UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
New Vitamin D & Immune System Study
~18 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

New Vitamin D & Immune System Study

Brad Stanfield
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

A new randomized controlled trial in 189 Danish children found that 1,000 IU of vitamin D per day during winter reduced sick days from respiratory infections by 17%, and fever days by 43%, highlighting that the right dose matters.

2

The dose is critical: 800–1,000 IU daily appears effective for preventing winter deficiency and boosting immunity in kids, while 400 IU is often insufficient, and doses above 4,000 IU caused bone density loss.

3

The 2024 Endocrine Society guidelines now recommend 600–800 IU daily for general adults, but 3,000 IU for pregnant women, 3,500 IU for those at risk of diabetes, and continued supplementation for adults over 75.

4

Brad Stanfield reduced the vitamin D in his personal supplement Microvitamin from 2,000 IU to 1,000 IU to align with new evidence, and gives his three children the correct dose.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

6 items

Winter Vitamin D Supplementation for Children to Reduce Respiratory Infections

WhatGive children 800–1,000 IU of vitamin D daily during winter to maintain levels and lower infection risk.
WhenDuring winter months (or when sun exposure is low), typically for a 6-month period.
Dose800–1,000 IU per day, targeting an effective average of around 800 IU after missed doses.
For whomChildren, especially those in northern latitudes or with limited outdoor sun exposure during winter; not necessary if vitamin D levels are already adequate (e.g., >50 nmol/L).
WhyPrevents vitamin D deficiency that occurs in winter, which blunts immune responses and increases respiratory infections.
CaveatsNot needed if vitamin D status is already sufficient. Doses above 4,000 IU can harm bone density and increase fall risk. The 400 IU recommended in some Nordic countries may be too low.

The new Danish RCT, combined with a previous Chinese trial, demonstrates that supplementation with ~800–1,000 IU during winter lowers respiratory infection incidence and severity. The effect is conditional: children whose levels drop below 50 nmol/L benefit, while those who maintain >92 nmol/L (as in the Canadian study) do not. The Endocrine Society cautiously endorses this use. Stanfield applies this protocol to his own three children.

Mechanism

Vitamin D enhances innate immune antimicrobial peptide production and modulates inflammatory cytokines. A dose of 800 IU maintained normal immune responses during infections in prior research, while 400 IU did not.

Personal experience

That's the reason why I give the correct dose of vitamin D to my three children.

It makes sense to supplement with vitamin D to help prevent and lessen the severity of respiratory tract infections in kids.

Also said
“Daily vitamin D supplements of 800 units helped to maintain normal immune system responses during infections. But in contrast, a daily dose of 400 units didn't seem to help.”— Directly explains the dose-dependent immune effect.
“The reason that vitamin D supplements would help in that population is that they keep the vitamin D levels from falling too low.”— Clarifies the mechanism of benefit – prevention of deficiency.

General Adult Vitamin D Supplementation for Deficiency Prevention

WhatTake 600–800 IU of vitamin D daily to avoid deficiency and lock in established benefits.
WhenYear-round or as needed, especially if sun exposure is low or diet lacks vitamin D.
Dose600 IU daily for adults under 50; 800 IU daily for those 50 and older.
For whomGeneral adult population not in special risk groups (pregnant, prediabetes, elderly).
WhyMatches the latest Endocrine Society guidelines that ensure adequate vitamin D levels without the risks of high doses.
CaveatsHigher doses do not improve heart health, cancer rates, or all-cause mortality. Exceeding ~4,000 IU can harm bone density.

Observational studies once suggested widespread benefits, but large trials like VITAL and a 2024 meta-analysis found no reduction in heart attacks, cancer, or all-cause mortality with supplementation. Consequently, the 2024 Endocrine Society guidelines scaled back recommendations to 600–800 IU, enough to prevent nutritional deficiency and the known harms of hypovitaminosis D while avoiding the dangers of supra-physiological doses. Stanfield now follows this threshold.

The latest endocrine society guidelines suggest following a recommended daily intake of 600 international units for younger adults and increasing that to 800 international units as you hit 50 and above.

Also said
“That dose is less than the previous endocrine society guidelines that we noted earlier.”— Highlights the evidence-based downgrade.

Vitamin D Supplementation for Pregnant Women

WhatTake about 3,000 IU of vitamin D daily during pregnancy.
WhenThroughout pregnancy.
DoseApproximately 3,000 IU daily.
For whomPregnant women.
WhyLowers risk of pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, and improves newborn health.

Supplementation during pregnancy can lower the risk of preeacclampsia and preterm birth. It can even improve newborn health. So for that purpose, typical doses are around 3,000 international units daily.

