ApoB and LDL particle count are far superior predictors of cardiovascular risk than LDL cholesterol — when they diverge, risk follows the particle metric every single time, and every patient should demand both tests.
2
Cholesterol and LDL-C are not the same thing: LDL-C is just the cholesterol cargo inside LDL particles; LDL-P (or apoB) counts the actual atherogenic vehicles, which is what drives plaque.
3
Phytosterols should not be supplemented: evolution built three layers of defense to keep plant sterols out of the human body, and per-molecule they are likely more atherogenic than cholesterol — measuring plasma phytosterols identifies hyper-absorbers who must never receive phytosterol supplements.
4
The Friedewald LDL-C formula breaks when triglycerides exceed ~150-200 mg/dL; above that threshold, use direct LDL-C or apoB/LDL-P directly.
Protocols
Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why
7 items
Order apoB and LDL-P alongside standard lipid panel — always
WhatAdd apoB (immunoassay) or LDL particle number (NMR) to every standard lipid panel, especially for patients with metabolic syndrome, high triglycerides, small dense LDL phenotype, or family history of premature ASCVD.
WhenBaseline cardiovascular risk assessment; any time LDL-C is being used to guide treatment; at least annually in patients on lipid-lowering therapy.
DoseSingle blood draw, fasting preferred. ApoB via immunoassay is widely available and less expensive than NMR; NMR additionally provides particle size distribution and VLDL-P.
For whomAll adults undergoing cardiovascular risk stratification. Highest priority: diabetics, metabolic syndrome, hypertriglyceridemia, patients on statins whose TG/HDL ratio is unfavorable.
WhyWhen apoB/LDL-P and LDL-C disagree (discordance), risk follows the particle metric. Treating to an LDL-C target without knowing the particle count leaves discordant patients either under-treated (high particle / normal LDL-C) or over-treated (low particle / high LDL-C from large buoyant LDL).
CaveatsIn the rare type III hyperlipoproteinemia (dysbetalipoproteinemia), apoB is elevated because VLDL remnants accumulate — in this case apoB reflects VLDL burden, not primarily LDL burden.
Dayspring insists this is not a fringe position — citing MESA and re-analyzed Framingham data that make the particle-superior-to-cholesterol finding 'unambiguous.' His frustration is institutional: guidelines and third-party payers have not caught up. Attia notes patients can self-order from LabCorp if their physician declines. Dayspring also emphasizes that when concordant (both high or both normal), either metric suffices; the clinical urgency is in discordant cases.
Mechanism
ApoB particles enter the arterial intima driven by a concentration gradient — more particles = more gradient pressure = more plaque deposition regardless of how much cholesterol each particle carries.
I would list LDL-P as one of the five most important metrics. And the fact that a patient would get into a position where they're having to argue with their doc about that is disconcerting.
Also said
“Either apoB or LDL particle number correlates a lot better with clinical events or the presence of atherosclerosis than the cholesterol measurement itself.”— Direct evidence statement from Dayspring summarizing the literature.
Use non-HDL-C as minimum upgrade from LDL-C when apoB unavailable
WhatCalculate non-HDL cholesterol (total cholesterol − HDL cholesterol) from the standard panel and use it as the primary treatment target, not LDL-C, when apoB or LDL-P cannot be obtained.
WhenAny clinical setting where advanced lipid testing is not accessible or not reimbursed.
DoseCalculated from existing panel — no additional blood draw. Non-HDL-C target: generally <130 mg/dL for average risk, <100 mg/dL for high risk, <70 mg/dL for very high risk (mirrors apoB target logic).
For whomAny patient, but especially those with elevated triglycerides where VLDL cholesterol is a significant fraction of total atherogenic particle burden.
WhyNon-HDL-C captures cholesterol in all apoB-containing particles (VLDL, IDL, LDL, Lp(a)), whereas LDL-C excludes VLDL and IDL. It correlates more tightly with apoB than LDL-C does.
CaveatsNon-HDL-C is still a cholesterol measure, not a particle count. Discordance between non-HDL-C and apoB/LDL-P can still occur, particularly in very high TG states.
Dayspring places non-HDL-C in a hierarchy: Total-C → LDL-C → Non-HDL-C → apoB/LDL-P. Each step better approximates true particle burden. Non-HDL-C was the 'new thing' being incorporated into guidelines at the time of this episode, partially because it required no new test.
