Aging is an information-loss problem: sirtuins leave their silencing posts to repair DNA breaks, epigenetic patterns get corrupted over decades, and cells lose their identity — but a cellular 'backup copy' still exists that can be accessed to partially reverse the clock.
2
Sinclair's lab restored vision in mice with crushed optic nerves, glaucoma, and natural age-related decline using three partial Yamanaka reprogramming factors (OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 — excluding MYC) delivered via AAV with a doxycycline on/off switch — the first in-vivo demonstration that cellular age can be reversed after damage.
3
NAD+ is the essential fuel for sirtuins; levels decline with age, and Sinclair takes 1 gram of NMN daily plus 1 gram of resveratrol to activate SIRT1, while stressing that NR/NMN may primarily benefit those who are metabolically stressed rather than already optimized.
4
Sinclair personally takes metformin only when not exercising (to avoid blunting mitochondrial biogenesis), fasts regularly to slow the epigenetic clock, and treats the Horvath methylation clock as the most actionable aging biomarker currently available.
Protocols
Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why
6 items
Resveratrol 1 gram daily with a fat-containing meal
WhatTake 1 gram of resveratrol powder or capsules in the morning with a small fat-containing food (Sinclair uses yogurt he makes at home) to improve absorption.
WhenDaily in the morning, taken with fat to maximize bioavailability.
Dose1 gram per day (1,000 mg). Sinclair has taken this dose consistently for many years as his longest ongoing personal experiment.
For whomSinclair takes it himself and notes benefits are more pronounced in metabolically stressed or sedentary individuals than in already-optimized athletes. For those who exercise regularly and eat well, the marginal benefit is uncertain.
WhyResveratrol activates SIRT1 via allosteric binding — confirmed definitively in Sinclair's 10-year knockin mouse experiment. SIRT1 activation helps maintain epigenomic fidelity by keeping the sirtuin proteins on the genome performing their silencing function rather than being distracted by stress signals.
CaveatsThe ITP study found no lifespan extension in healthy lean mice — benefits appear concentrated in animals or people under metabolic stress. Pterostilbene is structurally similar (two methyl groups vs. three hydroxyl groups on resveratrol) and sold as a superior alternative, but Sinclair states there is no robust data showing it is more potent in vivo.
Resveratrol occurs naturally in red wine, grape skins, and Japanese knotweed — but at concentrations hundreds to thousands of times lower than the therapeutic dose. A typical glass of red wine contains 0.3–1 mg of resveratrol; Sinclair's 1,000 mg dose is roughly 1,000x a glass of wine. Fat co-ingestion increases absorption because resveratrol is lipophilic and is absorbed via chylomicrons in the lymphatic system, largely bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism that would otherwise metabolize it.
Mechanism
Resveratrol acts as an allosteric activator of SIRT1 by acting as a 'molecular glue' between the enzyme and an LXXLL motif on substrate proteins. This induces a conformational change at the enzyme's 'elbow,' increasing NAD+-dependent deacetylase activity and thereby helping maintain heterochromatin structure and epigenomic silencing.
I continue to take was very tall because it's cheap its harmless as far as we know but the evidence keeps stacking up that long-term is beneficial... the molecule I take a gram of resveratrol in the morning it's high dose it seemed to be fine
NMN supplementation as NAD+ precursor
WhatTake NMN (nicotinamide mononucleotide) orally as a NAD+ precursor. Sinclair's lab is actively testing novel pro-drugs of NAD+ boosters at the Brigham and Women's Hospital. NMN is two steps from NAD+ (NMN to NAD+), compared to NR which is three steps (NR to NMN to NAD+).
WhenDaily. Sinclair discusses the sublingual (under-tongue) route as a potential way to bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism.
DoseThe clinical study discussed used 1,000 mg/day of NR (4x the label dose on commercial products). Sinclair's personal dose of NMN is not stated exactly but described as ongoing.
For whomMost evidence supports benefits in older or metabolically compromised individuals where NAD+ is already depleted. Young healthy mice on NMN do not run further — unless simultaneously exercised, suggesting the precursor provides fuel but not the trigger.
WhyNAD+ is the obligate fuel for sirtuins — without it, SIRT1 cannot perform deacetylation regardless of resveratrol or exercise. NAD+ levels decline with age, potentially limiting sirtuin activity even when activation signals are present. Raising NAD+ in aged mice restores cardiovascular function and running capacity to young-mouse levels.
