UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Dr. Stacy Sims: “Your Wearable Is Lying To You!” How To Train With Your Cycle
~9 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Dr. Stacy Sims: “Your Wearable Is Lying To You!” How To Train With Your Cycle

Stacy Sims
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Wearable recovery algorithms (like Whoop and Oura) are built on male physiology, misreading women's HRV — especially around menstruation and ovulation — and can produce misleading red scores that don't reflect actual capacity to perform.

2

Women should track their own cycle and daily sensations to identify high-energy days for hard training and low-energy days for active recovery, rather than following a rigid phase-based training plan.

3

Sims bans her athletes from wearing recovery wearables the week before a competition because the psychological hit from a low score can undermine performance even when the body is ready.

4

In the 4–5 days before a period, wearables almost never show a green recovery score due to hormonal shifts, but this does not mean you can't train or compete; ignore the score and trust how you feel.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

4 items

Individual Cycle Tracking for Training and Life Scheduling

WhatTrack your menstrual cycle length, daily sleep quality, and subjective feelings for several months until clear patterns emerge, then schedule your hardest training and demanding tasks on your personal high-energy days, and prioritize recovery and parasympathetic activities on your low-energy days.
WhenThroughout the entire menstrual cycle, starting from day 1 of bleeding; check feelings and sleep daily.
For whomAll menstruating women, especially those who want to optimize performance without rigid phase-based prescriptions.
WhyTo align training stress with periods of naturally high stress resilience, maximising fitness gains while avoiding overreaching on days when the body is less capable of absorbing and recovering from intense loads.
CaveatsIf your cycle is consistently longer than 40 days, Sims recommends getting checked out medically. Normal variation of a couple of days per cycle is fine.

Sims argues that the lack of robust, individualised studies means blanket cycle-phase training advice is often too complex and not useful for most women. Instead, she proposes a self-experimentation approach: each woman should track her own data (cycle length, sleep, perceived energy) and then backwards-engineer her best and worst days. On high-energy days, you want to impose a significant training stress because your body is able to handle and supercompensate from it — this is the core mechanism of getting fitter. On days when you feel flat, trying to push hard can tip you into an under-recovered state, which compounds with normal life stress and can degrade resilience across the board. The protocol is as much about life management (hard meetings, work from home) as about exercise.

Mechanism

The principle relies on the concept of allostatic load: the body has a finite capacity to handle stress (physical, mental, emotional). During certain phases of the cycle, oestrogen and other factors enhance resilience and recovery capability, making the organism more 'stress-absorbent'. By matching high stress to high capacity, you stay within the adaptive zone. On low-resilience days, adding high-intensity exercise can push total load beyond what you can recover from, leading to overreaching and potential performance decline.

I want you to see how you sleep, how you feel, and you'll start to find patterns in your own menstrual cycle, … maybe on day 21, you feel really flat. you're like, h, I'm going to hide and work from home that day and I'm going to go for some outside nature time to really help with parasympathetic and recovery.

Also said
“the idea of getting fitter is how much stress you can put on the body and recover from it.”— Underpins the entire why — fitness comes from stress + recovery, so timing stress matters.
“We want to go hard when our body can is capable of being stress resilient and absorbing that and recovering from it. And then we don't want to push so much when we are already at that level of I'm not quite so stress resilient. I don't want to push myself into an overreached or underrecovered state because then we have ramifications forward that can really exacerbate all my normal life stress resilience as well.”— Links cycle phase not just to training but to global stress resilience, a broader framing.

Ignore Daily Wearable Recovery Scores; Use Monthly Trends

WhatInstead of reacting to a single day's red, yellow, or green recovery score, look at long-term trends in heart rate variability (HRV) and resting heart rate across your menstrual cycle to assess whether you are truly adapting to training.
WhenThroughout the cycle, especially during the luteal phase and pre-menstrual days when algorithm accuracy drops.
For whomWomen in reproductive years and perimenopause using wearables like Whoop or Oura.
WhyBecause wearable algorithms are built on male physiology, they misinterpret progesterone-driven HRV changes and female beat-to-beat differences as poor recovery, creating false red scores that don't reflect whole-body readiness.
CaveatsIn perimenopause, hormonal volatility can cause a precipitous drop in HRV that algorithms can't handle, making even trend interpretation shaky. Always ground decisions in how you actually feel.

