UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Should Women in Menopause Still Do Zone 2? Cardio Choices For Metabolism and Insulin Control
~6 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Should Women in Menopause Still Do Zone 2? Cardio Choices For Metabolism and Insulin Control

Stacy Sims
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Stacy Sims argues that menopausal women do not need high volumes of Zone 2 cardio for metabolic benefits; instead, they must prioritize high-intensity work to replace the metabolic signaling once provided by estrogen and progesterone.

2

True sprint interval training (30-second all-out efforts on an assault bike) epigenetically increases GLUT4 protein gates, enabling insulin-independent glucose uptake and better insulin control within 3–4 weeks.

3

High-intensity interval training (1–4 minute intervals at 80–90% effort) boosts mitochondrial capacity to oxidize free fatty acids, reducing the liver’s conversion of them into visceral fat.

4

Sims recommends combining SIT and HIIT as part of a polarized training plan, while reserving long, slow Zone 2 as 'soul food' for mental well-being rather than a primary body composition strategy.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

2 items

Sprint Interval Training (SIT) on an Assault Bike

WhatPerform 30-second all-out sprints on an assault bike (full-body arm and leg engagement) with 3–4 minutes of easy recovery, repeating for 2–8 rounds.
When2–3 times per week, on non-consecutive days, as part of a polarized training plan.
Dose30 seconds maximal work, 3–4 minutes passive or light recovery, starting with 2 repeats and gradually building to 3–5 (with 8 as a potential ceiling); perform for at least 3–4 weeks to see initial metabolic adaptations.
For whomPost-menopausal or perimenopausal women who want better insulin control, reduced abdominal fat, and improved body composition, and who are cleared for high-intensity exercise.
WhyEpigenetically upregulates GLUT4 transporters to improve insulin-independent glucose disposal, dramatically enhancing insulin sensitivity and carbohydrate handling.
CaveatsExtremely intense; most untrained individuals can complete only 2 rounds before exhaustion. Should be approached with a proper warm-up and may be contraindicated for those with uncontrolled hypertension or cardiovascular disease without medical clearance.

Sims insists that sprint interval training is the antidote to the cultural message that women should avoid very high intensity exercise. She frames SIT as a necessary external stress that replaces the metabolic role of lost estrogen and progesterone, because it forces the body to create new feedback pathways. The assault bike is highlighted as ideal because it engages both arms and legs against air resistance, demanding total-body maximal output and allowing the user to track meters as a motivational tool. She describes a common gym scenario: people claim they can do 5–8 rounds, but after the second all-out sprint they are completely spent. This reality check is itself a teaching point—true SIT is unsustainable beyond a few repeats. The recovery period of 3–4 minutes is critical to allow phosphocreatine replenishment and to reset neural drive; otherwise the subsequent efforts become submaximal and lose the unique GLUT4 stimulus. The adaptation period of 3–4 weeks aligns with the time it takes for epigenetic changes to manifest at the protein level, offering a clear expectation for women to track progress.

Mechanism

The 30-second maximal effort creates a profound metabolic stress that signals the muscle nucleus to express more GLUT4 proteins. These glucose transporter proteins then migrate to the cell membrane, creating gates that pull carbohydrate into the muscle cell without requiring insulin. Over 3–4 weeks, this epigenetic remodeling increases the total pool of GLUT4 and the efficiency of translocation, lowering fasting insulin and improving postprandial glucose handling. The response is systemic, not just local to the working muscle, and directly counteracts the insulin resistance that worsens after menopause.

The best way I can teach someone to do that is on an assault bike where you're looking at arms and legs against resistance. Like everyone hates the assault bike, but 30 seconds, you're blasting.

Also said
“I make people chase meters. I'm like, 'How hard can you go for 30 seconds?' And you can have a couple of friends around. Go, go, go, go, go. And you see, and then the next one, which is three or four minutes later, because you want three to four minutes recoveries, you're chasing the meters to try to push a little bit harder.”— Details the practical coaching tactic and exact rest intervals for reproducibility.
“Most people are like, 'Oh, I can do three to five or eight of those.' It's like, 'Oh, we'll see.' Cuz usually it's like two and they're like, 'I'm done.' Because it's hard.”— Sets a realistic expectation about volume and difficulty, preventing undertraining.

High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) for Mitochondrial Health and Visceral Fat Reduction

WhatIntervals of 1–4 minutes at 80–90% of maximum effort, interspersed with variable recovery periods, repeated for a total session of approximately 20–30 minutes.
When1–2 times per week on separate days from SIT, as part of a polarized training regimen.
Dose1–4 minutes per work interval, recovery period as needed to allow the next interval to be completed at the target intensity; overall session length not specified but typically 20–30 minutes.
For whomMenopausal or perimenopausal women aiming to reduce visceral fat, improve metabolic flexibility, and support body composition goals.
WhyIncreases mitochondrial capacity to oxidize both carbohydrates and free fatty acids, reducing circulating free fatty acid levels and thereby limiting their uptake by the liver and storage as visceral adipose tissue.
CaveatsStill a demanding modality; should be built up to after establishing a base of fitness. Not a replacement for SIT but a complementary stimulus.

