UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
How do Polish special services work? WSI officer "Kafir"
~55 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

How do Polish special services work? WSI officer "Kafir"

Cyprian Majcher
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Former WSI officer Cyprian Majcher reveals that real intelligence work is 90% boring paperwork, not Hollywood action, and that the 2006 reform of Polish military services (replacing WSI with SKW) destroyed a professional service, replacing it with one where 70% of personnel never served in the military.

2

He warns that Poland faces a real threat of war due to the loss of the US as a reliable ally under Trump, and urges civilians to prepare by fixing teeth, stockpiling medications for 6 months, having 2-3 months of non-perishable food, knowing water sources, and learning first aid and shooting.

3

He states that Polish services did not use honey traps or trained prostitutes (unlike Russia), and that recruitment of agents is a long psychological process, not coercion; he refuses to disclose operational details.

4

He recommends the film 'Akwarium' as the most realistic depiction of intelligence work, and his own books 'Cywil na wojnie' and 'Alfabet wojny' for civilian survival guidance.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

7 items

fix-teeth-before-war

WhatGet all dental work done now, because during war you won't have access to dentists.
WhenBefore any real threat materializes.
For whomAll civilians in potential conflict zones.
WhyDental pain can become a major problem when healthcare collapses; specialists will be scarce.

Majcher says this is the number one basic thing. He explains that people postpone dental visits, but in war, a toothache can become your biggest problem because there will be nowhere to go. He ties this to the broader advice to take care of your health while specialists are still available.

One basic thing before a real threat is you should get your teeth fixed. ... when the war starts and your teeth start hurting, believe me, it will be your biggest problem. You won't have anywhere to go.

Also said
“Take care of your health. This is the first thing you should do before a real conflict, while those specialists are still available.”— Broadens the advice to general health.

stockpile-medications-for-6-months

WhatIf you have a chronic illness, secure at least a 6-month supply of your medications and continually replenish it.
WhenNow, before any crisis.
DoseAt least 6 months' worth.
For whomPeople with long-term illnesses.
WhySupply chains may fail, and doctors may not be available to write prescriptions.

He warns that people think they can just go to the doctor next month, but in a crisis, there will be no one to prescribe. He says to keep a rotating stockpile.

If you are a person with an illness, you have a long-term illness, secure at least a six-month supply of medications and constantly replenish this stock, because when something starts, you won't have anywhere to buy these medications.

store-non-perishable-food-for-2-3-months

WhatKeep a supply of non-perishable food for 2-3 months at home.
WhenNow.
Dose2-3 months' worth.
For whomAll civilians.
WhySupply chains can be disrupted, and a city might not be resupplied for a week or more; having food ensures survival during gaps.

He clarifies it's not that shops will close forever, but there may be periods where deliveries fail. He says to have enough to get through a week or two without resupply.

Such basic food products that don't spoil for two, three months ahead, to have at home, because ... there may be moments when the supply chain fails and, for example, a city won't be supplied for two weeks.

know-water-sources-and-shelter-locations

WhatIdentify the nearest well or water source, the nearest hospital, and the nearest shelter (use the app). Know how to reach them without a phone.
WhenNow, as part of preparedness.
For whomAll civilians, especially in cities.
WhyIf water stops flowing from taps or power goes out, you need alternatives. Knowing locations without GPS is crucial.

He says people should learn the topography of their city: where to get drinking water (e.g., a well), where the nearest hospital is, and where shelters are. There is an app for shelters. He stresses being able to find these places without a phone, as power may be out.

It's worth it as a civilian, where you live ... you don't know where you can get water, and in case you run out of tap water, where is the nearest water intake point, some well, right? ... where is the nearest hospital, where is the nearest well to get drinking water. ... there is an app for that. People should figure these things out and be able to get to them without a phone.

prepare-evacuation-backpack-with-documents

WhatHave a backpack with your most important documents ready to grab if you need to flee a burning building.
WhenAlways ready.
For whomAll civilians.
WhyIn an emergency like a fire or bombing, you don't want to leave with nothing; having documents ensures you can prove identity and access services.
CaveatsIt doesn't need to contain everything, just the essentials you'd want to save.

He says it's not a full survival backpack, but a grab-bag with personal documents. He emphasizes that in a panic, you might otherwise leave empty-handed.

It's worth having that pseudo-evacuation backpack, but a backpack in which, in case of emergency, you will have your most important documents, which you would want to grab if, say, the block starts burning, so you don't leave home with nothing.

learn-first-aid-and-shooting

WhatTake a first aid course and learn to shoot, but be cautious about owning a gun.
WhenBefore any conflict.
For whomAll civilians, especially those who might be conscripted.
WhyFirst aid is even more important than shooting. Shooting skills are useful if you get conscripted, but carrying a gun as a civilian can make you a target.
CaveatsOwning a gun can be dangerous: you may be stopped by your own patrols or shot by enemy forces. There are no lone commandos. He does not recommend walking in the woods with a gun.