Sims details that after ovulation, progesterone raises resting heart rate and respiratory rate; the wearable reads this as a drop in HRV and labels you unrecovered, but the effect is isolated to one vagal nerve — muscles and brain may be fully ready. The 4–5 days before menstruation are particularly problematic: hormonal flux and inflammation prevent a green score regardless of actual recovery. She therefore instructs women to step back and ask 'How do I really feel?' rather than letting the device dictate their day. By plotting HRV across an entire month, you can see whether your baseline is improving (adaptation) or declining (overtraining) — a far more valuable signal than the daily colour.

Mechanism

Progesterone acts on the vagus nerve to increase resting heart rate and respiratory rate, which mathematically reduces HRV as measured by time-domain algorithms. This is a localized autonomic effect, not a systemic indicator of sympathetic dominance or fatigue. Additionally, women's intrinsic cardiac rhythm differs from men's, causing the algorithms to flag it as an arrhythmia, further degrading the accuracy of recovery metrics.

Personal experience

Sims mentioned she prohibits her athletes from using wearables in the week before a major event because she's observed them internalising a poor score and then underperforming, confirming that the psychological impact is real even when the physiology isn't.

When you're looking at your wearable, you want to look at trends over time and see what your heart rate variability is doing across the month because then you can see are you actually adapting to the training or not.

Also said
“I think a lot of people look at their wearable and go, 'Oh my gosh, I'm in the red. I can't do this today.' It's like, 'No, let's take a step back. How do you actually feel? Let's see.'”— Highlights the dangerous behavioural consequence of trusting the daily score.

Wearable Blackout Week Before Competition

WhatRemove your recovery wearable (Whoop, Oura, etc.) in the seven days leading up to a major competitive event to prevent psychological sabotage from an artificially low recovery score.
WhenThe week before any important race, game, or performance.
Dose7 days pre-competition
For whomFemale athletes who rely on wearables for recovery tracking and are susceptible to suggestion.
WhyThe algorithms are especially inaccurate in the pre-menstrual days and can show red when the body is fully capable; seeing that can create a nocebo effect that reduces actual performance.
CaveatsThis is a psychological protocol; if you can genuinely ignore the score, it may not be necessary, but Sims' experience suggests most athletes cannot.

Sims shared that she has had enough conversations with athletes who saw a red recovery score and then mentally checked out before they even started, leading to poorer outcomes. Because there is no day in the cycle when a woman cannot perform, the wearable's red flag is misleading. By removing the device, the athlete is forced to rely on internal cues and preparation, which is both more accurate and less damaging. This advice runs counter to the quantified-self movement and is a strong example of 'data is not always helpful'.

Personal experience

Sims stated directly: 'one of the things that I do not let my athletes do is use a wearable in the week leading up to a major event.' This is a hard rule in her coaching practice.

I do not let my athletes do is use a wearable in the week leading up to a major event because psychologically they will look at what the whoop or the aura is saying and take it on and go, 'Oh, I'm not recovered enough. I'm not going to perform well.' When actually it's not really a representation of what it what's going on with their body.

Luteal Phase Fueling and Training Adjustment (if Ovulation is Pinpointed)

WhatIf you can accurately detect ovulation via technology, increase your carbohydrate and protein intake and shift your training emphasis toward steady-state work rather than high-intensity efforts during the luteal phase (post-ovulation).
WhenFrom ovulation until the start of menstruation, for those who have pinpointed ovulation.
For whomWomen with access to reliable ovulation-tracking technology (e.g., continuous temperature monitors or hormone tests) who want to micro-optimise.
WhyProgesterone alters metabolism, increasing reliance on carbohydrates and protein, and high-intensity training may be harder to recover from, so a shift to steady-state can be beneficial.
CaveatsSims calls this approach 'really complex and complicated' and suggests that for most women, the self-tracking and feel-based approach is more practical.

Sims acknowledged that if you have the technology to know exactly when you've ovulated, you can tap into molecular-level insights: progesterone's arrival signals a metabolic shift that reduces glycogen efficiency and increases protein turnover, meaning you need more fuel and building blocks. Similarly, because high-intensity work is more glycolytic and produces more metabolic stress, leaning into steady-state can prevent overreaching. However, she quickly pivots to stressing that this level of granularity is not necessary for most women and that individual pattern tracking is far more accessible and robust.

Mechanism

Progesterone blunts insulin sensitivity and increases amino acid oxidation, making carbohydrate and protein timing more critical. It also raises core temperature and respiratory demand, which can make high-intensity exercise feel harder and take longer to recover from.