Sims distinguishes HIIT from SIT by intensity and duration: HIIT sits at the 80–90% effort level and lasts 1–4 minutes, making it more sustainable than all-out sprints. She describes it as the next tier down, targeting mitochondrial biogenesis rather than the immediate GLUT4 epigenetic switch. This type of training is critical for women whose hormonal shift has increased their propensity to store fat viscerally. By enhancing the muscle’s ability to burn fat for energy, HIIT creates a metabolic environment where free fatty acids are cleared more efficiently. Sims stresses that the combination of SIT (insulin control) and HIIT (mitochondrial fat oxidation) is what delivers comprehensive metabolic health and body composition changes. Without HIIT, the visceral fat component may remain unaddressed. She also notes that this training must be sufficiently hard—‘above and beyond’ what the body is accustomed to—in order to elicit adaptation, because the former hormonal assist is no longer present.

Mechanism

HIIT stresses the aerobic and anaerobic systems simultaneously. The intense but sustained effort forces mitochondria to upregulate enzymes involved in fatty acid transport and oxidation. As mitochondrial capacity increases, a greater proportion of circulating free fatty acids are used for fuel during exercise and at rest, rather than remaining in the bloodstream. This drop in circulating free fatty acids deprives the liver of substrate to synthesize triglycerides, which are then packaged and deposited as visceral fat—a key driver of central obesity in menopause. The net effect is a reduction in visceral fat accumulation and an improvement in overall lipid profile.

When we look at high intensity interval training which is just a step down from the intensity where the intervals are one to four minutes at 80 to 90% with variable recovery. This is more of a mitochondrial response where we're looking at increasing the capacity of the mitochondria to use carbohydrate and use free fatty acids to reduce those free fatty acids that are circulating that get wrapped up by the liver and stored as vicerial fat.

Also said
“So this is how we're reducing conversation of the vicerial fat in the body.”— Explicitly states the outcome of HIIT on visceral fat reduction.
“The combination of the two is really really important for metabolic health and body comp.”— Reinforces that both SIT and HIIT are necessary, not optional.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

2 items

zone-2-is-not-optimal-for-menopausal-women

Stacy Sims pushes back against the popular Zone 2 cardio rhetoric, asserting that women—especially menopausal—do not need large volumes of Zone 2 to achieve the purported mitochondrial and fatty-acid utilization benefits, and that high-intensity work is essential for metabolic health and body composition.

Why this matters: Challenges the prevailing unisex Zone 2 advice popularized by male-centric physiology studies, offering a sex-specific perspective that prioritizes sprint and high-intensity work over steady-state cardio for this population.

Background

Zone 2 training—defined as moderate-intensity steady-state exercise—has been widely recommended in longevity, athletic, and health circles for improving mitochondrial efficiency and insulin sensitivity. Many women in menopause have adopted it as a primary cardio modality, often under the assumption that it is universally beneficial.

Sims immediately counters the 'zone 2 rhetoric' when asked about cardio for menopausal women. She explains that female physiology differs: women don't require a large volume of Zone 2 to upregulate free fatty acid use or mitochondrial function. Instead, she frames Zone 2 as 'soul food'—pleasurable, mentally restorative, but not sufficient as a training stimulus for the 50-year-old body. She emphasizes that women trying to lose abdominal adiposity, improve insulin control, and change body composition cannot rely on long slow work alone. This is because the hard exercise stress that once came from estrogen, progesterone, and to some extent testosterone is now missing; external high-intensity stress must replace it to create new feedback pathways. She also cautions against prescribing multi-hour endurance rides to women who haven't been doing them, calling it 'contraindicated to what we want for the body.' Throughout, she draws on her own endurance background as both a participant and researcher, making her critique rooted in lived experience, not just theory.

Personal experience

Sims shares that she comes from an endurance background (Ironman, Xterra) and loves going out for long rides: 'I get a bike, I go out, I go out for hours, I love it. That's my soul food. I get lost. I come back and feel fantastic.' However, she acknowledges that this feeling does not make it optimal training for her post-menopausal body, and she does not recommend that others adopt it for physique or metabolic goals.

I tell women zone 2 is your soul food. ... But that's not optimal for this 50-year-old body, right? And it's not optimal for women who are trying to lose abdominal atyposity, who are trying to get better insulin control, who are trying to change body composition.

Also said
“women don't need to do a whole bunch of zone 2 to get the benefits that is purported for zone 2 of increasing free fatty acid use, mitochondrial use, all that kind of stuff.”— Directly refutes the mechanistic claims made by Zone 2 proponents for women.
“If we're doing that long slow stuff all of the time, it's not a hard enough exercise stress to create these adaptations that we need to have that estrogen, progesterone, and some extent testosterone used to do for us.”— Links the missing hormonal stimulus to the necessity of high-intensity exercise in menopause.
“But if someone hasn't been doing that, I'm not going to say, 'Okay, now on the weekend, let's go for a 4-hour ride or three-hour rock because that's contra indicative to what we want for the body.'”— Emphasizes that prescribing long steady-state sessions to deconditioned menopausal women can be counterproductive.

sprint-intervals-upregulate-glut4-independent-of-insulin

30-second all-out sprint interval training induces an epigenetic change that opens more GLUT4 protein gates in skeletal muscle, allowing glucose to enter cells without requiring insulin, thereby improving insulin sensitivity within 3–4 weeks.