He says it's worth investing in first aid training above all. For shooting, it's good to have the skill so that if you're called up, you already know how. But he warns that Russians have lists of gun owners and may target them. He says a gun can harm you more than help. He explicitly says he doesn't believe in lone wolf survivalists.

It's worth going and learning to shoot, but owning a gun is your individual assessment, because a gun can harm you in some moments. ... There are no lone commandos. I don't believe in such.

Also said
“On proscription lists, the Russians have such lists. ... there were also shooters possessing firearms. Yes, so you know, right, that it might even harm you, not help.”— Warns that gun ownership can put you on enemy kill lists.
“Certainly, above all, provide first aid, because that is even more important than shooting.”— Prioritizes first aid over combat skills.

avoid-spy-media-to-prevent-contamination

WhatDo not watch spy movies or read spy novels while writing in the genre, to avoid unconsciously copying ideas.
WhenDuring the writing process.
For whomWriters of spy fiction, per Majcher's personal practice.
WhyTo maintain originality and avoid accidentally incorporating fictional elements into your own work.

Majcher says he only reads documents and non-fiction, and avoids films and novels so that he doesn't fixate on something and later think it's his own idea. He does this to keep his books authentic.

Personal experience

He personally follows this rule: 'I don't watch action films, so as not to inadvertently pull something into my books.'

I don't watch action films, so as not to inadvertently pull something into my books. Not because I don't like them, but simply as long as I'm writing books of such a nature, I don't want to fixate on something.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

6 items

intelligence-work-is-boring-paperwork

Real intelligence work is 80-90% boring document analysis and bureaucracy, not Hollywood-style action.

Why this matters: Contradicts popular media portrayals and reveals the mundane reality of spy agencies.

Background

Movies and series depict spies in car chases and shootouts, but Majcher says that's mostly fiction.

Majcher explains that before any field operation, officers spend enormous time on documents. He says dynamic actions are rare, and the work is more like office work. He contrasts this with the film 'Akwarium', which he says accurately shows the need for paperwork and authorization for every action. He also notes that officers are not 'agents' but rather handlers who recruit and run agents, like a director with actors. He personally avoids watching spy movies or reading spy novels to prevent unconsciously copying ideas into his own books.

Personal experience

He says he doesn't watch spy movies or read spy novels while writing his books, to avoid contamination.

Contrary to appearances, it's boring and monotonous work. You really do a lot of work on documents before you even go into the field.

Also said
“I think 80% is fiction, maybe even 90, and 10% is reality.”— Quantifies the gap between fiction and reality.
“I don't watch action films, so as not to inadvertently pull something into my books.”— Shows his personal discipline to maintain authenticity.

2006-reform-devastated-military-intelligence

The 2006 dissolution of WSI and creation of SKW destroyed a professional military service, replacing it with a civilian-dominated agency that lacks army expertise.

Why this matters: A former insider's blunt assessment that the reform was a disaster, and that the current service is not fit for purpose.

Background

After 2006, the Polish government under PiS dissolved the Wojskowe Służby Informacyjne (WSI) and created the Służba Kontrwywiadu Wojskowego (SKW) and Służba Wywiadu Wojskowego (SWW). Many documents were declassified, and the old service was publicly discredited.

Majcher states that WSI was a true military service, with 99% of its officers coming from the army and specialized in air force, navy, or land forces. In contrast, SKW is only 'military' in name, with about 70% of its personnel never having served in the military. He says this lack of military background means they don't understand the army. He also claims that before 2006, no officer would have dreamed of speaking publicly, but the declassification and destruction of the service led people like him to come forward. He mentions that under Minister Macierewicz, counterintelligence training courses were as short as two weeks, which he considers useless. He says the current service is 'not good' because it's not composed of people who know the army, comparing it to a cosmonaut working as a lifeguard at a pool.

Personal experience

He served in both WSI and SKW, so he witnessed the transition. He says he probably wouldn't have spoken out if not for what was done in 2006.

Too much started being said after 2006. Before 2006, no one would have even thought about it, at least in the military services. I probably wouldn't have gone anywhere either, if it weren't for what was done, right? Where certain things were declassified that shouldn't have been declassified, where a service was destroyed and devastated that shouldn't have been devastated.