If you are using some of the new technology and you can actually pinpoint when you're ovulating, then you can look at some of the molecular aspects and say, 'Okay, well, I've ovulated. I know progesterone is coming into play. I need more carbohydrate. I need more protein. Um, I'm going to sort of adjust depending on how I feel. I probably should try to do more steady state rather than high intensity.'

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

2 items

Wearable HRV algorithms are male-biased and mislead women

Stacy Sims argues that almost all wearable algorithms are written through a male physiological lens, incorrectly interpreting women's naturally different beat-to-beat heart rhythm and progesterone-driven HRV changes as signs of poor recovery.

Why this matters: She directly challenges the mainstream trust in daily recovery scores for women, saying they can create harmful nocebo effects and misrepresent whole-body readiness.

Background

Wearables like Whoop and Oura have become popular for tracking recovery via HRV, resting heart rate, and sleep. However, their algorithms were primarily developed using male data, ignoring key sex differences in autonomic regulation.

Sims explains that women exhibit a different intrinsic beat-to-beat rhythm that gets flagged as an anomaly. More critically, after ovulation, rising progesterone increases resting heart rate and respiratory rate, which the algorithms read as a drop in HRV and hence a red recovery score. But according to Sims, this vagal effect is isolated — muscles and brain may be fully recovered. In the 4–5 days before menstruation, when progesterone plummets and inflammation rises, the algorithms almost never allow a green score, yet performance capacity is not compromised. She says the psychological impact of seeing red can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, especially before competition. Therefore, she advises women to treat wearables as a trend tool over the full cycle, not as a daily verdict.

Personal experience

Sims shared that she forbids her own athletes from using wearables in the week before major events because she's seen them internalize a low recovery score and then underperform, even when their bodies were ready.

The algorithms again are primarily written through almost all algorithms on wearables are written through the male lens.

Also said
“Progesterone alters what we call our vagal tone or vagal responses. So we have an increase in our resting heart rate. We have an increase in our resting respiratory rate which is then read as a decrease in a heart rate variability. But that doesn't necessarily represent the entire body system. Like our muscles might not be affected, our brain might not be affected. It's just progesterone's effect on one vagal nerve.”— Provides the biological mechanism for why a low HRV score can be a false alarm.
“For women, we know in about four to five days before their period starts, you cannot get into the green with the algorithms that are on the wearables because there's such a strong hormonal response of what's happening with progesterone had peaked and now your hormones are starting to drop. There's greater inflammation and it's changing all the systems in the body. That doesn't necessarily mean you can't perform because there isn't a day on any part of the menstrual cycle where you can't perform.”— Clarifies that even during the premenstrual window, performance is still possible despite what the wearable suggests.

Cycle-based training should be self-experimented, not prescriptive

Rather than following a generic menstrual-phase training plan, Sims advocates for women to track their own cycle length, sleep, and daily feelings to identify individual high-energy and low-energy days and schedule hard efforts and recovery accordingly.

Why this matters: This shifts the paradigm from 'train according to your phase' to 'learn your own patterns and exploit your good days for fitness gains while protecting yourself on flat days' — a more personalised and resilience-focused approach.

Background

Many online programs now prescribe training intensities based on cycle phases (follicular = high intensity, luteal = lower intensity, etc.), but Sims says robust studies are lacking and individual variation is huge.

Sims notes that day 1 is the first day of bleeding; cycle length can vary and is normal up to a few days fluctuation. She recommends women track how they sleep and feel across the cycle, because after a few months patterns emerge. For example, many women feel fantastic around day 12 and flat around day 21. On the fantastic days, she says to book hard meetings and train with high intensity to get a training stress that the body can absorb and recover from, driving fitness. On flat days, the advice is to work from home, spend time in nature, and prioritize parasympathetic recovery to avoid pushing into an overreached or under-recovered state, which can then harm overall stress resilience. The key insight: go hard when you are stress-resilient, back off when you aren't, to prevent compounding life stress and under-recovery.

I want you to see how you sleep, how you feel, and you'll start to find patterns in your own menstrual cycle, ... and then you can pick out, you know what, on day 12, I always feel fantastic. I'm going to book my hardest meetings on that day, and I'm going to go train in the gym really hard so I can get that training stress because the idea of getting fitter is how much stress you can put on the body and recover from it.

