UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Health Effects & Risks of Kratom, Opioids & Other Natural Occurring Medicines | Dr. Chris McCurdy
~178 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Health Effects & Risks of Kratom, Opioids & Other Natural Occurring Medicines | Dr. Chris McCurdy

Andrew Huberman
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Kratom is not a single substance — traditional leaf preparations differ dramatically from highly concentrated extracts and 7‑hydroxy‑mitragynine isolates, which behave like pure opioids and can cause respiratory depression on par with morphine.

2

Chris McCurdy’s research reveals that kratom’s 20–40 alkaloids hit opioid, serotonin, and adrenergic receptors simultaneously, creating a ‘symphony’ where lower doses (leaf) often provide mood/elevation benefits without euphoria, while high‑dose extracts and isolates push the opioid system hard.

3

Surveys of US kratom users indicate the majority are using it responsibly for energy, mood, and pain — not to get high — but physical dependence develops, ranging from caffeine‑like withdrawal with leaf to opioid‑like restless legs with stronger products.

4

McCurdy advocates for clear product labeling (serving size, extract vs. leaf) and warns against use in under‑25s because of developing brain risks, while noting that for some, kratom has helped them transition off prescription opioids without cravings.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

2 items

Use ‘Less Is More’ for Mood and Energy, Not for Getting High

WhatFor those seeking a gentle stimulant or mood lift, take the smallest amount of leaf‑based kratom that produces a noticeable benefit and avoid dose escalation; do not use it to chase euphoria or sedation.
WhenEach dosing occasion, particularly at the start of use and during the first weeks.
DoseNo exact milligram dose given; the principle is to stay at the lowest effective subjective dose, which for leaf powder is often a few grams (1–3 g) rather than heaped tablespoons.
For whomAdults using kratom for daily energy, mood, or mild pain, akin to a strong coffee.
WhyKratom’s tri‑partite pharmacology means low doses engage adrenergic and serotonin systems without pushing hard on mu‑opioid receptors, yielding stimulation and mood elevation without heavy sedation or rapid tolerance.
CaveatsTolerance to the analgesic effect can still occur, leading some to increase the dose; as dose climbs, the opioid component dominates and dependence shifts from caffeine‑like to opioid‑like (restless legs, severe dysphoria). Not suitable for under‑25s or those with addictive tendencies.

McCurdy repeatedly hears from long‑term leaf users that ‘less is more’ — they get better mood and energy from consistently low doses. He finds this pharmacologically puzzling because typical tolerance would blunt the effect, but he speculates that the multi‑receptor activity may avoid the steep tolerance curve seen with single‑target opioids. However, when people use kratom for pain, tolerance does develop, and that drives dose escalation. Once someone steps into extract territory, the ‘less is more’ rule evaporates and the risk of full opioid dependence rises sharply. The user population seeking a high is a real but smaller group, and they are probably the ones gravitating to concentrates.

Mechanism

At low concentrations, the alkaloids that hit serotonin and adrenergic receptors produce the main net effect; the mitragynine (and its 7‑OH metabolite) occupy only a small fraction of mu‑opioid receptors, insufficient to cause strong analgesia or euphoria. As dose rises, mu‑receptor occupancy increases and the sedative/euphoric opioid effects emerge.

The most frequent thing I hear from people that are using leaf products on a regular basis, they always say less is more. … I've struggled with that from a pharmacological standpoint … but I think it comes back to the group of users — what is their goal?

Avoid Kratom in Individuals Under ~25 Years Old

WhatDo not give or sell kratom to anyone younger than 25, and preferably 21 as a minimum, because the prefrontal cortex is still developing and psychoactive substances can disrupt that maturation.
WhenAlways; as a household rule or policy.
DoseNot applicable — the protocol is abstinence.
For whomParents, regulators, and retailers; aimed at protecting people under 18–25.
WhyCannabis research shows that early psychoactive drug use is associated with lower cognitive outcomes, and the same concern applies to any unstudied substance interacting with developing neural circuits. There is zero safety data in adolescents for kratom.
CaveatsSocietal norms accept 18 or 21 as legal cut‑offs; McCurdy personally thinks 25 would be ideal based on brain maturation timelines but acknowledges practical realities.

McCurdy worries about teenagers buying kratom shots from gas stations because a friend told them it’s cool. Traditional use in Southeast Asia is almost exclusively by adult male labourers; there is no tradition of children or adolescents using kratom. States that have enacted kratom regulations generally set the age at 18 or 21. The expert’s stance is that if we are serious about harm reduction, the age floor should reflect the neurobiology of addiction risk — the same reason car insurance rates drop at 25.

Mechanism

The prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control and long‑term planning, continues maturing until about age 25. Psychoactive drugs that modulate dopamine, serotonin, and opioid systems can alter synaptic pruning and circuit refinement, potentially reducing executive function and increasing addiction liability.