CaveatsThe NAM (nicotinamide) byproduct of sirtuin activity is itself a potent SIRT1 inhibitor. High-dose niacin raises NAD+ but also produces high NAM, blunting sirtuin activity. The meaningful metric is the NAD+/NAM ratio, not total NAD+. Oral NR is heavily captured by the liver; whether enough escapes to raise muscle NAD+ is dose-dependent and still debated.
At 1,000 mg/day NR, a placebo-controlled human trial showed muscle NAD+ rose — suggesting that at high enough doses, NR does escape hepatic capture and reach peripheral tissues. Mitochondrial markers of activity paradoxically went down in that study, though Sinclair speculates this could reflect improved mitochondrial efficiency. NMN may have advantages over NR: it is one step closer to NAD+ and some data suggests it has a distinct gut-transporter pathway that partially bypasses microbiome degradation.
Mechanism
NMN enters cells via a gut transporter (Slc12a8 in mice; debated in humans) or is converted to NR in the gut then taken up via the NR transporter. Inside cells, NMN is converted to NAD+ by NMNAT enzymes. Elevated NAD+ allosterically activates sirtuins and also activates PARP1 for DNA repair.
the idea is that by either replacing lost nad or boosting it to levels that you would only get if you run marathons constantly you can turn on these sirtuin defenses
Also said
“raising them above normal levels in an old animal get you back to having a young cardiovascular system and they can run just as far as young Mouse but when he gave nad boosters to the young mice they didn't run further but they did if we exercise them and gave them the nad booster at the same time”— Quantifies the dose-response: NMN provides fuel but requires an activation signal (exercise or fasting) to produce the full functional benefit in young animals.
Metformin pulsed — skip on heavy exercise days
WhatTake metformin on days without intense exercise, or during travel and sedentary periods. Skip on days with hard workouts.
WhenTimed to avoid the post-exercise mitochondrial biogenesis window. Sinclair takes it when traveling by plane or train (when he will not exercise), and skips it when at home exercising several times a week.
DoseSinclair does not state his exact dose. He describes taking it irregularly based on stomach tolerance and exercise schedule.
For whomMost valuable for metabolically unhealthy individuals. For the already fit and optimized, benefits are unclear and the exercise-blunting risk is real.
WhyMetformin's primary mechanism is mild inhibition of Complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. This triggers mitochondrial biogenesis and AMPK activation — beneficial effects. But this same mild inhibition may blunt the mitochondrial biogenesis signal triggered by exercise, potentially reducing adaptations to training.
CaveatsGI side effects (nausea, stomach discomfort) are common, especially with meals. Sinclair avoids it when his stomach is already unsettled. The TAME trial was not structured to distinguish exercise-active versus sedentary participants.
The metformin plus exercise interaction was highlighted in a paper suggesting metformin blunts muscle hypertrophy and aerobic adaptation in older adults who exercise. Sinclair's protocol — take it on travel/sedentary days, skip it on workout days — is an n=1 attempt to capture the longevity signal while preserving exercise adaptation. Sinclair states he has also trialed rapamycin but does not take it regularly.
Mechanism
Metformin inhibits Complex I of the mitochondrial ETC, mildly lowering ATP/AMP ratio, activating AMPK, inhibiting mTORC1, and mimicking caloric restriction signaling. This activates sirtuins via rising NAD+/NADH ratio and triggers mitochondrial biogenesis as a compensatory response.
if you're exercising don't take metformin on the days we do intense exercise maybe the next day after to let your body recover and build up mitochondria... now I just take metformin when I know I'm going on a long trip and I'm not gonna exercise
Intermittent and prolonged fasting to slow the Horvath clock
WhatPeriodic fasting from one-day skips to several-day extended fasts. Sinclair describes going without food for 'a couple of days' at time of recording and mentions a week-long fast as an extreme stress test for the epigenetic clock.
WhenRegularly, with frequency calibrated to tolerate the stress without excessive muscle catabolism. All supplements including metformin and rapamycin are paused during fasts longer than one day.
DoseSinclair practices regular meal skipping; mentions contemplating a week-long fast as a longitudinal clock experiment.
