climbing-without-oxygen-safer-than-with-oxygen
early discussion on oxygen usageKrzyżowski claims that using supplemental oxygen introduces a catastrophic single-point-of-failure, while climbing without it forces the body to adapt, making the approach safer overall.
Why this matters: It flips the conventional view that bottled oxygen is a safety net; he argues it’s a dangerous dependency that can kill you if the system fails.
Most commercial clients on 8000 m peaks use bottled oxygen, which effectively lowers the mountain by 2000 m, making it easier but creating a reliance on equipment.
Krzyżowski describes that when someone uses oxygen at altitude, their experience of the mountain drops by about 2 km — climbing an 8000 m peak feels like a 6000 m peak. The mask seals them off from the real environment; they don’t get out of breath, they feel warm, and they don’t feel thirst or hunger because the oxygen acts like fuel. However, if the apparatus fails — the mask freezes, the regulator breaks, the hose tears, or the bottle runs out — the body is suddenly exposed to a brutally rarefied atmosphere it is not acclimatized to. He compares this to a spacecraft hatch being blown open; death typically occurs within 2–3 hours. By contrast, a properly acclimatized no-O2 climber knows their body can function in that thin air and isn’t relying on a fragile technical chain. He believes many commercial climbers don’t appreciate this risk and place uncritical faith in agencies and young Sherpas.
He has always climbed without oxygen and emphasizes that he trains his body to operate in that zone, only carrying emergency medication. On Everest, other climbers told him to turn back because he had no oxygen and would die; he continued and summited safely.
it's a bit like someone suddenly opening the door of a spaceship and exposing you to outer space After about three hours, after two hours you simply die

