UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Why Modern Science Is Misleading You
~247 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Why Modern Science Is Misleading You

Ben Greenfield
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Much of the scientific research published in high-impact journals is compromised by issues like image manipulation, paper mills (paying to add names to papers), and a flawed peer-review process where reviewers work for free and often know the authors.

2

The foundational amyloid-beta plaque theory for Alzheimer's, which influenced research from 2006-2022, was based on a Nature paper later found to have manipulated images. The lead author eventually admitted to the fraud.

3

P-values, a common statistical tool, are easily manipulated and do not accurately measure clinical significance or replicability. Their creator, Fischer, explicitly warned against their use in medicine.

4

Metabolic dysfunction, driven by chronic high insulin levels from high-carb diets and seed oils, is presented as the root cause of many chronic diseases like type 2 diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer's, and cardiovascular issues. MetFix offers education and training to reverse these conditions through diet and exercise.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

6 items

Carnivore Diet for Resetting Metabolism

WhatFollowing a carnivore diet for a period to reset the body's metabolic state.
WhenFor a month or so at a time.
DoseApproximately one month.
For whomIndividuals with a 'huge sweet tooth' or those looking for a metabolic reset.
WhyTo help reset the body and reduce sugar cravings, promoting metabolic flexibility.

Emily Kaplan personally uses the carnivore diet as a tool to reset her metabolism, particularly when she feels her sugar cravings are high. She views it as a way to 'reset myself' and break away from the constant storage mode induced by high carbohydrate intake. This practice aligns with the broader MetFix philosophy of achieving metabolic flexibility, where the body can efficiently switch between burning fat and carbohydrates for fuel.

Mechanism

By eliminating carbohydrates, the carnivore diet drastically reduces insulin secretion, allowing the body to shift from glucose-burning to fat-burning (ketosis) and potentially improve insulin sensitivity. This helps break the cycle of chronic high insulin and constant storage mode.

Personal experience

I love sugar that I really do try to limit it and I will do carnivore for like you know a month or so at a time to sort of feel like I'm resetting myself.

I love sugar that I really do try to limit it and I will do carnivore for like you know a month or so at a time to sort of feel like I'm resetting myself.

Alcohol Abstinence for Resetting Habits

WhatEliminating alcohol for a month.
WhenFor a month at a time.
DoseOne month.
For whomAnyone looking for a reset or to observe social dynamics around alcohol.
WhyTo serve as a social experiment and a 'good reset' for habits and social patterns around drinking.

Kaplan mentions using alcohol abstinence as a personal reset, similar to her approach with the carnivore diet. She highlights the social aspect of this, noting how often people react to someone abstaining from alcohol, revealing social pressures and habits. This practice is framed as a way to gain perspective and break ingrained patterns.

Personal experience

Um and I' I've done that with alcohol too where like you just get rid of alcohol for a month and it's always for me like sort of a social experiment because you realize like how many people are like but m it's my birthday right or like can't you do it next month and like that's actually like a really good good reset.

Um and I' I've done that with alcohol too where like you just get rid of alcohol for a month and it's always for me like sort of a social experiment because you realize like how many people are like but m it's my birthday right or like can't you do it next month and like that's actually like a really good good reset.

Eliminating Seed Oils

WhatActively avoiding seed oils in one's diet.
WhenConsistently, especially when cooking at home or eating out.
DoseOngoing.
For whomEveryone, particularly those looking to improve metabolic health and prevent chronic disease.
WhySeed oils contribute to metabolic dysfunction by disrupting cellular signaling, leading to cells feeling perpetually hungry and promoting ectopic fat storage, which is a precursor to chronic disease.
CaveatsRequires vigilance, as seed oils are prevalent in processed foods and restaurant cooking.

Kaplan emphasizes the importance of eliminating seed oils, noting their pervasive presence in modern diets, even in seemingly healthy or high-end restaurant settings. She recounts an experience at a fancy steakhouse where she discovered steaks were coated in canola oil before grilling. The combination of seed oils and high-carb diets is presented as a major factor making it difficult for people to eat healthily. She suggests that avoiding seed oils naturally leads to a reduction in ultra-processed foods and eating out, as these are primary sources.