For whomAll adults interested in longevity. Sinclair and Attia discuss fasting as one of the most robust interventions with evidence across species.
WhyFasting is the most potent dietary activator of sirtuins via two parallel mechanisms: rising NAD+/NADH ratio as cells burn through energy reserves, and AMPK activation from low ATP. Fasting measurably slows the Horvath methylation clock.
CaveatsExtended fasting without adequate protein can accelerate muscle catabolism. Supplements should be paused during fasts of more than one day.
Sinclair frames fasting as a 'pulse your biological stress' intervention — the adversity activates survival circuits (sirtuins, AMPK, mTOR suppression) that maintain the epigenome, but only if followed by full recovery. The metaphor he uses is that sirtuin proteins are 'first responders' — if you keep sending them on emergencies (constant DNA break repair from poor lifestyle) they cannot return to maintaining the epigenome. Fasting creates the biochemical conditions (low NAD+/NADH drain, elevated AMPK) that let sirtuins do their maintenance job rather than constantly being diverted to emergency DNA repair.
Mechanism
Caloric restriction and fasting raise the NAD+/NADH ratio by depleting NADH in the TCA cycle and electron transport chain. Rising NAD+ directly fuels SIRT1 activity. Simultaneously, AMPK is activated by elevated AMP/ATP ratio, which phosphorylates and activates SIRT1 and inhibits mTORC1.
Personal experience
Sinclair: 'right now at this moment having not eaten in a couple of days I am slowing my clock... there are probably mechanisms we know of that are turning on sirtuins so your energy levels go up when you're fasting and sirtuins do a better job of both repairing the DNA and keeping have more substrate now to do their job right'
right now at this moment having not eaten in a couple of days I am slowing my clock
Longitudinal Horvath DNA methylation clock tracking
WhatPeriodically measure epigenetic age via a DNA methylation clock test (blood or other tissue sample). Compare year-over-year to confirm whether current lifestyle interventions are decelerating or accelerating biological aging.
WhenEvery 6-12 months for longitudinal tracking. Sinclair suggests storing blood samples so past samples can be compared to future ones.
DoseSingle blood draw; DNA extracted and processed on Illumina arrays; machine-learning clock reads approximately 300 CpG sites to output biological age.
For whomAny adult serious about optimizing longevity interventions. Most valuable as a longitudinal tool — repeated measurements reveal whether aggregate interventions are working.
WhyCurrent biomarkers are too superficial to measure the underlying rate of epigenetic change. The Horvath clock reports how fast the molecular clock is actually ticking, independent of chronological age.
CaveatsClock accuracy on blood samples was approximately 95% for chronological age at time of recording. Month-to-month changes are too noisy; year-over-year comparisons are the minimum resolution. The clock cannot tell you which specific intervention caused a change.
Sinclair and Attia discuss the ideal experiment: longitudinal Horvath clock measurements before and after extended fasting, rapamycin dosing cycles, or NAD+ supplementation. Sinclair proposes on-air: baseline measurement, then extended fast (7 days), then re-measure. This would be the cleanest test of whether fasting genuinely slows the deep methylation clock or only affects upstream markers. Commercial testing companies offering methylation-age tests had already emerged at the time of recording.
If every year a person had a look at their clock and you could say hey David since I saw you last year your genetic clock sped up nine months relative to the 12 months of chronologic aging that you've undergone keep up the good work
Rapamycin pulsatile dosing — avoid concurrent with exercise
WhatRapamycin taken intermittently (not daily) to inhibit mTOR and mimic caloric restriction signaling. Avoid on days surrounding intense exercise to preserve the anabolic response.
WhenPulsatile — every few days to once weekly. Sinclair has tried it but does not take it regularly at time of recording.
DoseAttia and Sinclair do not state exact dose on-air. Standard longevity-use protocols in the literature at time ranged from 1-6 mg weekly.
For whomHealthy adults interested in lifespan extension who accept the off-label, experimental nature.
WhyRapamycin extends lifespan in mice by approximately 14% even when started at the equivalent of 60 years of human age — one of the most robust longevity results from the ITP studies. It works by inhibiting mTORC1, suppressing anabolic growth signals and activating autophagy.