Non-HDL cholesterol even better correlates with apoB or LDL particle concentration than does LDL cholesterol.
Measure plasma phytosterols before prescribing phytosterol supplements
WhatOrder a plasma sterol profile (sitosterol, campesterol, lathosterol) before giving any patient phytosterol-containing foods or supplements as a cholesterol-lowering strategy. If sitosterol or campesterol is already elevated, do not proceed with supplementation.
WhenBefore prescribing phytosterol-enriched margarine, supplements, or functional foods. Also useful at baseline in patients with premature ASCVD — may reveal sitosterolemia.
DoseSingle fasting blood draw. Available at specialty lipid labs (e.g., LabCorp advanced panel). Lathosterol measures cholesterol synthesis; sitosterol/campesterol measure absorption.
For whomAny patient being considered for phytosterol supplementation; any patient with unexplained high apoB despite low LDL-C; patients with xanthomas or premature ASCVD of unclear etiology.
WhyApproximately 10-15% of people are hyper-absorbers of sterols due to overactive NPC1L1 or loss-of-function ABCG5/G8 variants. In these individuals, supplemental phytosterols accumulate in plasma and LDL particles, potentially increasing atherogenic risk per Dayspring's review of the data.
CaveatsA minority of patients who are not hyper-absorbers may safely achieve modest LDL-C reduction via competitive inhibition of cholesterol absorption. The benefit is real but must be weighed against the sterol accumulation risk in absorbers.
Dayspring's evolutionary argument is compelling: NPC1L1 prefers cholesterol over phytosterols; ACAT barely esterifies phytosterols; ABCG5/G8 evicts phytosterols before cholesterol. Three independent layers of defense suggest evolution regarded circulating phytosterols as harmful. The extreme case — sitosterolemia (homozygous ABCG5/G8 loss-of-function) — causes massive sterol accumulation and early coronary artery disease, demonstrating pathological potential even at modest elevations.
Mechanism
Hyper-absorbed phytosterols travel in LDL particles into the arterial intima, where they may trigger more inflammatory macrophage response than cholesterol itself due to structural differences in how foam cells process them.
I beg anybody who's a big advocate of supplementing phytosterols — please monitor phytosterols in the bloodstream. That's how you identify the one person I absolutely should not be giving these to.
Switch to direct LDL-C or apoB when fasting triglycerides exceed 150-200 mg/dL
WhatDo not use Friedewald-calculated LDL-C for clinical decision-making when fasting triglycerides are ≥150 mg/dL. Instead, order direct LDL-C assay or apoB/LDL-P.
WhenAny metabolic syndrome patient, any patient on a high-carbohydrate diet, any patient with elevated fasting TG on standard lipid panel.
DoseOne-time protocol change — most labs now offer direct LDL-C as a reflex add-on when TG is flagged.
For whomPatients with TG ≥150; patients with diabetes, insulin resistance, or metabolic syndrome; patients on medications that elevate TG (antipsychotics, corticosteroids, beta-blockers).
WhyThe Friedewald formula assumes VLDL-C = TG ÷ 5, based on a 1970s average VLDL composition. As TG rises, VLDL particles become increasingly TG-enriched relative to cholesterol, invalidating the ÷5 ratio. The result is systematic underestimation of LDL-C in the patients most likely to have metabolic syndrome.
CaveatsEven direct LDL-C can be unreliable in very high TG states (>400 mg/dL) in some labs. ApoB or LDL-P remains the most robust measure regardless of TG level.
Dayspring: 'Triglycerides... the formula would be useless. They actually develop the direct LDL-C to give us a metric in people with triglycerides of 800, 1200, 4000.' The Hopkins Martin-Hopkins equation (developed after this episode aired) significantly reduces error in the 150-400 TG range vs Friedewald. Until direct assays or apoB are universally adopted, the Hopkins formula is a meaningful interim improvement.
Mechanism
Friedewald's VLDL cholesterol estimate (TG/5) assumes a fixed TG:cholesterol ratio of 5:1 inside VLDL. Hypertriglyceridemia shifts VLDL composition to higher TG fraction, so actual VLDL-C is less than TG/5, making calculated LDL-C appear falsely lower than true LDL-C.