Mechanism

Seed oils are believed to cause reactive oxygen species to be low, which impairs the cell's ability to signal satiety. This means that even when cells are 'full,' they continue to signal hunger, leading to overconsumption and the spilling over of amino acids into the blood. This process results in ectopic fat deposition on organs, a key driver of chronic disease.

So with the seed oils, what we're seeing is that basically insulin opens the door to the cell and starts shoveling in all of the, you know, nutrients or sugar or whatever. And then the cell is like, I'm full. but it actually doesn't get the reactive oxygen species signaling molecule to tell it it's full. It tells it it's still hungry.

Prioritizing Whole, Home-Cooked Foods

WhatCooking meals at home rather than relying on ordering out or processed foods.
WhenRegularly, as a foundational health practice.
DoseConsistent practice.
For whomAnyone seeking to improve their health and metabolic function.
WhyIt is very difficult to reclaim health without cooking, as it allows control over ingredients and avoidance of problematic substances like seed oils.

Kaplan highlights cooking at home as a crucial step in reclaiming health. She notes that many people, especially those who haven't cooked in years, find it transformative. This practice directly addresses the issue of seed oils and other unhealthy ingredients prevalent in restaurant and processed foods, giving individuals direct control over what they consume. The MetFix 'daily fix' includes a recipe of the day designed to be made in under 15 minutes to encourage this habit.

And I really think it's very hard to reclaim health if you're not cooking.

Engaging in Play and Fun Movement

WhatIncorporating elements of play, silliness, and enjoyment into physical activity and daily routines.
WhenRegularly, as a way to maintain consistency and motivation.
DoseOngoing.
For whomEveryone, particularly those who struggle with consistency in exercise or healthy habits.
WhyMaking health activities fun and enjoyable increases consistency, which is the 'best hack' for long-term success, especially for tasks that might otherwise feel mundane or difficult.

Kaplan advocates for 'play' as a non-negotiable for health, suggesting that adults often lose the ability to be silly and find joy in movement. She uses the analogy of a child making a game out of cleaning their room to illustrate how infusing fun into tasks can make them more manageable and consistent. This approach aims to counteract the tendency to overcomplicate health, which can lead to people quitting. By making activities like working out or eating right more enjoyable, individuals are more likely to stick with them, leading to greater long-term success.

Personal experience

I'm a big believer in play. And I think like really when you're playing and you're allowing yourself to be creative and have fun, you know, that often involves movement, right?

I'm a big believer in play. And I think like really when you're playing and you're allowing yourself to be creative and have fun, you know, that often involves movement, right?

Utilizing Incentives for Exercise

WhatPairing exercise with an enjoyable activity, such as listening to engaging audiobooks.
WhenDuring workouts.
DoseAs needed to motivate exercise.
For whomIndividuals who find it challenging to motivate themselves for workouts.
WhyCreating a reward system or making exercise productive and enjoyable can significantly increase motivation and consistency.

The host, Ben Greenfield, shares his personal strategy of saving 'super juicy' audiobooks or highly recommended books specifically for his gym time. This creates a strong incentive, transforming his daily workout into a highly anticipated learning opportunity. Kaplan endorses this approach, calling it 'brilliant' and a way of 'incentivizing yourself to go.' This method leverages the reward system to make a necessary activity more appealing, thereby improving adherence and consistency.

Personal experience

I save all the good stuff for the gym. I'll listen to stuff otherwise. But like if there's something super juicy or a book that's highly recommended that always gets saved for the gym.

I save all the good stuff for the gym.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

4 items

Widespread Scientific Misconduct and Fraud

Many high-impact scientific journals publish research with manipulated images, fabricated data, and authors paying to have their names added to papers, leading to a crisis of replicability and trustworthiness in science.

Why this matters: This is a strong, contrarian stance directly challenging the integrity of the scientific publishing system, particularly in fields like medicine and nutrition, which are often considered authoritative.