CaveatsConstitutive mTOR suppression impairs muscle protein synthesis and wound healing. The pulsatile protocol is intended to preserve the longevity signal while allowing recovery of anabolic signaling between doses. Sinclair explicitly warns against taking rapamycin concurrent with heavy exercise.
Attia describes being curious whether his pulsatile rapamycin protocol shows up on the Horvath clock — whether the intermittent mTOR inhibition is actually moving the deep methylation clock or only the superficial biomarkers. The ITP study showed rapamycin extends mouse lifespan more robustly than resveratrol or NR in normal lean mice, making it the benchmark comparator for other longevity interventions.
Mechanism
Rapamycin binds FKBP12, and this complex allosterically inhibits mTORC1. Downstream effects include suppression of S6K and 4E-BP1 (reducing protein synthesis and cell growth), upregulation of autophagy via ULK1, and AMPK-mediated metabolic reprogramming that partially mimics caloric restriction.
I wouldn't take rapamycin suddenly if I was exercising because it's gonna tell the cell to hunker down and not grow and you may not even heal after exercise
What's new
Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions
6 items
Partial cellular reprogramming restores vision in three mouse models
~55 min
Sinclair's lab delivered three Yamanaka factors (OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 — omitting cancer-promoting MYC) via AAV with a doxycycline on/off switch into the eyes of mice after injury, not before. All three models — crushed optic nerve, glaucoma-like elevated intraocular pressure, and naturally aged mice — regained measurable vision.
Why this matters: First rigorous demonstration that partial reprogramming can reverse aging after damage occurs, not just prevent it — the critical distinction for clinical translation.
Background
Full Yamanaka reprogramming (all four factors: OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, MYC) creates induced pluripotent stem cells and causes tumor formation or death within days in mice. The key innovation was using only three factors to push cells younger without erasing their identity.
Sinclair's team chose the eye for practical reasons: it is immune-privileged, existing AAV-based gene therapies for eye diseases are already FDA-approved (e.g., SPARK Therapeutics' RPE65 therapy for retinal dystrophy costs in the high hundreds of thousands), and the eye tolerates viral delivery well. Two readouts confirmed vision restoration: a behavioral test (mouse tracks moving lines of decreasing thickness on a screen) and objective electrophysiological measurement of signal amplitude in the occipital cortex. Steve Horvath's methylation clock confirmed that treated cells measured younger by epigenetic age. Hundreds of genes that had drifted with aging — including olfactory receptor genes inexplicably expressed in the retina of old mice — reset toward the young pattern after reprogramming.
we've put out there actually show that in all three experiments you regenerate nerves and in the case of glaucoma and old mice they get their vision back
Also said
“we left off the fourth Yamanaka factor called Mik... Mik is a well-known oncogene that causes cancer... what was surprisingly rewarding to see was that the Mik gene was superfluous we didn't need it to reprogram cells to be partially young again”— Establishes the safety mechanism: dropping MYC allows rejuvenation without tumor risk.
“we gave it an on-off switch which is important because you don't want to become a stem cell you don't want your eye to develop a tumor”— The doxycycline-responsive system is the key engineering insight that makes the approach controllable.
The Horvath epigenetic clock predicts death with high accuracy and can be slowed by lifestyle
~1 h 12 min
Steve Horvath (UCLA) built a machine-learning clock using ~300 CpG methylation sites that predicts biological age — and death — from any tissue sample. Sinclair describes fasting as measurably slowing this clock in real time, and notes the clock accurately matched medical records of cumulative cigarette exposure better than patients' own recall.
Why this matters: Unlike telomere length (which fluctuated back to baseline within days of an astronaut's return to Earth), the Horvath clock is immutable and ticking, making it the only current tool that could let individuals track whether interventions are genuinely slowing their aging rate.
Background
Horvath used publicly available methylation data from roughly 8,000 samples, trained a machine learning model, and discovered that a small subset of ~300 sites accurately reflects biological age across all tissue types — a 'universal clock.'
The clock records every lifestyle insult: packs per day smoked matched the medical record, not the patient's self-report. By implication, the clock also records every protective behavior — fasting, exercise, calorie restriction. Commercial methylation-age testing companies had begun to emerge at the time of this episode, and Sinclair and Attia discuss using longitudinal samples to track whether interventions are working directionally even if month-to-month precision is insufficient. Sinclair notes he was fasting at the time of recording ('having not eaten in a couple of days') specifically to slow his clock.
your birth certificate just tells you when you're born this clock tells you how fast you're aging
Also said
“the clock matched what the medical record said and not what the person said... your DNA doesn't lie your clock records probably every good activity and every bad activity that you've had in your life”— Establishes the clock's ground truth fidelity — it is more reliable than self-report.
