally pick the one that doesn't have the sucralose in it.

Also said
“I don't like the zero the zero kind of brand because that usually has sucralose in it and that's just a little too sweet.”— His taste preference aligns with his safety caution.

Daily Probiotic with Capsule-in-Capsule Delivery

WhatTake Seeds Daily Synbiotic (or a probiotic with multi-stage delivery) daily to support gut health.
WhenDaily (timing not specified)
DoseOne serving daily (as per product)
For whomAnyone seeking a reliable probiotic
WhyMost probiotics are destroyed in the gut; Seed's capsule-in-capsule technology ensures survival. They publish their own clinical trials, even unfavorable ones, demonstrating transparency.
CaveatsHe is affiliated with the brand (discount link). Not all probiotics are equal; look for ones with proven delivery systems.

DeLauer praises Seed for their honesty in publishing trials even when results aren't favorable, and their customer service. He says it's the only probiotic he uses. He contrasts it with the common 'supplement company sham' perception, arguing that probiotics are among the most vetted supplements but most fail due to gut destruction. Seed's technology and clinical transparency set it apart.

Mechanism

The capsule-in-capsule design protects bacteria from stomach acid, allowing delivery to the intestines where they can colonize.

Personal experience

He states, 'I'm a huge fan. It's the only probiotic that I personally use.'

it's the only probiotic that has this multi-stage delivery system where it has a capsule inside of a capsule.

Also said
“they publish their own clinical trials and sometimes it doesn't work in their favor, but they publish it anyway because they are honest”— Highlights the transparency that earns his trust.
“the problem is most are destroyed in the gut. So, that's what I like about Seed is they put their money where their mouth is with their technology”— Explains the core problem Seed solves.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

4 items

Sweetener ranking: allulose best, maltitol worst

Thomas DeLauer provides a personal hierarchy of sweeteners, placing allulose first, then stevia/monk fruit, erythritol as best sugar alcohol, aspartame as safe, and maltitol last due to severe GI distress despite metabolic inertness.

Why this matters: He offers a nuanced, evidence-informed ranking that challenges common fears about aspartame and highlights practical social downsides of maltitol.

Background

Many people are confused about which sweeteners are healthiest, with widespread fear of aspartame and sucralose, and sugar alcohols often lumped together.

DeLauer begins by listing the major sweeteners: sucralose, aspartame, and the sugar alcohols xylitol, maltitol, erythritol. He immediately notes they are not equal. He explains that erythritol is mostly urinated out, while maltitol (or mannitol) can actually be absorbed and trigger an insulin response, and xylitol is substantially better. Maltitol, however, often doesn't leave the gut; it stays in the intestines, creates an osmotic gradient, and pulls in water, leading to the infamous 'sugar-free gummy bear' explosive diarrhea. He shares a personal story of a family member who ate Hershey's sugar-free chocolate with maltitol before a dinner cruise and suffered stomach distress. He concludes that while maltitol is metabolically inert, the social cost is too high. He then ranks allulose first, stevia and monk fruit as 'perfectly benign,' erythritol as the best sugar alcohol, aspartame as no problem (metabolized to amino acids), and sucralose with caution due to speculative blood-brain barrier evidence. He personally avoids sucralose in diet sodas, preferring aspartame-sweetened Diet Dr. Pepper.

Personal experience

He recounts the Hawaii story: a family member who lost 70 lbs on low-carb excitedly showed him Hershey's sugar-free chocolate made with maltitol. DeLauer declined to eat it, and later the family member experienced stomach issues on a dinner cruise. He also shares his own preference for Diet Dr. Pepper (aspartame) over zero-sugar versions (sucralose).

So on that ranking, I have no um I'm no problem putting alulose first. And then I actually am very comfortable. Stevia um and monk fruit extract I generally give very good scores to as those natural sweeteners.

Also said
“you can't go out with friends and be in polite society if you've consumed that because you don't know what's going to happen.”— Highlights the social cost of maltitol despite its metabolic inertness.
“aspartame is I don't think it has earned or or or has is worthy of the um bad press that it's received from most people.”— His contrarian stance on aspartame safety.
“sucralose I actually have more of a problem with sucralose because of the little bit of evidence showing its ability to cross the bloodb brain barrier.”— His specific concern about sucralose, which influences his personal choices.

Aspartame is safe and unfairly demonized

DeLauer argues that aspartame does not deserve its bad reputation; cancer fears stem from rodent studies using unrealistic doses, and it simply metabolizes into harmless amino acids.