Somewhere between a triglyceride 150 and 200 — and the higher you go above 200, be careful with a calculated LDL cholesterol and rely on direct LDL-C.
Use lathosterol:sitosterol ratio as absorber vs. synthesizer phenotype test
WhatInterpret plasma lathosterol (a cholesterol synthesis marker — precursor in the Kandutsch-Russell pathway) alongside sitosterol/campesterol (absorption markers). A high lathosterol with low plant sterols = over-synthesizer; low lathosterol with high plant sterols = hyper-absorber. Each phenotype has different optimal therapy.
WhenAdvanced lipid workup for patients with refractory hypercholesterolemia; patients poorly responsive to statins (common in over-synthesizers); patients with suspected absorber phenotype before initiating ezetimibe.
DoseSingle fasting plasma sterol profile. Lathosterol is reported in the same panel as phytosterols.
For whomLipid-specialist context: patients with high apoB despite adequate statin therapy, patients intolerant to statins, patients being considered for combination therapy.
WhyStatins are most effective in over-synthesizers (high lathosterol) because they hit the rate-limiting synthetic step. Ezetimibe is most effective in hyper-absorbers (high plant sterols) because it blocks the NPC1L1 absorption step. Phenotyping allows precision matching of therapy to mechanism.
Dayspring explains that lathosterol — a cholesterol precursor in the Kandutsch-Russell synthetic pathway — can be measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and serves as a marker of endogenous synthesis rate. 'If it was up, hey, you're over-synthesizing cholesterol.' The bifurcated Bloch and Kandutsch-Russell pathways both terminate in cholesterol but use different penultimate intermediates (desmosterol vs. lathosterol/laosterol). Knowing which branch dominates informs therapeutic selection.
Mechanism
Lathosterol rises when cells are actively synthesizing cholesterol via the HMG-CoA reductase pathway. Its plasma level reflects whole-body synthesis rate. Sitosterol/campesterol plasma levels reflect intestinal absorption efficiency — directly proportional to NPC1L1 expression and inversely proportional to ABCG5/G8 export capacity.
A lab with liquid chromatography and mass spec could give you a low-cost lathosterol measurement and if it was up — hey, you're over-synthesizing cholesterol.
Never draw a lipid panel during acute illness, surgery, or systemic inflammatory response
WhatDefer lipid testing until ≥4-6 weeks after resolution of any acute illness, major surgery, trauma, or hospitalization. If acute measurement was obtained, do not act on it clinically.
WhenStandard pre-screening for lipid panel orders; any patient recently discharged from hospital.
DoseWait at least 4-6 weeks post-acute illness for representative lipid values.
For whomAny patient with recent hospitalization, acute infection, major surgery, MI, or other high-stress event.
WhySystemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) causes acute redistribution of cholesterol away from plasma toward steroidogenic tissues (adrenal cortex ramps up glucocorticoid production). HDL-C can plummet acutely, LDL-C shifts, and the values are physiologically meaningless as cardiovascular risk markers.
CaveatsA massive drop in HDL-C in an acute hospital setting may be a marker of illness severity (adrenal cholesterol demand) rather than a chronic cardiovascular risk factor.
Attia describes noticing during residency that HDL-C plummeted whenever patients entered SIRS. His retrospective explanation: the adrenal glands dramatically upregulate steroid hormone synthesis during physiologic crisis and upregulate LDL receptor expression to supply substrate. This is a reversible, demand-driven reallocation — not chronic lipid pathology. Drawing and treating a lipid panel in this context would be both inaccurate and potentially harmful.
By the way, it's the reason you never do a lipid profile in an acute situation, because a lot of lipids are gonna be transiently changed.
Understand the NPC1L1-ABCG5/G8 absorber-gatekeeper system before interpreting plasma sterols
WhatWhen evaluating any patient's plasma sterol results (cholesterol, phytosterols, stanols), interpret them through the lens of two opposing systems: NPC1L1 (the importer, inhibited by ezetimibe) and ABCG5/G8 heterodimer (the exporter, mutated in sitosterolemia). Net absorption = import rate minus export rate.
WhenAny discussion of ezetimibe therapy, phytosterol supplementation, bile acid sequestrant therapy, or workup for sitosterolemia.