Also said
“SKW is a service only military in name, because about 70% consists of officers who have never been in the military in their lives.”— Quantifies the civilianization of the service.
“It's like a cosmonaut became a lifeguard. At a pool.”— Vivid analogy for the mismatch of expertise.
“Under Macierewicz, there were two-week [courses]. What can you learn in the intelligence service in two weeks? As much as in the army in two days.”— Highlights the absurdly short training under the reform.

loss-of-us-ally-makes-war-real-threat

The US under Trump is no longer a reliable ally, giving Russia a green light and making a real war threat for Poland.

Why this matters: A former intelligence officer's stark warning based on geopolitical shifts, contradicting earlier complacency.

Background

Majcher says that just half a year ago he thought war would never come, but the most important ally (the US) has crumbled. He points to Trump's treatment of Ukraine and the uncertain relationship with Putin.

He explains that the situation is now uncertain because Poland lost its biggest ally. He says Trump has effectively abandoned Ukraine and given Russia a free hand. He believes Poland should prepare for a real threat, and that within a year or even sooner we will know more. He ties this directly to civilian preparedness advice, emphasizing that the threat is no longer theoretical. He notes that the US's reliability is in question, and privately, Polish leaders might not be sure of support.

Personal experience

He says he changed his mind in the last half year: 'Just half a year ago I thought war would never come here.'

Listen, just half a year ago I thought war would never come here, but our ally has crumbled, and the most important one at that.

Also said
“For now, Russia got a nice green card from Trump, that it can basically do everything and not suffer consequences for it.”— Explicitly blames Trump for enabling Russia.
“I believe we should prepare for a real threat and everything depends on which direction the war in Ukraine goes.”— Links the threat to Ukraine war outcome.

polish-services-did-not-use-honey-traps

Polish intelligence did not train prostitutes or use sexual entrapment; that was a Russian practice.

Why this matters: Clarifies a common misconception and distinguishes Polish methods from Russian ones.

Background

In his novels, Majcher wrote about Russian services training women to be better in bed to extract information. The host asked if Polish services did the same.

Majcher firmly states that Polish services never did such things. He says in Russia there were schools for this, and some defectors have spoken about it. He says in democratic countries, such methods were not used. However, when pressed if there were situations where only a woman could extract information, he refuses to answer, implying it might have happened but he won't discuss it. He also notes that men can also use seduction, but again won't elaborate.

We didn't do that. At least in Polish services, there were no such persons, women, who were trained to extract information through bed? No, no, no. We didn't do that.

Also said
“In Russian ones, there were schools for this, they did it there. They taught, taught how to get a man and use him.”— Confirms Russian use of such methods.
“But in our democratic countries, such methods were not used.”— Frames it as a democratic vs. authoritarian divide.

judges-and-prosecutors-never-held-accountable

After the fall of communism, only low-level security officers were punished; judges and prosecutors who enabled the system were never held accountable, and one even sits on the constitutional tribunal.

Why this matters: A sharp critique of Poland's transitional justice, from a former insider.

Background

The host asked if the system has tools to deal with rogue agents. Majcher said yes, but then pivoted to the lack of accountability for the judiciary.

Majcher argues that the system always has tools, but they are not used against the powerful. He points to the post-1989 reckoning: only SB officers were convicted, while the judges and prosecutors who issued the sentences were untouched. He says to this day, none have been held accountable, and one of them is now a judge on the constitutional tribunal. He implies a deep rot in the system where the legal enablers of repression escape justice.

No one has held prosecutors or judges accountable to this day, and no one even thought about it. One of them sits on the tribunal.

Also said
“They held the dogs accountable. Such ones for bringing information bones.”— Dismisses the punished officers as mere pawns.

agent-recruitment-is-long-psychological-process

Recruiting an agent is a complex psychological game that can take months to years, and each officer has their own method; voluntary cooperation yields better results than coercion.

Why this matters: Demystifies the recruitment process and emphasizes psychology over blackmail.

Background

Movies often depict quick, coercive recruitment. Majcher says it's far more nuanced.

Majcher explains that recruitment is entirely psychological from start to finish. It's a difficult, complex process that can take half a year in counterintelligence and up to five years in foreign intelligence. He says each officer develops their own approach, and it's not a step-by-step recipe. He stresses that voluntary recruitment is more successful than dependency-based (coercive) methods, which he associates more with intelligence than counterintelligence. He refuses to share specific techniques, saying 'let them suffer' (meaning let others figure it out). He also won't discuss his own agents to avoid compromising them.

Personal experience

He says he won't talk about his own agent network because his career path can be traced, and revealing where his agents worked would allow the service to identify them.

It's all a psychological game. From start to finish, it's psychology. ... it's a difficult, complex process, because you aim to recruit someone for cooperation and it's not easy and doesn't last a month or two. Sometimes it takes half a year.

