Polarized training for perimenopausal women
Sims frames the 150-minute moderate guideline as harmful for women in perimenopause because it lacks the necessary stimulus to produce adaptation but still increases cortisol. She explains that the shift in estrogen/progesterone ratios leads to diminished receptor sensitivity, gut changes, and a cascade of symptoms (brain fog, vasomotor symptoms, bone loss, lean mass loss). To counteract this, the body needs a stress that triggers adaptations—much like how the hormones used to help. Polarized training, with its super high-intensity efforts, creates such stress. She doesn't provide exact session lengths or frequencies in this excerpt, leaving it as a general recomposition of a woman's weekly exercise pattern. The concept is directly contrasted with the 'abysmal' 150-minute guideline based on 20-year-old science.
With perimenopause, estrogen and progesterone receptor sensitivity declines, and the gut microbiome shifts, leading to insulin resistance and loss of lean mass. High-intensity intervals create metabolic stress that drives adaptations in muscle mitochondria and insulin signaling, compensating for the lost hormonal support. They also promote epigenetic modifications in muscle that reduce reliance on insulin. In contrast, moderate-intensity exercise raises cortisol without triggering these robust adaptations, and because perimenopausal women already have elevated baseline cortisol and sympathetic drive, it worsens body composition instead of improving it.
This is where we look at the polarized training effect. So we want to do super highintensity work for metabolic control and creating some longerterm epigenetic changes within the muscle so that we aren't necessarily reliant so much on insulin especially as we start to become more insulin resistant.