DoseClinical knowledge framework — not a discrete test, but informs test interpretation.
For whomClinicians managing patients with unexplained hypercholesterolemia, statin non-responders, or patients with premature ASCVD of unclear etiology.
WhyDayspring's 'ticket-taker and bouncer' model: NPC1L1 lets all sterols in with broad selectivity (highest affinity for cholesterol, lower for phytosterols, minimal for stanols); ABCG5/G8 evicts them in reverse order (phytosterols first, stanols second, cholesterol third). Net circulating sterol levels reflect the balance between these two systems.
The system's selectivity is a window into evolutionary priorities: NPC1L1 is most eager for cholesterol (essential nutrient), ABCG5/G8 is most eager to expel phytosterols (xenosterols). Stanols (fully saturated sterols produced by gut microbiota from biliary cholesterol) are virtually non-absorbable under normal conditions because they are the lowest-affinity NPC1L1 substrates and are rapidly ABCG5/G8-exported — hence why stanols in food don't accumulate in plasma.
Mechanism
NPC1L1 is a cholesterol-binding transporter on the apical (luminal) face of enterocytes. ABCG5/G8 is an ATP-dependent heterodimeric efflux pump on the same apical face that returns sterols to the lumen. Net cholesterol absorbed = NPC1L1 uptake minus ABCG5/G8 export minus ACAT esterification efficiency.
NPC1L1 is the ticket-taker at the bar — he lets everybody in if you can fit the door. But then you've got this ATP-binding cassette G5, G8 — and that's the bouncer, that's the enforcer, making some sort of decision about you're a good guy, you're a bad guy.
What's new
Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions
8 items
ApoB vs LDL-C discordance — risk always follows the particle
~slice 2
When apoB (or LDL-P) and LDL cholesterol disagree, every clinical trial ever examined shows that cardiovascular risk tracks the particle count, not the cholesterol mass. Concordant patients can use either metric; discordant patients get misinformation from LDL-C alone.
Why this matters: Huge fraction of apparently 'normal' LDL-C patients carry elevated particle burden and elevated risk — this discordance is the core reason standard lipid panels fail.
Background
The field spent decades optimizing LDL-C measurement because it was the first calculable proxy for atherogenic lipoprotein burden. ApoB and NMR LDL-P only became widely available later and revealed the discordance problem at scale.
Dayspring explains the particle-cholesterol split mechanistically: small LDL particles carry less cholesterol per particle, so a patient with small-LDL phenotype can have a normal LDL-C while running 2000+ nmol/L LDL-P — roughly double the atherogenic burden implied by the cholesterol number. The MESA and re-examined Framingham data made this 'unambiguously clear.' Attia argues that LDL-P should be on the standard five most important metrics every patient receives, and that patients who cannot get apoB/LDL-P ordered by their physician can access LabCorp directly without a prescription.
In virtually every single trial ever looked at, the risk follows the particle metric more than the cholesterol metric.
Also said
“The only way to know who is discordant with a cholesterol metric and an apoB or an LDL particle metric is to do both of them.”— The practical protocol: order both, compare, act on the particle result when they disagree.
Non-HDL cholesterol is a better poor-man's apoB than LDL-C
~slice 2
Non-HDL cholesterol (total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) captures the cholesterol in all apoB-containing particles — VLDL, IDL, LDL, and Lp(a) — and therefore correlates more tightly with apoB and LDL particle number than LDL-C alone.
Why this matters: Non-HDL-C is already on most standard panels and free to calculate; physicians who cannot or will not order apoB can use non-HDL-C as a meaningful upgrade from LDL-C.
Background
The Friedewald calculation yields LDL-C by subtracting HDL-C and estimated VLDL-C from total cholesterol. Non-HDL-C simply omits the HDL subtraction step, keeping all atherogenic-particle cholesterol in the number.
Dayspring's hierarchy: total cholesterol is the crudest proxy for apoB burden; LDL-C is a better proxy; non-HDL-C is better still; apoB or LDL-P is the actual measurement. The newer Hopkins-derived LDL-C calculation (replacing Friedewald) also improves accuracy at high TG, but non-HDL-C is immediately available on any standard panel without additional testing.
We've come to the realization and if we get another calculation called non-HDL cholesterol that even better correlates with apoB or LDL particle concentration than does LDL cholesterol.