Also said
“On a voluntary basis, we had rather greater successes than on a dependency basis.”— Highlights the superiority of voluntary recruitment.
“Each officer did it in their own specific way. Recruiting someone for cooperation is really not an easy matter and you can't just tell it like, I did this, this, and this, and then this, this, and this and it worked out, no, it's not building with Lego blocks.”— Emphasizes the non-formulaic, individualized nature.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

2 items

Akwarium

Product

Majcher says this Polish film (based on a Russian book) is the closest to reality in showing that every action requires documentation and authorization, and that there are no impulsive actions.

He says it's a Polish film about a Russian book, and it very accurately depicts the bureaucratic nature of intelligence work: everything needs a paper trail, every action must be recorded. He recommends it as the most realistic portrayal.

vs alternatives

Unlike typical spy thrillers, it shows the mundane paperwork reality.

Personal experience

He hasn't watched it himself? He says 'Have you watched Akwarium? No. Well, watch it.' He seems to know it well, but earlier he said he doesn't watch spy movies. Possibly he saw it before his writing career or it's an exception. He doesn't clarify.

Akwarium. ... Well, it's shown very closely that everything requires a backing, a document, every action must be recorded. There are no actions like, I came up with this, so I'll go do it. It doesn't look like that.

Find Akwarium

Shelter location app (unnamed)

Tool

He mentions there is an app that shows shelter locations. He doesn't name it, but says people should use it to know where the nearest shelter is.

Where is the nearest, not even a shelter, a shelter near, because there is an app for that.

Find Shelter
Disclosed sponsorships3speaker disclosed

Cywil na wojnie

Book Sponsored · disclosed

A guide for civilians on how to behave during war: what to do during bombings, where to hide, what to have at home, how to survive difficult situations, how to prepare supplies, what to expect when called to the army, how to behave in the military, what to take, how to fight to survive, and how to act under occupation.

DisclosureAuthor is the expert himself, co-written with Kaczor.

Majcher says the book covers basic things like how to behave during bombings, how to prepare supplies, what to expect when conscripted, and how to act under occupation. It's co-written with Kaczor, who lives in Lviv and has firsthand experience of war. He says it's not a survivalist manual but a practical guide on how to behave in specific situations, where to push and where to back off.

vs alternatives

Unlike typical survivalist/prepper books, it focuses on urban survival and behavior rather than wilderness skills.

I included basic things, how to behave during bombings. ... how civilians should behave, where to hide, what to have at home, how to survive in such difficult situations.

Find Cywil

Alfabet wojny

Book Sponsored · disclosed

Similar to 'Cywil na wojnie', covering civilian war preparedness.

DisclosureAlso by the expert and Kaczor.

He mentions it alongside the other book, saying they contain all the advice he doesn't want to repeat in the interview.

On this topic, I wrote two books, I wouldn't want to repeat myself. This is Cywil na wojnie, but you can do a sneak peek more or less and Alfabet wojny.

Find Alfabet

Wygadani Weterani YouTube channel

Service Sponsored · disclosed

A YouTube channel where he, a former policeman, and a former diplomat will discuss various topics. He calls it an explosive mix.

DisclosureExpert is a participant in this channel.

He mentions it as a place where they will talk about similar preparedness topics. He says the group is impressive: a former policeman and a former diplomat.

By the way, we're coming back, I wanted to advertise here on YouTube as Wygadani Weterani, where they will be talking, meeting with people, and the group is respectable, because there's a former policeman and a former diplomat, right? So we'll also be talking about this. An explosive mix.

Find Wygadani

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

7 items
Contrary to appearances, it's boring and monotonous work.
Succinctly deflates the glamorous spy myth.
I believe more in the actions of organized crime mafia than in connected special services in Poland.
Shows his skepticism about conspiracy theories linking Polish services to organized crime.
Too much started being said after 2006. Before 2006, no one would have even thought about it, at least in the military services.
Highlights the watershed moment that broke the silence of former officers.
Listen, just half a year ago I thought war would never come here, but our ally has crumbled, and the most important one at that.
A stark reversal of his own threat assessment, naming the US.
Get your teeth fixed, because during war, those specialists will really be few.
Unexpected, practical, and memorable advice.
There are no lone commandos. I don't believe in such.
Dismisses the lone wolf survivalist fantasy.
No one has held prosecutors or judges accountable to this day, and no one even thought about it. One of them sits on the tribunal.
A biting critique of Poland's failure to achieve full transitional justice.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

intelligence-work-realityofficer-vs-agentwsi-vs-skw2006-reformagent-recruitmentpsychological-manipulationhoney-trapsrussian-intelligenceorganized-crime-vs-servicescivilian-war-preparednessdental-health-in-warmedication-stockpilingfood-storagewater-sourcesevacuation-backpackfirst-aid-trainingfirearm-ownership-risksshelter-appmilitary-training-inadequacyconscription
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.