Hubert Czerniak - Wkrótce zmuszą nas do tego! Czy te urządzenia są bezpieczne? Samochody elektryczne

Czerniak underpins this protocol with the same 400% glioma-increase figure he cited earlier, and with the story of the 18-year-old who habitually kept two phones beside his surviving testicle and developed cancer. He stresses that when the signal strength indicator drops to one or two bars, the phone ramps up its transmission power to stay connected, turning the pocket into a mini antenna field. He contrasts carrying the phone in a bag as a trivially simple but radically protective habit that is completely absent from school education. He also hints that for children, whose developing tissues are more vulnerable, the precautionary principle should be even stricter—yet public health authorities ignore the issue.

Czerniak frames the diesel engine as the last bastion of personal liberty—a machine powerful enough to move heavy industrial equipment and still safe enough that dropping a lit match into its fuel tank will not cause ignition. He contrasts this with the Hollywood image of exploding petrol cars and the unquenchable fires of lithium‑ion batteries. He acknowledges that diesels have been demonised by environmental activists, but points to the same countries that push electrification (Germany, USA, China) continuing to rely on diesel for their own heavy industry and military logistics. His recommendation is therefore both practical and symbolic: it rejects the electrification narrative while trusting real‑world reliability.

Czerniak ties the disappearance of cash to the carbon‑passport agenda. In a fully digital monetary system, spending on goods with a carbon footprint could be automatically curtailed when an individual’s “carbon account” is exhausted, irrespective of one’s bank balance. He sees physical cash as the last friction‑based barrier that prevents such granular control from being implemented seamlessly. He recalls that many freedom‑restricting historical regimes first moved to restrict cash, and claims the current drive towards a cashless society is the preparatory phase for behavioural conditioning under the guise of environmentalism.

Czerniak reports that firefighters are proactively calling for a ban on EVs in subterranean garages because the self‑oxidising fire consumes the vehicle completely and cannot be suppressed. The combustion releases hydrofluoric acid and other toxins that would fill a confined parking level within minutes. Unlike a petrol or diesel fire that can be starved of oxygen, an EV fire creates its own oxidiser and must burn until all reactive materials are spent. The logistical nightmare of extracting a burning, high‑voltage wreck from a basement makes prevention the only sane policy.

Czerniak acknowledges that within a dense urban core where traffic is already choked, small electric vehicles can be fun and convenient substitutes for walking or public transport. However, he stresses that any attempt to use them for a typical Polish cross‑country trip—e.g. Rzeszów to Szczecin—would add hours of charging time and force the driver to constantly monitor consumption, turning off heating and seat warmers in winter. He says the advertised range evaporates under real‑world load, and compares the sensation to nursing a scooter that might die at any moment. For him, the electric car is a toy, not a tool for serious mobility.

Czerniak walks through the photosynthetic cycle, quoting the Calvin-Benson equation to show plants consume CO₂ to build glucose and cellulose. He then cites the Triassic–Jurassic–Cretaceous periods when CO₂ concentrations were 4–6 times today’s level, resulting in trees living 200–300 years and animals weighing up to 60 tonnes. Haemoglobin releases oxygen more easily in a high-CO₂ environment, reducing cardiac workload and accelerating tissue regeneration—potentially extending lifespan. Today’s atmosphere, he claims, is chronically oxygen-poor relative to that optimum. The real driver of rising CO₂ is not human activity but a surge in volcanic eruptions; the Earth has moved from an average of one eruption per day to six or seven erupting continuously. He attributes this to the solar system’s drift toward the galactic centre, which he says also explains the Schumann resonance jumping from 7–8 Hz to 50 Hz and beyond, via a Doppler-like interference of electromagnetic waves from the galactic core. The 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption, he notes, supposedly matched a century of human CO₂ output yet caused no measurable atmospheric rise, illustrating how insignificant humanity really is.

Czerniak ties the rise in volcanism and global temperature to a long-term astronomical cycle: the solar system is entering a denser part of interstellar space—the ‘Hercules cloud’—which creates friction and slows the system’s motion, converting kinetic energy into heat. He further states that the fundamental electromagnetic resonance of the Earth-ionosphere cavity (Schumann resonance) has surged from a stable 7–8 Hz to peaks of 100 Hz, which he interprets as interference from the galactic core’s wave frequencies combining with the solar system’s own. This, he argues, is the true mechanism behind both the heightened geological unrest and perceived warming.

Czerniak presents charts: China emits 38% of global CO₂, the US 13%, the EU 8%. Within that EU slice, transport was about 20% in 2011 and has since fallen; thus the EU automotive sector contributes about 0.4% of total global emissions. He argues that converting all cars to electric would merely shift emissions into the electricity generation sector because of the massive increase in power demand, delivering no net climate benefit. This, he says, exposes the agenda as economic warfare rather than environmental protection, especially given that heavy industry in the West relies on diesel and jet fuel that cannot easily be replaced.

Czerniak cites research indicating a 400% increase in brain tumour incidence (gliomas) from just one hour of phone calls per day in adults. He emphasises that no equivalent studies exist for children, yet children are heavy users. He then analogises an electric car to a large mobile phone: its battery, power electronics, and wireless charging pads create a high‑intensity electromagnetic environment. Sitting inside for hours, especially with inductive charging plates under the car, exposes the pelvic region to non‑ionising radiation that he links to rising cancers of the testicles, ovaries, uterus, and bladder. He recounts a case of an 18‑year‑old male patient who had a testicular tumour removed and afterward habitually kept two mobile phones right beside his remaining testicle—implying a causal connection and lamenting the total absence of public education about this risk.

Czerniak explains that when an electric car catches fire, the battery cells release oxygen as they break down, making the fire self‑sustaining regardless of external suppression attempts. Firefighters are forced to spray water for up to 20 hours merely to cool the surroundings; the only effective method is to crane the burning vehicle into a special container and let it burn out completely. Consequently, emergency services are pushing for a ban on EVs in subterranean parking, because a single fire could poison the entire structure with toxic fumes and be impossible to extinguish. This fundamentally changes the risk calculus for insurers and infrastructure planners.

Czerniak points out that cobalt is essential for achieving high energy density in lithium‑ion cells, yet the supply is concentrated in the African copperbelt where artisanal mining employs children. Meanwhile, permanent magnets in EV motors require neodymium, praseodymium, and dysprosium—metals dominated by Chinese production. He notes that in Poland, significant rare‑earth deposits near Orzysz are now under exploration by US interests, hinting at a neo‑colonial resource grab. The first mass retirement of EV batteries is expected around 2030, but no industrial‑scale recycling process exists; he predicts batteries will follow the fate of e‑waste and be dumped in Africa or Asia, allowing Western consumers to maintain a “pseudo‑green mirage.”

Czerniak warns that under the guise of fighting climate change, authorities intend to assign every citizen a carbon budget. Once that virtual account is exhausted, the person would be denied access to goods or services that carry a carbon tag—notably flights—even if they have the financial means. He explicitly ties this to the parallel drive to abolish physical currency; with only digital money, a central authority can freeze or limit spending at will. He presents the retention of cash and the freedom to fill a diesel tank and drive 1 000 km as foundational acts of personal sovereignty.