Background

The speaker, Emily Kaplan, co-founded the Broken Science Initiative with Greg Glassman (CrossFit founder) to address what they perceive as systemic corruption and flaws in scientific practice, which they believe predates recent events like COVID-19 and has been ongoing for decades in nutrition and medicine.

Kaplan asserts that the current scientific landscape is plagued by significant issues, including 'paper mills' where individuals pay to be listed as authors on papers, sometimes even for research that was never conducted or labs that don't exist. She cites the Dana Farber scandal, where 53 papers were flagged for image manipulation, as a prominent example. Furthermore, she highlights the 'replication crisis,' noting that a significant portion of research findings, particularly in cancer and hematology, cannot be replicated, even when original scientists are involved and given anonymity. This systemic failure means that much of the scientific literature, including foundational studies, is unreliable, yet continues to influence medical practice and drug development.

So they basically exposed that this work had been completely manipulated. All of the work from let's say 2006 to 2022 that we have relied on for Alzheimer's was based on this study published in Nature.

Flawed Peer Review Process

The peer-review system, intended to ensure scientific rigor, is deeply flawed because reviewers work for free, are often anonymous, and may have conflicts of interest or personal relationships with authors, leading to biased and unchecked publications.

Why this matters: This challenges the widely accepted notion that peer review is a robust gatekeeper for scientific quality, exposing its vulnerabilities to bias and lack of thoroughness.

Kaplan explains that peer reviewers are typically unpaid volunteers, often from the same academic community as the authors, creating a 'I scratch your back, you scratch mine' dynamic. Reviewers are instructed to assume the submitted work is free of misconduct, meaning there's no systematic fact-checking or data re-analysis. This system prioritizes 'novel' findings over replicability, further exacerbating the problem. The financial model of journals, where taxpayers fund research, scientists pay to submit, and journals charge high subscription fees, is described as a 'beautiful business model' for the journals but detrimental to scientific integrity and public access to information.

So we have these massive problems with you know something that probably started with good intentions. I mean like collaboration is super important in these fields right and being able to share your results and learn from each other and grow off of them. But what I am you know sort and Greg were like pretty obsessed with is how these things have gone wrong.

P-values are Misleading for Clinical Significance

P-values, a statistical tool widely used to determine 'significance' in research, were never intended for medical application and are easily manipulated, leading to findings that lack clinical relevance or replicability.

Why this matters: This is a direct critique of a fundamental statistical concept in scientific research, suggesting that many 'significant' findings are not truly meaningful.

Kaplan states that the creator of p-values, Fischer, explicitly warned against their use in medicine, intending them as a quality control tool. P-values assess the probability of observing data given a null hypothesis, not whether an intervention actually works or is clinically important. They rely on the assumption that the null hypothesis is accurate, which is often a 'massive assumption.' Furthermore, p-values are susceptible to 'p-hacking,' where researchers can manipulate sample sizes or other variables to achieve a statistically 'significant' result, even if the actual effect is negligible or not reproducible. This contributes to the high rate of non-replicable research and findings that don't translate into effective clinical practice.

So, the guy who came up with P values was named Fischer and he basically was like, please don't ever use these in medicine. This is a a a me like a tool for quality control.

Metabolic Dysfunction as the Root of Chronic Disease

Chronic diseases like cancer, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's, mental health issues, and cardiovascular disease are fundamentally metabolic dysfunctions, primarily driven by insulin dysregulation caused by high-carb diets and seed oils.

Why this matters: This presents a unified theory for the origin of many seemingly disparate chronic diseases, shifting the focus from individual disease management to a common metabolic root cause.