Why this matters: He directly challenges the widespread public fear of aspartame with a dose-context argument and a simple metabolic explanation.

Background

Aspartame has been linked to cancer in some studies, leading to consumer avoidance and 'diet soda' stigma.

DeLauer addresses the fear head-on: the studies showing aspartame causes cancer used a rodent model genetically inclined to develop cancer and gave them the equivalent of 28 cans of caffeinated soda a day. He counters that if you gave an animal that much sugar, they would not only get cancer but also become obese and diabetic. He states aspartame is 'among the most simple' because it gets metabolized into amino acids—phenylalanine and aspartic acid—and as long as a person doesn't have the rare phenylalanine enzymatic deficiency (phenylketonuria), there is no problem. The vast majority of people do not have this deficiency. Thus, he considers aspartame safe and unworthy of the bad press.

Personal experience

He personally drinks diet soda with aspartame (Diet Dr. Pepper) and has no problem with it.

aspartame is I don't think it has earned or or or has is worthy of the um bad press that it's received from most people.

Also said
“my counter always is, well, what would have happened if you'd given the animal that much sugar?”— His key rebuttal to the aspartame-cancer studies.
“the equivalent of, you know, 28 cans of of caffeinated soda a day.”— Quantifies the unrealistic dose used in rodent studies.
“it just gets metabolized into some amino acids that if a person doesn't have a deficiency in the phen phenyl alanine enzyatic pathway and the vast majority of people do not there's no problem”— Explains the simple metabolic fate of aspartame.

Sucralose warrants caution due to blood-brain barrier evidence

DeLauer is more cautious about sucralose than aspartame because of speculative evidence that it can cross the blood-brain barrier, though he acknowledges no human confirmation.

Why this matters: He distinguishes between two artificial sweeteners often lumped together, giving a specific mechanistic concern for one.

Background

Sucralose is widely used in 'zero-sugar' products and generally considered safe, but some research has raised questions about its effects on the brain.

DeLauer notes that while the research is speculative and lacks real evidence in humans, the little bit of evidence showing sucralose's ability to cross the blood-brain barrier is enough to give him pause. He doesn't claim it's dangerous, but it's the one sweetener he looks at with 'a little more caution.' This concern, combined with his personal taste preference (he finds sucralose too sweet), leads him to avoid it in diet sodas. He specifically chooses Diet Dr. Pepper (aspartame-sweetened) over Dr. Pepper Zero (sucralose-sweetened).

Personal experience

He says, 'if I'm going to indulge in a diet soda, I'm going to personally pick the one that doesn't have the sucralose in it.' He finds sucralose 'a little too sweet' and prefers the taste of aspartame-sweetened soda.

sucralose I actually have more of a problem with sucralose because of the little bit of evidence showing its ability to cross the bloodb brain barrier.

Also said
“that's a lot of speculative research, no real evidence in humans to confirm any concerns. Um, but it is one that gives me a little pause.”— Acknowledges the uncertainty while explaining his caution.
“I don't like the zero the zero kind of brand because that usually has sucralose in it and that's just a little too sweet.”— His personal taste preference reinforces his avoidance.

Maltitol: metabolically inert but socially disastrous

DeLauer explains that maltitol passes through the body unmetabolized but causes an osmotic gradient in the gut, leading to severe, unpredictable diarrhea that makes it socially unacceptable.

Why this matters: He highlights a practical, real-world downside of a sweetener that is often marketed as 'sugar-free' and 'low-calorie,' using a vivid personal anecdote.

Background

Sugar alcohols like maltitol are used in many sugar-free candies and chocolates because they provide sweetness with fewer calories, but they are known to cause digestive issues.

DeLauer describes the mechanism: maltitol doesn't leave the gut; it stays in the intestines and creates an osmotic gradient, pulling in water. This leads to the infamous 'explosive' diarrhea documented in Amazon reviews of sugar-free gummy bears. He shares a story of a family member who, after losing 70 pounds on a low-carb diet, was excited to find Hershey's sugar-free chocolate made with maltitol. DeLauer read the label and declined. The family member ate a few before a dinner cruise and soon experienced stomach distress, anticipating 'Pompeii about to erupt.' DeLauer concludes that even though maltitol is metabolically inert, the social cost—'you can't go out with friends and be in polite society'—makes it rank very low.

Personal experience

He recounts the Hawaii dinner cruise story with his family member and the Hershey's sugar-free chocolate, and his own decision to pass on the chocolate.

you can't go out with friends and be in polite society if you've consumed that because you don't know what's going to happen.