NAD+ is the essential fuel for sirtuins — but nicotinamide (the byproduct) inhibits them
~1 h 40 min
When sirtuins consume NAD+ to perform their epigenome-maintenance function, they release nicotinamide (NAM) as a byproduct. High-dose NAM is itself a potent sirtuin inhibitor. This creates a paradox: certain NAD+ precursors and doses can simultaneously raise NAD+ and accumulate enough NAM to blunt the sirtuin response.
Why this matters: Explains why high-dose niacin (vitamin B3) is a less effective NAD+ precursor than NR or NMN — the conversion pathway produces excess NAM — and why Sinclair monitors the NAD+/NAM ratio as the meaningful metric, not total NAD+ alone.
Background
Sinclair's lab published in 2002 that nicotinamide is a potent sirtuin inhibitor. The field had largely forgotten this when the NR/NMN supplementation wave began, creating a risk of counter-productive dosing.
The NR → NMN → NAD+ pathway requires two enzymatic steps inside cells. NR enters via a specific transporter; NMN adds a phosphate group; NAD+ is the final product. When a sirtuin deacetylates a target protein, it consumes one NAD+ and releases NAM plus O-acetyl-ADP-ribose. If you simultaneously boost NAD+ precursors and accumulate NAM, you push the gas and the brake at the same time. A 2019 Princeton study (Rabinowitz lab) found that oral NR was largely captured by the liver, with minimal NR leaving hepatocytes — though a separate study at 1,000 mg/day showed intramuscular NAD+ also rose, suggesting dose-dependent spillover past hepatic first pass.
nicotinamide we showed back in 2002 is a really effective inhibitor of the sirtuins which are enzymes that you want to keep on it's the whole point of raising an ad and so we try to avoid nicotinamide while raising an ad
Senescent cells poison healthy neighbors — epigenomic noise is the upstream cause
~1 h 20 min
Sinclair describes cellular senescence not as an end state but as a consequence of prior epigenomic noise: cells that lose their identity through sirtuin redistribution eventually exit the cell cycle as 'zombie cells.' These senescent cells then secrete inflammatory signals (SASP) that accelerate epigenomic corruption in surrounding cells.
Why this matters: Unifies the two dominant aging paradigms — epigenetic drift and senescence — into a single causal sequence: noise → identity loss → senescence → bystander acceleration. Jim Kirkland (Mayo Clinic) showed that injecting a small amount of senescent cells into young mice rapidly produced hallmarks of premature aging including elevated blood sugar.
Background
The beta-galactosidase blue stain for senescent cells shows that fat from middle-aged animals is pale blue; fat from 50-year-olds is dark blue — packed with senescent cells signaling emergency to the entire body.
Kirkland's experiment: a tiny dab of senescent cells implanted into the peritoneal cavity of young mice caused premature aging across the whole organism — higher blood sugar and multiple signs of systemic aging. This demonstrates that senescent burden is not a passive marker but an active driver. The question of whether partial reprogramming can rescue a cell that has already clicked into senescence (versus one that is merely identity-confused but not yet zombie) remains open. Sinclair's guess: pre-senescent identity loss is likely reversible; fully committed senescence may require a different approach (senolytics like dasatinib + quercetin).
they don't just sit there they're actually sort of poisoning the well they're in a state of stress and they're saying to these cells around them oh my god I'm panic you guys should be panic too so they send out chemicals and proteins that stress the other cells
Resveratrol activates SIRT1 by acting as an allosteric cofactor — confirmed by Sinclair's 10-year mutation experiment
~2 h
A decade-long controversy over whether resveratrol directly activates SIRT1 or works through an artifact was resolved in Sinclair's lab by engineering a single amino-acid mutation that makes the SIRT1 enzyme immune to resveratrol. In high-fat-diet mice, the mutation fully blocked the benefits of resveratrol — confirming SIRT1 activation as the mechanism.