Personal experience

As a parent, McCurdy expresses personal fear that his own child could easily purchase a kratom product without understanding the risks.

I have great fear as a parent that my own child would go into one of these gas stations not knowing what they're getting … The drinking age should be 24, 25, just like when your insurance rates go down … because you have a prefrontal cortex.

Also said
“When you hijack that system with any substance that can be psychoactive, you run into problems.”— General principle supporting the age restriction.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

2 items

Kratom is a spectrum of products, not a single drug

early, after traditional use description

The traditional fresh‑leaf chewing or boiled tea delivers a mix of alkaloids slowly extracted by the body; dried leaf powders sold in the West are already different, and commercial extracts, concentrates, and semi‑synthetic isolates like 7‑hydroxy‑mitragynine are far more rapidly absorbed and potent, pushing the user into an opioid‑dominant effect.

Why this matters: This distinction is largely absent in public debate and regulatory talk — all kratom is dumped into one bucket, leading to both over‑generalised bans and consumer confusion.

Background

Previously, kratom was described as having both stimulant and sedative effects depending on dose, but that description came from traditional fresh‑leaf use. As products have proliferated in the West, the delivery form and concentration have radically changed the pharmacology.

McCurdy explains that fresh leaves, chewed or boiled into a decoction, require the body to work hard to extract alkaloids. In the US, leaves are dried and ground, often put into capsules or powders that people toss‑and‑wash. Even that is closer to traditional use than the extracts. When a solvent pulls alkaloids out of the leaf before ingestion, the compounds are pre‑dissolved and absorbed much faster, leading to a higher peak concentration and a more abrupt effect. This changes the dynamics from a gentle, gradual onset to a rapid, sometimes overwhelming exposure. The 7‑hydroxy‑mitragynine isolate, a metabolite of the main alkaloid mitragynine that may not even exist in the plant naturally, is pure opioid agonist and has been shown in their upcoming rat study to cause respiratory depression equal to standard opioids — yet it is sold as a ‘kratom‑derived’ product. McCurdy draws the analogy to alcohol: leaf is like light beer, extracts are like spirits, and isolates are like 190‑proof Everclear. Without labeling that distinguishes these, consumers can inadvertently ingest dangerously high doses.

What I described as the traditional use is freshly picked leaves that day … in the United States and in the Western world, it's a very different product from day one because it's a dried leaf material … as you start to make these concentrates and extracts and … isolates … you start to move ever so far across that spectrum.

Also said
“I like to equate it to the alcohol world where we talk about seltzers or light beers being more comparable … we get to things like almost pure alcohol Everclear … we don't have that delineation in the kratom space.”— Makes the dose/concentration gradient intuitive for a general audience.

Kratom withdrawal treated with buprenorphine may miss non‑opioid symptoms

mid‑episode, after discussing withdrawal

Clinicians are using buprenorphine to taper people off kratom, which addresses the opioid component but ignores the serotonin and adrenergic dependencies, potentially leaving unresolved symptoms and swapping one opioid dependence for another.

Why this matters: It flags a major clinical knowledge gap: the standard opioid‑use‑disorder protocol may be suboptimal for a substance with multi‑receptor pharmacology.

Background

Addiction physicians in Gainesville initially reported kratom helping their opioid patients; post‑COVID, they started seeing people seeking treatment to get off kratom itself, and they defaulted to buprenorphine because ‘it works’. No controlled studies exist.

McCurdy explains that because kratom is not a typical opioid (it also hits serotonin and adrenergic receptors), replacing it with a pure mu‑opioid like buprenorphine or methadone only pulls one lever. The patient may still experience mood instability, lethargy, or other withdrawal‑like phenomena driven by the serotonin and noradrenergic changes. He poses the open question: are those treatments truly the right approach, or could they make things worse by introducing a harder‑to‑quit opioid? At least one human case report (2008) described a man who quit Dilaudid with kratom leaf, then after a seizure from adding modafinil, quit kratom cold turkey with only a runny nose and no cravings — suggesting that dependence intensity varies enormously with product type and individual biology.

Personal experience

McCurdy has routine lunches with addiction physicians and hears both sides of the story directly.

Yes, we may have success in converting people from taking kratom by putting them on an opioid … but you're ignoring the serotonin piece … you're ignoring the adrenergic piece … Is that the right way? I don't know.

Also said
“The pharmacology of kratom is so complex and different that you're only pressing one of those levers in the system.”— Summarises the core pharmacological argument against one‑size‑fits‑all detox.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

2 items

Examine Kratom Product Labels for Serving Size and Ingredient Type

Practice

Because kratom products vary from leaf powder to concentrated extracts and 7‑OH isolates, and the packaging often hides multiple servings in a tiny bottle, consumers must actively check labels to avoid accidental overdose.