Friedewald formula fails above ~150-200 mg/dL triglycerides
~slice 2
The Friedewald equation estimates VLDL cholesterol as triglycerides ÷ 5, derived from a 1970s assumption that VLDL particles contain 5× more triglyceride than cholesterol. As triglycerides rise above 150-200 mg/dL, this ratio breaks down and calculated LDL-C systematically underestimates true LDL-C.
Why this matters: Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance are driving population-wide TG elevations — precisely the patients where Friedewald-derived LDL-C is most misleading.
Background
The formula was essential when direct LDL-C assays didn't exist. Direct assay technology now makes the calculated version obsolete in high-TG patients. Above 400 mg/dL TG, the formula is explicitly flagged as unusable by most guidelines.
Dayspring notes: 'They actually develop the direct LDL-C to give us a LDL cholesterol metric and people with triglycerides of eight hundred, twelve hundred, four thousand — we now know what their LDL cholesterol is, whereas the formula would be useless.' The Hopkins-derived new formula tightens accuracy in the 150-400 TG range where Friedewald begins to drift but hasn't failed completely.
Somewhere between a triglyceride 150 and 200 and the higher you go above 200 — be careful with a calculated LDL cholesterol and rely on direct LDL-C.
Phytosterols are atherogenic per molecule — supplementation is dangerous in hyper-absorbers
~slice 3
Plant sterols structurally resemble cholesterol but are specifically excluded by three evolutionary gatekeeping systems: the Niemann-Pick C1L1 importer prefers cholesterol, ACAT (esterification) enzyme barely esterifies phytosterols, and ABC G5/G8 exporters evict phytosterols before cholesterol. Elevated plasma phytosterols indicate a hyper-absorber phenotype and confer independent cardiovascular risk.
Why this matters: Phytosterol-enriched margarines and supplements are widely marketed as heart-healthy cholesterol-lowering. In the ~10-15% of people who are hyper-absorbers, supplementation may be actively harmful.
Background
The conventional rationale for phytosterol supplementation is competitive inhibition of cholesterol absorption at the intestinal brush border, modestly lowering LDL-C. Dayspring's counter: this logic fixates on the LDL-C number rather than the particle burden, and ignores the phytosterol molecules now circulating in those same particles.
Dayspring: 'Data shows that phytosterols on a per molecule basis are probably more atherogenic than cholesterol.' The clinical protocol he advocates: before prescribing phytosterol supplements, measure plasma sitosterol and campesterol. A hyper-absorber — defined by loss-of-function variants in ABCG5/G8 or over-expression of NPC1L1 — will accumulate plant sterols in LDL particles and deliver them to the arterial wall, where they act like cholesterol but may be more pro-inflammatory. The fact that evolution built three sequential barriers (NPC1L1 uptake selectivity, ACAT esterification selectivity, ABCG5/G8 efflux preference) against phytosterols entering the body is Dayspring's strongest evidence that they were never meant to circulate.
Please monitor phytosterols in the bloodstream — that's how you identify, oh my god, you're the one person I absolutely should not be giving these to.
Also said
“There's data to show that phytosterols on a per molecule basis are probably more atherogenic than cholesterol.”— The key clinical risk claim: supplementation may increase plaque formation in susceptible individuals.
Trans-intestinal cholesterol efflux (TICE): a major reverse-cholesterol-transport pathway separate from hepatic RCT
~slice 3
Reverse cholesterol transport is not solely hepatic — a substantial fraction (estimated 20-60% in humans) of cholesterol is delivered directly from circulation to intestinal enterocytes and excreted via ABC G5/G8 into the gut lumen, bypassing the liver entirely. This pathway, trans-intestinal cholesterol efflux (TICE), is a major fecal cholesterol elimination route.
Why this matters: The traditional HDL-to-liver reverse cholesterol transport story is incomplete. TICE is clinically relevant because drugs targeting intestinal sterol export could lower apoB burden independently of hepatic pathways.
Background
TICE had been demonstrated in animal models for years before human confirmation. Dayspring cites a then-unpublished Journal of Clinical Lipidology case study of a patient who had lost biliary function and yet continued to clear cholesterol effectively via the intestinal route.