Why this matters: Definitively settles the resveratrol mechanism debate and validates the entire sirtuin-activator drug-development program. It also means that resveratrol's benefits depend on having a functional SIRT1 — consistent with the finding that benefits are largest in metabolically stressed animals where sirtuins are most needed.
Background
Sinclair's group published in 2003 that resveratrol activates Sir2/SIRT1. A 2009 paper challenged this as an in-vitro artifact. The mutation-knockin mouse was the definitive in-vivo test.
Resveratrol acts like a 'molecular glue' between SIRT1 and a specific motif on its substrate protein — the enzyme undergoes a conformational bend at an 'elbow' region. The mutation creates a stiff elbow that prevents this bending, eliminating resveratrol sensitivity without otherwise disrupting enzyme function. Both resveratrol and the more potent synthetic STACs (sirtuin-activating compounds) like SRT2104 were blocked by the same mutation, confirming a shared binding site. The ITP study (independent life-testing consortium) found that resveratrol did not extend lifespan in healthy lean mice — consistent with the hypothesis that sirtuins must already be overtaxed (as in obese or aged animals) for NAD+/resveratrol restoration to matter.
resveratrol extends lifespan by activating syrup one... that wasn't like a candidate question I wasn't even asking that rhetorically
Fasting and exercise activate sirtuins by raising NAD+ — the stress-pulsing principle
~1 h 30 min
Sinclair frames calorie restriction, fasting, and exercise as 'NAD+ elevators' that work by activating the body's survival circuitry. The unifying principle: stress the system in pulses, allow full recovery, repeat. Constant suppression (constitutive rapamycin, constant low-grade restriction) loses the recovery phase and blunts adaptation.
Why this matters: Provides the mechanism linking lifestyle interventions to the same epigenetic-clock-slowing biology as pharmaceutical NAD+ precursors and SIRT1 activators — they are all triggering the same ancient survival program.
Background
Yeast Sir2 (the ancestor of human SIRT1) was first discovered to extend lifespan by ~30% when upregulated or when dietary restriction was applied. The connection between fasting-induced NAD+ rise and sirtuin activation was established in multiple model organisms.
Sinclair describes this at the time of recording: he is fasting ('having not eaten in a couple of days') explicitly to activate his sirtuins. His framing of metformin timing follows the same logic — avoid it on heavy exercise days so as not to suppress the mitochondrial biogenesis signal. The principle generalizes to rapamycin: 'I wouldn't take rapamycin suddenly if I was exercising because it's gonna tell the cell to hunker down and not grow and you may not even heal after exercise.' The optimal protocol is alternating stress (fasting, heavy exercise, cold exposure) with full recovery rather than chronic mild suppression.
pulse your biological stress put your body in a state of anxiety or fear adversity but you don't want to do it all the time your body needs to chance to recover if you want to take a supplement maybe don't take it every day
Recommendations
Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode
3 items
Resveratrol — 1 gram per day with fat
Supplement
Sinclair's longest-running personal supplement, taken at 1 gram/day in the morning with a fat-containing food (yogurt he makes at home). Described as 'the longest experiment I've ever done.'
At time of recording, resveratrol supplements were widely available. The 1g dose is 10x the typical 100 mg capsule and roughly 1,000x a glass of red wine. Sinclair notes he is not recommending others take it but simply reporting what he does. He acknowledges the ITP negative finding in lean mice while maintaining the mechanistic case for its value in metabolically stressed individuals and as part of a broader sirtuin-activation stack.
vs alternatives
Pterostilbene (sold as the 'superior' alternative) has two methyl groups where resveratrol has hydroxyl groups, which in theory improves oral bioavailability, but Sinclair states there is no robust in-vivo data showing it is more potent than resveratrol. NR/NMN address a different part of the sirtuin pathway (the fuel, not the accelerator) and are complementary rather than competing.
I continue to take was very tall because it's cheap its harmless as far as we know but the evidence keeps stacking up that long-term is beneficial
Discussed as the primary oral NAD+ boosting strategy. NR is available on Amazon; NMN is Sinclair's personal preference (lab is testing NMN). A clinical study using 1,000 mg/day of NR showed NAD+ rose in both blood and muscle.