Also said
“We want to go hard when our body can is capable of being stress resilient and absorbing that and recovering from it. And then we don't want to push so much when we are already at that level of I'm not quite so stress resilient.”— Reinforces the rationale of stress-matching that replaces phase-based generalisations.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

2 items

Oura Ring

Product

When comparing the two major wearables, Sims noted that Oura was originally designed for sleep tracking and now retrofits physical activity, but has a 'bigger vision to be able to tag women's health into it', whereas Whoop remains focused on high performance. She presents this as a reason women might prefer Oura for health tracking, though both are still tools with limitations.

Sims walked through the design philosophies: Whoop was built for the performance athlete, so integrating women's health features is a retroactive effort; Oura started from a sleep paradigm and now adds activity features. For women specifically looking for cycle-aware insights, Oura's roadmap appears more aligned with that goal, but she stops short of a blanket endorsement, emphasising that any wearable should be used as only one data point in the toolbox, not as a daily directive.

vs alternatives

Compared to Whoop, Oura is seen as having a stronger current and future focus on female-specific health metrics, though both suffer from the same male-biased HRV algorithm problem. Whoop still excels for dedicated performance athletes who want strain and recovery data, but Sims' tone suggests Oura is more women-friendly in its evolution.

When you're looking at the outcomes that are coming, we see Aura has a bigger vision to be able to tag women's health into it where Whoop has the vision of high performance still.

Also said
“Someone posted on LinkedIn a couple of weeks ago about how Whoop was designed with the performance athlete in mind. So trying to now retrospectively fit a lot of the stuff that women want into it. Aura was designed with sleep in mind. And so now they are retrofitting physical activity.”— Explains the origin story that underpins the different trajectories of the two companies.
Find Oura

Ignore your wearable's recovery score in the 4–5 days before your period

Practice

Sims says that in the 4–5 days pre-menstruation, wearables almost never give a green score because of the hormonal crash and inflammation, but this does not reflect performance capability. She advises women to deliberately disregard the colour or number during that window and trust their own sensation of readiness.

The late luteal phase is characterised by a sharp drop in progesterone and oestrogen, triggering systemic inflammation and altered autonomic function. The wearable's algorithm interprets this as a red recovery state. Sims' core message is 'there isn't a day on any part of the menstrual cycle where you can't perform', so women should not let a device convince them otherwise. By consciously ignoring the score, they can avoid the nocebo effect and still execute their planned training or competition.

For women, we know in about four to five days before their period starts, you cannot get into the green with the algorithms that are on the wearables because there's such a strong hormonal response … That doesn't necessarily mean you can't perform because there isn't a day on any part of the menstrual cycle where you can't perform.

Find Ignore

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

5 items
The algorithms again are primarily written through almost all algorithms on wearables are written through the male lens.
A succinct, provocative indictment of the entire wearable industry's oversight of female physiology.
I do not let my athletes use a wearable in the week leading up to a major event because psychologically they will look at what the whoop or the aura is saying and take it on and go, 'Oh, I'm not recovered enough. I'm not going to perform well.' When actually it's not really a representation of what it what's going on with their body.
A hard, counter-cultural coaching rule that flips the narrative on data-driven performance.
Progesterone alters what we call our vagal tone or vagal responses. So we have an increase in our resting heart rate. We have an increase in our resting respiratory rate which is then read as a decrease in a heart rate variability. But that doesn't necessarily represent the entire body system. Like our muscles might not be affected, our brain might not be affected. It's just progesterone's effect on one vagal nerve.
Clearly explains the specific biological mechanism that breaks wearable HRV interpretation for women.
For women, we know in about four to five days before their period starts, you cannot get into the green with the algorithms that are on the wearables because there's such a strong hormonal response … That doesn't necessarily mean you can't perform because there isn't a day on any part of the menstrual cycle where you can't perform.
Directly empowers women to reject a low recovery score and trust their own capacity.
We want to go hard when our body can is capable of being stress resilient and absorbing that and recovering from it. And then we don't want to push so much when we are already at that level of I'm not quite so stress resilient.
A memorable, actionable summary of the whole cycle-based training philosophy.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

menstrual-cycle-trainingwearables-accuracy-womenheart-rate-variability-gender-biaswhoop-vs-ourapre-competition-psychologyovulation-fueling-strategycycle-tracking-self-experimentationprogesterone-hrv-algorithmsperimenopause-wearables
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.