Dayspring describes the enterocyte as having two efflux portals: ABCG5/G8 on the luminal face (excretes sterols to stool) and ABCA1 on the basolateral face (loads sterols onto nascent HDL for return to circulation). TICE uses the luminal portal, driven by cholesterol delivered to enterocytes from plasma-side lipoproteins or albumin — not from dietary absorption. The clinical implication is that statins and PCSK9 inhibitors, which lower LDL-C by increasing hepatic uptake, do not necessarily maximize fecal sterol excretion; TICE-targeting strategies could add complementary benefit.
The process of a lipoprotein or some other trafficker — albumin, red blood cells — bringing cholesterol back to the small intestine, bypassing the liver, gets right out into your stool — is called trans-intestinal cholesterol efflux.
Cholesterol cannot be metabolized for energy — a deliberate evolutionary design
~slice 4
Despite being a fat with many carbon-hydrogen bonds, cholesterol cannot be oxidized for ATP. No enzymatic machinery exists in any human cell to catabolize its ring structure. Attia proposes this is evolutionarily deliberate: if cholesterol could fuel the cell during fasting, cells would cannibalize their membranes and steroidogenic machinery during starvation.
Why this matters: Counters a common misconception; also explains why ketosis evolved — as the energy alternative that spares both muscle and membrane cholesterol during caloric deficit.
Dayspring endorses the hypothesis as 'brilliant': 'cholesterol is not producing energy, cholesterol cannot be metabolized and produced ATP.' Cholesterol can be converted to bile acids (hepatocytes), steroid hormones (adrenal cortex, gonads), or excreted — those are the only fates. The rigidity of this design allows plasma LDL-C to be driven very low by PCSK9 inhibitors without compromising cellular cholesterol homeostasis, because every cell autonomously synthesizes what it needs via the mevalonate pathway.
To me, that's a very deliberate design — no matter what, your cholesterol and your hormones are off-limits during starvation. And instead, we evolved this other remarkable pathway of ketosis.
Brain cholesterol is a completely independent system — blood LDL has zero access
~slice 4
The brain synthesizes 100% of its own cholesterol. LDL particles cannot cross the blood-brain barrier (apoB100 is too large), and even HDL transport across is minimal. Intra-CNS sterol trafficking uses apoE as the carrier rather than apoB. Blood lipid measurements have no relevance to brain cholesterol status.
Why this matters: Addresses the recurring patient concern that statins 'starve the brain of cholesterol' — blood cholesterol and brain cholesterol are disconnected systems.
Dayspring: 'Cholesterol lipidology in the brain might as well be in another different body — it has nothing to do with what's going on in the rest of your body.' ApoE in the CNS performs the same lipid-trafficking role that apoB100 performs peripherally, but it is the peripheral apoE variant (E2/E3/E4) that determines Alzheimer's risk through mechanisms unrelated to circulating lipid levels. The brain's autonomy explains why individuals with PCSK9 gain-of-function mutations (extremely low circulating LDL) show no cognitive deficits — the brain simply ramps up its own mevalonate pathway activity.
The brain makes every cholesterol molecule it needs and therefore there are no LDL particles delivering cholesterol to your brain.
One apoB per atherogenic particle — the defining property that makes it a perfect particle counter
~slice 2
Every VLDL, IDL, and LDL particle contains exactly one molecule of apoB100, which is non-transferable across its entire lifespan. This stoichiometric 1:1 ratio means a plasma apoB concentration is a direct count of atherogenic particles. By contrast, cholesterol distributes unequally across particles depending on their size.
Why this matters: This is the foundational reason apoB is not just 'another lipid marker' — it is structurally equivalent to a particle count, which is what predicts endothelial penetration.
Dayspring explains that apoB100's non-transferability is due to its structural role: it provides the 'structural integrity' of the particle and serves as the ligand for the LDL receptor. Unlike apoC1, apoC2, apoC3, and apoE, which freely exchange between particles, apoB stays on the particle from synthesis to catabolism. The LDL receptor 'lock' reads the apoB 'key' to internalize the particle when cells express it. A particle lacking apoB (e.g., an HDL) has no LDL-receptor ligand and is cleared by entirely different machinery. Because 95% of apoB particles are LDL, plasma apoB is essentially an LDL particle count for clinical purposes — VLDL and IDL contribute the remaining ~5%.