Why this matters: Provides a concrete molecular mechanism that explains why extremely short-duration, high-intensity exercise can rapidly reverse the insulin resistance common in menopause, without relying on traditional insulin-dependent pathways.

Background

Insulin resistance and central adiposity are hallmark metabolic shifts after menopause. Standard advice often focuses on calorie restriction or moderate exercise to manage blood sugar, but the specific role of GLUT4 translocation via high-intensity sprinting is rarely highlighted in public conversations.

Sims describes that during a true maximal sprint—30 seconds or less—the muscle experiences an epigenetic stimulus that upregulates the glucose transporter GLUT4. These proteins act as gates that move to the cell surface to usher glucose and carbohydrate inside, independent of insulin. Over approximately three to four weeks of consistent sprint work, the body adapts by increasing the number of these gates and their readiness to translocate. This means that less insulin is needed to handle a given glucose load, and skeletal muscle becomes more carbohydrate-sensitive. The adaptation essentially bypasses the insulin signaling pathway that often becomes blunted with age and hormonal decline. Sims presents this as a powerful, non-pharmacological strategy to restore metabolic control that was previously facilitated by estrogen and progesterone.

you're creating an epigenetic change within the muscle to open up more of what we call the glute 4 protein gates, which are the way that carbohydrate and glucose get into the muscle cell without insulin.

Also said
“It creates over course of, you know, 3 to four weeks of doing this kind of work. Now all of a sudden you have better insulin control because your body has said, 'Hey, skeletal muscle is more sensitive to carbohydrate. we have more of these proteins that transllocate to bring carbohydrate in. We don't have to rely much on insulin.'”— Specifies the timeline and outcome of the GLUT4 adaptation, making the claim actionable.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

1 item

Assault Bike (Air Resistance Bike)

Tool

Sims recommends the assault bike as the best piece of equipment to perform true sprint interval training safely and effectively, because it engages both the upper and lower body against air resistance and allows the user to track meters for progressive overload.

Sims highlights that the assault bike demands a simultaneous arm and leg effort against resistance, generating a full-body maximal output that is difficult to achieve with running, cycling, or other modalities. The ability to chase meters provides a quantifiable goal that helps people push closer to their true maximum during the 30-second sprints. She notes that while people tend to hate the assault bike because it is so demanding, that hatred is a sign of its effectiveness. She does not mention any brand or financial relationship, and her recommendation appears based purely on practical experience in coaching and her own use.

The best way I can teach someone to do that is on an assault bike where you're looking at arms and legs against resistance.

Also said
“I make people chase meters. I'm like, 'How hard can you go for 30 seconds?' And you can have a couple of friends around. Go, go, go, go, go.”— Illustrates how the assault bike's meter tracking facilitates high-intensity effort.
Find Assault

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
I tell women zone 2 is your soul food. ... But that's not optimal for this 50-year-old body, right? And it's not optimal for women who are trying to lose abdominal atyposity, who are trying to get better insulin control, who are trying to change body composition.
Encapsulates her central thesis that replaces Zone 2 with high-intensity work while acknowledging its mental benefits.
We need to look at that highintensity work. The stuff that we've been pushed away from doing just from a cultural nuance, the way we've grown up.
Calls out the cultural bias against women training intensely and frames SIT/HIIT as a corrective.
you're creating an epigenetic change within the muscle to open up more of what we call the glute 4 protein gates, which are the way that carbohydrate and glucose get into the muscle cell without insulin.
Offers a rare, precise molecular explanation from a practitioner, making the science immediately applicable.
If we're doing that long slow stuff all of the time, it's not a hard enough exercise stress to create these adaptations that we need to have that estrogen, progesterone, and some extent testosterone used to do for us.
Directly connects the loss of sex hormones to the requirement for high-intensity exercise, reframing menopause as a period that demands more intensity, not less.
The combination of the two is really really important for metabolic health and body comp.
The cleanest take-home recommendation—pairing SIT and HIIT—delivered with clarity and simplicity.
Most people are like, 'Oh, I can do three to five or eight of those.' It's like, 'Oh, we'll see.' Cuz usually it's like two and they're like, 'I'm done.' Because it's hard.
Humorously grounds the protocol in reality, warning against overestimating one's capacity for true all-out sprints.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

zone-2-cardiomenopausesprint-interval-traininghigh-intensity-interval-traininginsulin-sensitivityglut4-transportersvisceral-fatassault-bikefemale-physiologymetabolic-healthpolarized-trainingsoul-food
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.