Kaplan argues that the medical system often treats chronic diseases as separate issues (e.g., cancer on one floor, Alzheimer's in the basement), but they are all interconnected through metabolic dysfunction. Type 2 diabetes, a clear metabolic issue, is identified as the biggest risk factor for all other chronic diseases. The core mechanism proposed is that chronically high insulin levels, induced by excessive consumption of carbohydrates and sugars, keep the body in a 'storage mode.' This prevents the body from accessing fat for energy, leading to constant hunger and fatigue. Additionally, seed oils are implicated in disrupting cellular signaling, making cells feel perpetually 'hungry' and leading to ectopic fat deposition on organs, which is seen as the beginning of chronic disease.

But what do we know? We know type 2 diabetes for sure is a metabolic dysfunction that has to do with insulin regulation, right? And we know that the biggest risk factor for all of those other chronic diseases is type two diabetes.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

3 items

Broken Science Initiative

Product

An education and publishing company co-founded by Emily Kaplan and Greg Glassman (founder of CrossFit) dedicated to exposing flaws in scientific research and promoting metabolic health.

The Broken Science Initiative (brokenscience.org) was created to address the systemic issues within scientific research, particularly in medicine and nutrition. It aims to educate the public on how science is practiced, the prevalence of corruption, and how to critically evaluate research. The initiative emphasizes the importance of individual ownership over health and focuses on metabolic health as a foundational element. They offer educational resources, including online classes on topics like type 2 diabetes and women's health, and host events to disseminate their findings.

Personal experience

And I actually kind of like what's going on. And I'm not going to try to explain it because I've got Emily on the podcast. So, she gets to to fill us in on what all of this is because I think you could make a case that science is broken to a certain extent, at least the way that it's practiced.

The broken science initiative is like technically a publishing company or an education company and it's Greg Glassman who was the founder of CrossFit who sold in 2020 and I partnered together on this initiative.

Also said
“Broken Science is really trying to push to the forefront how we have this break, how broken things are, and that the individual really needs to take some ownership over their health.”— Highlights the core mission of the organization.
Find Broken

MetFix (Metabolic Fix)

Service

An affiliate model program focused on reversing chronic disease through diet and exercise, particularly in a gym setting.

MetFix (metfix.org) was launched by Emily Kaplan and Greg Glassman to provide rigorous training and education on metabolic health. It operates on an affiliate model, similar to CrossFit, with locations in the US, UK, and Europe. The program teaches the mechanisms of how the body processes food for energy and how to reverse disease states. It emphasizes that chronic diseases are metabolic dysfunctions and that conditions like type 2 diabetes can be reversed in the gym. MetFix also offers 'special population classes' for individuals with conditions like type 2 diabetes, aiming to make fitness accessible to those who need it most but might feel intimidated by traditional gym environments.

vs alternatives

Presented as a solution to the perceived failures of mainstream medicine in addressing chronic disease, offering a practical, gym-based approach to metabolic health.

So, we launched MetFix, which really stands for metabolic fix, and we have a very rigorous training that people have to do over it takes two days, but then there's a year-long class online, and it really gets into the mechanisms of action of like how does your body process food as energy and how does that either lead to health or lead to disease?

Also said
“We're willing to put a stake in the ground and say that you can reverse chronic disease in the gym and we're going to teach you how to do it.”— States the core claim and purpose of MetFix.
“Our curriculum is really controversial, not because it's not based in biology and you can find anything we're teaching in a biology textbook, but because it is not taught to doctors and it is not taught to registered dietitians.”— Explains why their approach is considered controversial despite being biologically sound.
Find MetFix

PubPeer

Product

A website where image forensics experts and researchers anonymously flag scientific papers for misconduct, particularly image manipulation.

PubPeer is described as an 'amazing' platform where experts, often using pseudonyms, dedicate their time to scrutinizing published scientific images for signs of manipulation. These individuals, including AI experts and researchers fed up with misconduct, act as a crowdsourced quality control mechanism, identifying issues that the formal peer-review process often misses. The site played a role in exposing the Dana Farber scandal, where 53 papers were flagged for image manipulation.

vs alternatives

Contrasted with the official peer-review process, which is described as failing to catch such misconduct.

So there's this site called PubPier, which is amazing. It's all these image who basically are either AI experts or they're researchers and they're really sick of all the misconduct.