Also said
“it stays in the intestines and it creates what's called called an osmotic gradient and starts pulling in a lot of water.”— Explains the biological mechanism behind the GI distress.
“if you've ever uh you know, gone all the way with Maltitol to the point where you've experienced the exit, um Oh, no. It's explosive. It's It's horrible.”— Emphasizes the severity of the effect.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

3 items

Diet Dr. Pepper (aspartame-sweetened)

Product

His preferred diet soda indulgence, chosen for its aspartame sweetener and taste.

DeLauer explains that he avoids zero-sugar versions because they contain sucralose, which he finds too sweet and has speculative blood-brain barrier concerns. He prefers the original diet version sweetened with aspartame. He states this is his go-to when he indulges in a diet soda.

vs alternatives

Zero-sugar versions typically use sucralose, which he avoids due to speculative blood-brain barrier evidence and excessive sweetness.

Personal experience

my preferred diet soda indulgence, I like the diet. I don't like the zero

if I'm going to have a diet Dr. Pepper, which is my preferred diet soda indulgence, I like the diet. I don't like the zero

Find Diet

Allulose sweetener

Product

He ranks allulose as the best sweetener overall, implying it's a top choice for those seeking a non-caloric sweetener.

DeLauer places allulose first in his ranking, noting it is largely excreted in urine and has no apparent metabolic downsides. He doesn't mention a specific brand, but endorses it as the superior option among all sweeteners discussed.

vs alternatives

Compared to other sweeteners, allulose is his top pick, above stevia, monk fruit, and sugar alcohols.

I have no um I'm no problem putting alulose first.

Find Allulose

Monk fruit extract and stevia (often blended with erythritol)

Product

He gives these natural sweeteners 'very good scores' and considers them benign, noting they are frequently mixed with erythritol, which he deems the best sugar alcohol.

DeLauer says stevia and monk fruit extract are 'perfectly benign and thus acceptable.' He points out that most commercial products blend them with erythritol, which he approves of because erythritol is largely urinated out and causes no insulin response. This makes the common blends a good choice.

vs alternatives

Compared to artificial sweeteners like sucralose or aspartame, these natural options are his preferred choices after allulose.

Stevia um and monk fruit extract I generally give very good scores to as those natural sweeteners.

Also said
“most monk fruit extract and even some stevia is actually mixed with arythril which I give of all the sugar alcohols I consider arythrtol the best.”— Explains why common blends are still acceptable.
Find Monk
Disclosed sponsorships1speaker disclosed

Seeds Daily Synbiotic

Supplement Sponsored · disclosed

He recommends it as the only probiotic he uses, citing its capsule-in-capsule delivery and transparent clinical trials.

DisclosureProvides a 25% off discount link below the video, indicating an affiliate relationship.

DeLauer explains that most probiotics are destroyed in the stomach, but Seed's capsule-in-capsule technology protects the bacteria. He also values that the company publishes its own clinical research, even when results are not favorable, which he sees as a mark of honesty. He contrasts this with the typical 'supplement company sham' perception. He personally uses it and is a 'huge fan.'

vs alternatives

Unlike many probiotics that don't survive the gut, Seed's delivery system ensures viability. They also publish their own research, unlike most supplement companies.

Personal experience

I'm a huge fan. It's the only probiotic that I personally use.

it's the only probiotic that has this multi-stage delivery system where it has a capsule inside of a capsule.

Also said
“they publish their own clinical trials and sometimes it doesn't work in their favor, but they publish it anyway because they are honest”— Demonstrates the transparency that sets them apart.
Find Seeds

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

4 items
aspartame is I don't think it has earned or or or has is worthy of the um bad press that it's received from most people.
Contrarian defense of aspartame against popular fear.
my counter always is, well, what would have happened if you'd given the animal that much sugar?
Highlights the flawed comparison in aspartame cancer studies.
you can't go out with friends and be in polite society if you've consumed that because you don't know what's going to happen.
Vividly captures the social risk of maltitol.
if I'm going to indulge in a diet soda, I'm going to personally pick the one that doesn't have the sucralose in it.
Clear personal rule based on his risk assessment.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

sweetener-rankingallulosesteviamonk-fruiterythritolxylitolmaltitolaspartame-safetysucralose-blood-brain-barriersugar-alcohols-osmotic-effectglp-1soluble-fiberprobioticsseeds-daily-symbioticdiet-soda
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.