McCurdy points out that many extracts are sold in bottles containing up to 15 servings, but consumers may drink the whole bottle because it feels like a single‑use container. He also describes products placed next to 5‑Hour Energy shots, creating confusion. Checking the label for ‘kratom extract’, ‘kratom isolate’, or ‘7‑hydroxy‑mitragynine’ vs. ‘kratom leaf powder’ helps the user gauge potency and risk. He suggests this as a minimum harm‑reduction step, analogous to reading alcohol content on beverages.

vs alternatives

Unlike alcohol, where the alcohol‑by‑volume is clearly labeled and the product category (beer, wine, liquor) is obvious, kratom lacks standardised labeling; thus the burden is on the consumer.

You need to look at the serving size and know how many servings are in there absolutely … check serving size … and look for kratom derived or kratom extracted versus actual kratom plant product.

Also said
“A lot of times … I stopped at a Murphy USA gas station … they had kratom shots right next to the 5‑Hour Energy shots. If you were in a hurry, you might accidentally grab something that you thought was a 5‑Hour Energy.”— Demonstrates real‑world misidentification risk.
Find Examine

Coca‑Cola / Coke Syrup as a Historical GI Soothing Agent

Tool

McCurdy explains that Coca‑Cola’s original formula contained coca leaf and cola nut; today, the de‑cocainized coca leaf extract remains as the flavouring. In his pharmacy days, Coke syrup was sold over‑the‑counter for nausea and vomiting, and it is still considered by many as a mild GI calmative.

Coca‑Cola has a long history as a ‘soft drink’ alternative to hard liquor, originating at pharmacy soda fountains. The coca leaf extract (with cocaine alkaloids removed and sent to a pharmaceutical company) provides a unique flavour that cannot be fully replicated — hence the failed ‘New Coke’ episode. More importantly, even without the alkaloids, the extract appears to soothe the gastrointestinal tract, which is why coca tea is used in South America for stomach upset and why Coke syrup was traditionally recommended for morning sickness. McCurdy notes that this GI benefit is still present in the de‑alkaloidized extract, though the product is not marketed that way today.

vs alternatives

Compared to modern anti‑nausea drugs, Coke syrup is extremely mild, non‑sedating, and widely available, though it is less used today.

Personal experience

McCurdy recounts selling Coke syrup in the pharmacy for nausea, particularly in pregnancy.

Coke syrup we used to sell out of the pharmacy for nausea and vomiting, particularly in pregnant women … one of the safest things you could use, and it really calms and settles the GI tract.

Also said
“That same GI tract benefit is still there … probably what's still remaining within that extract that's now devoid of the alkaloids.”— Clarifies that the effect does not depend on cocaine.
Find Coca‑Cola

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
I look at this plant as almost a pharmaceutical shotgun. It's got different alkaloids that are targeting different systems in our body.
A vivid, memorable metaphor that encapsulates kratom’s complex pharmacology — one of the most quoted ways to explain why it’s ‘different’. Clears up why reductionist ‘one receptor’ thinking fails.
If it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, if it looks like a duck, it's a duck.
McCurdy’s blunt conclusion after showing that 7‑OH‑mitragynine causes opioid‑level respiratory depression — a punchy, plain‑English refutation of the myth that all kratom is safe.
We've lost totally in our culture where it is that medicines have come from. If you look at prescription medications … in the neighborhood of 75% … were either discovered because of a natural product or modified natural products.
A profound, grounding statement that reframes the entire plant‑medicine controversy. It connects kratom to a broad history (aspirin, morphine, metformin, GLP‑1) and challenges the artificial line between ‘natural’ and ‘drug’.
There's two types of mushroom hunters: good ones and dead ones.
A darkly humorous line that starkly illustrates the stakes of self‑experimentation with natural products, setting the tone for cautious exploration.
Seven Up had lithium in it in the past and it was for mind wellness. Pepsi had pepsinogen … Dr Pepper was developed by Dr Pepper in Waco, Texas … all these soft drinks have a really cool history.
A surprising historical nugget that shows how today’s mundane products once had active pharmacological ingredients, supporting the episode’s theme that we often consume ‘medicines’ unwittingly.
I don't know that anybody has evidence to demonstrate that yet. … If these products have only been in the marketplace for a couple of years, is there even a coding to put it into the FAERS database?
Sceptical transparency about a harm‑reduction claim made by 7‑OH advocates; shows the gulf between marketing and science.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

kratom-traditional-usekratom-extracts-vs-leaf7-hydroxy-mitragyninekratom-alkaloid-pharmacologyopioid-respiratory-depressionkratom-user-surveysphysical-dependence-spectrumkratom-withdrawal-treatmentcacao-theobromine-dopaminecoca-cola-historysoft-drink-pharmacologynatural-products-drug-discoverynicotine-neuroprotectionsalvinorin-kappa-opioiddeveloping-brain-risk
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.