Also said
“And so they go on and they have pseudonyms and then sometimes, you know, there's a woman named Elizabeth Bick who's been the New York Times has written about who's really good at this stuff. and they basically as a hobby for free go through and look at all of these journals that have all these images and they try to see which ones have been manipulated.”— Details how PubPeer operates and the dedication of its contributors.
Find PubPeer
Disclosed sponsorships1speaker disclosed

Vandy Chips

Product Sponsored · disclosed

Chips cooked in beef tallow, offered as an example of a satisfying, healthy snack that promotes satiety due to saturated fat content, unlike seed oil-cooked alternatives.

DisclosureBen Greenfield invested in the company.

Vandy chips are highlighted as a personal example of a food product that aligns with the principles of metabolic health. The key differentiator is that they are cooked in beef tallow, a saturated fat, which Kaplan explains contributes to satiety. She contrasts this with the experience of eating Doritos (presumably cooked in seed oils), where one can eat an entire bag without feeling full. The satiety from Vandy chips is attributed to the saturated fat, which helps signal fullness to the body, unlike seed oils that disrupt this signaling. The host also mentions having invested in Vandy, indicating his belief in the product.

vs alternatives

Compared to Doritos, which are implied to be cooked in seed oils and do not provide the same satiety.

Personal experience

I eat like five of those and I'm full. It's a completely different experience, right? And it's why it's because the saturated fat is making me full, right? The seed oils aren't.

They're great. I actually when they when they first launched, uh I I'm like, "Oh, these are like crack." So, I I actually put a bunch of money in Masa and Vandy when they launched.

Find Vandy

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
This is the first time in history that scientists are being maligned for doing science and Greg and I were both like no it's not like this has been going on in nutrition and medicine has been, you know, a mess for decades.
Highlights the speaker's belief that the 'broken science' issue is not new but a long-standing problem, particularly in nutrition and medicine.
I make a bold claim about something and I'm able to show that I can do it and that I can do it again. And actually that doesn't really take into account anything like peer review or even this null hypothesis significance testing that we're relying on.
Offers a direct, alternative definition of what constitutes 'scientific' proof, emphasizing replicable results over current peer-review and statistical methods.
I mean, we just had this big scandal that I mean, this is like the tip of the iceberg really. So, like you look at things like um Dana Farber, I'm in Boston, the like pre-eminent Harvard teaching hospital here for cancer. Um, yeah, yeah, yeah, they had 53 papers flagged for image manipulation.
Provides a concrete, high-profile example of scientific fraud (image manipulation) at a prestigious institution, underscoring the severity of the problem.
I mean the average woman over the age of 65 is on five or more medications. And I always like to say even if you believe that peer review is great and you think that p values are a measurement of statistical significance can talk about why they're not why they're not five or more medications, no one's tested that. So they're not testing drug interactions.
Raises a critical, often overlooked point about polypharmacy: the lack of research on drug interactions, making the common practice of multiple prescriptions a 'wild west' scenario.
So, if we say the medical system is going to, you know, treat you this way, like I go in, I have cancer, I'm going to be sent to the fifth floor of the hospital. I have Alzheimer's, I'm going to be sent to the basement. I'm depressed, I'm going to be sent to the garden, right? like they're not going to treat these things as the same problem. But what do we know? We know type 2 diabetes for sure is a metabolic dysfunction that has to do with insulin regulation, right?
Illustrates the siloed approach of conventional medicine to chronic diseases, contrasting it with the speaker's view that they share a common metabolic root.
I think the truth the the best hack is honestly consistency and it's also the hardest thing for people to do.
A concise and impactful statement on the most effective, yet challenging, aspect of achieving health goals.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

scientific misconductalzheimer's research fraudbroken science initiativepeer review flawsfalsification principlep-valuesbayesian probabilitypaper millsimage manipulationdana farber scandalreplication crisisdrug interactionsvaccine testingmetabolic dysfunctioninsulin resistancechronic disease reversalmetfixrelative vs absolute riskhealthy user biasred meat studies
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.