Sinclair's lab is developing novel pro-drugs of NAD+ boosters with a team of chemists over 5-6 years — the most advanced molecule was in Phase 1 at Brigham and Women's Hospital at time of recording. The goal is better gut absorption, microbiome resistance, and mitochondrial targeting versus NR or NMN. Key point: the NAD+/NAM ratio matters more than total NAD+, and high-dose niacin (plain vitamin B3) is inferior because the conversion pathway produces more free NAM.
vs alternatives
IV NAD+ is discussed skeptically — the molecule is too large to enter most cells directly and must be broken down and reconstructed inside cells. Niacin raises NAD+ but also produces the sirtuin-inhibiting byproduct nicotinamide. NR and NMN are preferred because they convert to NAD+ with less NAM accumulation.
the idea is that by either replacing lost nad or boosting it to levels that you would only get if you run marathons constantly you can turn on these sirtuin defenses
Longitudinal biological age tracking via periodic blood draws and methylation array analysis. Predicts time-to-death more accurately than telomere length, matches smoking history better than self-report, and changes measurably with lifestyle interventions over months to years.
Attia proposes a specific design on-air: collect baseline blood, do a week-long water fast, re-measure clock — the cleanest test of whether fasting genuinely moves the deep methylation clock. Both agree the field needs longitudinal trials testing specific interventions (fasting regimens, rapamycin dosing schedules, NMN dose-response) against the Horvath clock as the primary endpoint.
could you imagine we love our rings and our CGMs and all of these things but imagine you had a little horvath clock you could stick into your interstitial fluid it's coming
Lifespan: Why We Age — and Why We Don't Have To by David Sinclair
Book Sponsored · disclosed
Sinclair's first book for a general audience, covering the information theory of aging, sirtuins, NAD+, epigenetic reprogramming, and the societal implications of radical life extension. Attia coordinated the episode release with the book launch.
DisclosureGuest's own book, released the day after this episode dropped (September 10, 2019). Primary reason for Sinclair's return appearance.
Sinclair describes writing sections of the book while lab results were coming in — readers experience the discoveries as they happened. The book covers ground Attia deliberately chose not to re-hash in this episode: societal ethics of life extension, economics of aging, what a world with 200-year lifespans might look like. Sinclair personally drew all the illustrations in the book — realistic portraits of 28 people in 28 days, rendered digitally from reference images he modified to ensure original artwork ownership.
I recommend you buy the book I really enjoyed it and that's saying something because I don't really learn a lot reading books about aging unfortunately anymore the books are written at such a low level that that's not the case here this is really good
Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased
7 items
if you restored the methylation status to what it looked like when you were born you'd have a younger phenotype — that's exactly what I'm saying
Sinclair's clearest statement of the information theory of aging thesis — and the most direct formulation of what epigenetic reprogramming is designed to achieve.
right now at this moment having not eaten in a couple of days I am slowing my clock
Sinclair stating verbatim that he fasts as a first-person experiment to decelerate his Horvath clock — makes the intervention concrete and personal.
the molecule I take a gram of resveratrol in the morning it's high dose it seemed to be fine
Verbatim dose statement from Sinclair's personal protocol — the exact figure listeners asked about most.
nicotinamide we showed back in 2002 is a really effective inhibitor of the sirtuins which are enzymes that you want to keep on it's the whole point of raising an ad and so we try to avoid nicotinamide while raising an ad
The key mechanistic warning that high-dose niacin or accumulating NAM from rapid NAD+ cycling can paradoxically blunt sirtuin activity — critical context for anyone interpreting NAD+ supplementation studies.
pulse your biological stress put your body in a state of anxiety or fear adversity but you don't want to do it all the time your body needs to chance to recover
Sinclair's core protocol philosophy — applies to fasting, exercise, metformin timing, and rapamycin simultaneously.
we've put out there actually show that in all three experiments you regenerate nerves and in the case of glaucoma and old mice they get their vision back
The headline result of the reprogramming paper — vision restored in three independent mouse models after the damage was already present, not prevented.
there seems to be something in cells that tells them these methyl groups the program that was laid down when you're a baby is still there and cells can access that somehow to say all these other things that have happened since you're born or since you're a teenager that's just noise that's crap ignore that
Sinclair's explanation of why partial reprogramming works — the epigenetic 'backup copy' persists in every cell and can be accessed to restore youthful gene expression.
Sign in to share feedback
Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.
Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.
Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.