There is one apoB on every VLDL, IDL, and LDL. But 95% of the apoB particles are LDL. So apoB is just a way for the labs to report to you what an LDL particle concentration is.
Recommendations
Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode
2 items
LabCorp direct-access apoB / LDL-P testing
Service
In the US, patients can self-order an apoB or NMR LDL-P test directly from LabCorp without a physician's prescription when their doctor refuses to order particle-based testing.
Attia and Dayspring express frustration that some cardiologists actively dismiss apoB and LDL-P as unnecessary. Their practical advice: don't fight the doctor, go around the system. Dayspring notes he would 'deliver 200 manuscripts to your desktop tomorrow' to any physician who challenged the literature. The self-pay cost is modest relative to the clinical decision value.
At least in the United States, I think anybody can go to LabCorp directly and get the assay without a physician's prescription.
Dayspring sends a weekly email to a select group of lipid specialists summarizing the most important new lipid paper with a 300-word digest. His Twitter feed provides public access to open-access papers with brief commentary.
Attia describes the emails as unusually high-signal: 'You'll say, look, I know all of you aren't gonna read this 12-page paper — here's a 300-word summary of what you would learn.' Bob Kaplan specifically asked to be added to the distribution. Dayspring notes he cannot attach PDFs due to copyright but links to open-access papers.
Your emails are sometimes so great because what you'll do is you'll say, look, I know all of you aren't gonna read this 12-page paper — here's like a 300-word summary of what you would learn.
True Health Diagnostics offered comprehensive lipid panels including apoB, LDL-P, particle size, phytosterols, lathosterol, and other advanced markers unavailable on standard hospital panels.
DisclosureDayspring is Scientific and Academic Advisor to True Health Diagnostics — disclosed explicitly.
Dayspring describes his role: 'to stay on top of the literature, know all this stuff and explain it — I have the freedom every day to spend time reading.' The company provides educational materials for physicians and advanced testing for patients.
True Health Diagnostics — that's the only company I work for nowadays, and I'm their scientific academic advisor.
Peter Attia blog and Nerd Safari at peterattiamd.com
Book Sponsored · disclosed
Attia's website hosts show notes for this episode including diagrams of lipoprotein structure, cholesterol synthesis pathways, and the sterol absorption system referenced throughout the conversation.
DisclosureAttia's own platform — self-promotion at episode close.
Dayspring and Attia both note that the visual diagrams accompanying the episode are essential for fully understanding the audio content. The 'Nerd Safari' section of the site is Attia's curated deep-dive blog. Lipid series show notes were among the most downloaded educational resources on the site at the time.
You can find more information on today's episode and other topics at PeterAttiaMD.com.
Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased
5 items
Don't tell me your LDL is this — because LDL is a low-density lipoprotein, it's not a laboratory metric. You want to tell me what the LDL cholesterol is, the LDL particle number is, the lipidome of an LDL is, the LDL oxidized or not.
Dayspring's core frustration: the word 'LDL' is used colloquially to mean LDL-C, collapsing the distinction between the vehicle and its cargo. The correction is the entire premise of this episode.
In virtually every single trial ever looked at, the risk follows the particle metric more than the cholesterol metric.
The strongest summary statement in the episode — not a nuanced claim but a sweeping empirical generalization across all lipid trials. Establishes why apoB/LDL-P supersedes LDL-C.
Atherosclerosis is just the evidence of illegal dumping — where a lipoprotein, instead of bringing lipids to wherever it's supposed to be bringing it, was bringing sterols to the artery wall, and over decades you got a problem.
Dayspring's Jersey guy analogy — makes the atherogenic mechanism viscerally intuitive. The problem is delivery to the wrong address.
If I measured phytosterols in your HDL and they're very high, it's probably a type of dysfunctional HDL particle.
Novel diagnostic heuristic from Dayspring — phytosterol-loaded HDL as a marker of both absorber phenotype and HDL dysfunction.
The misinformation on labeling lipid metrics is one of the things that hasn't given me a stroke yet. I will reject a paper instantly that uses improper lipid metrics — don't tell me your LDL is this.
Dayspring as peer reviewer enforcing terminological precision. Signals how deeply this mislabeling pervades the medical literature.
Sign in to share feedback
Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.
Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.
Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.