Vitamin D Supplementation for Prediabetes

WhatTake about 3,500 IU of vitamin D daily to reduce risk of progressing to diabetes.
WhenWhen at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
DoseApproximately 3,500 IU daily.
For whomIndividuals at high risk of progressing to diabetes.
WhyVitamin D may play a preventive role in progression from prediabetes to diabetes.

The second group is those who are at high risk of progressing to diabetes. Vitamin D could play a preventative role here. And studies suggest an average dose of about 3 and a half thousand international units daily.

Vitamin D Supplementation for Adults 75 and Older

WhatSupplement with vitamin D to maintain bone health, muscle function, and overall resilience.
WhenStarting at age 75 (or as advised by a physician).
DoseNot explicitly specified; likely follows the 800 IU+ guideline for those over 50, but may be determined individually.
For whomAdults aged 75 years and older.
WhyAging skin and kidneys reduce natural vitamin D production and activation; supplementation may lower mortality risk in this age group.
Mechanism

As we age, skin becomes less efficient at producing vitamin D from sunlight and kidneys convert less to active vitamin D.

And the third group is adults 75 years and older. So as we age, the risk of death appears to decrease with vitamin D supplementation.... This is why the guidelines specifically call out older adults as a group that may benefit from regular vitamin D supplementation.

Avoid High-Dose Vitamin D (Above 4,000 IU)

WhatDo not take vitamin D doses exceeding 4,000 IU daily without medical necessity.
WhenAlways, unless specifically prescribed for a diagnosed deficiency.
DoseStay below 4,000 IU daily; 600–800 IU is sufficient for most adults.
For whomGeneral population; anyone considering high-dose supplementation.
WhyHigh doses (4,000–10,000 IU) reduced bone density in a clinical trial and are associated with increased falls and possible muscle weakness.
CaveatsSome medical conditions may require supervised higher doses, but more is not better for the average person.

A Canadian three-year trial compared 400 IU, 4,000 IU, and 10,000 IU of vitamin D daily. The 4,000 IU group lost 2.4% wrist bone density, and the 10,000 IU group lost 3.5%. Additionally, studies link high vitamin D with falls, potentially due to muscle weakness. This runs counter to the social media narrative pushing mega-doses. Stanfield now ensures his own supplement stays at 1,000 IU. The Endocrine Society’s revised lower recommendations reflect this risk.

Mechanism

Excessive vitamin D may paradoxically impair bone mineralization and cause muscle weakness, though exact pathways were not detailed. The trial showed wrist bone density loss of 2.4% at 4,000 IU and 3.5% at 10,000 IU over three years.

When it comes to vitamin D supplementation, more is definitely not always better.

Also said
“The groups who took higher doses didn't see improvements. In fact, it seemed to make things worse. So, bone density in the wrist decreased by about 2.4% in the 4,000 international unit group and a whopping 3 and a half percent in the 10,000 international unit group.”— Gives the exact harmful effect.
“There's also a study showing that higher doses of vitamin D seem to correlate with an increased risk of falls and the authors of that study seem to indicate that higher levels of vitamin D might cause muscle weakness.”— Additional harm besides bone loss.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

2 items

New Denmark trial clarifies vitamin D's role in respiratory infections

5:30-7:00

A just-published RCT in 189 children over 6 months of winter demonstrated that daily 1,000 IU vitamin D reduced sick days by 17% and fever days by 43%, supporting targeted supplementation when vitamin D levels are at risk of dropping.

Why this matters: This study reconciles conflicting earlier trials (China found benefit, Canada did not) by showing that supplementation works only when baseline or post-supplementation vitamin D levels are sufficient. The dose of ~800–1,000 IU was key.

Background

Previous child respiratory infection studies were split: a Chinese trial with 1200 IU reduced influenza A infections, while a Canadian trial with 200 vs 400 IU found no difference. The reasons for the discrepancy were unclear until now.

The trial enrolled 189 children in Denmark, where winter sunlight is scarce, causing natural vitamin D drops. The supplementation group received 1,000 IU (25 µg) daily vs placebo. Outcomes: 17% fewer sick days from all respiratory infections, and 43% fewer days with fever. The authors purposely targeted an effective dose around 800 IU; they chose 1,000 IU because children miss doses, netting an average 800 IU/day. This dose aligns with their earlier research showing 800 IU maintained normal immune responses while 400 IU did not. The Canadian trial that showed no benefit had post-study vitamin D levels of 92 nmol/L even in the low-dose group – higher than the Danish children's starting levels – meaning they were already sufficient. Thus, vitamin D supplementation only helps when levels would otherwise fall below the deficiency threshold (~50 nmol/L). This adds confidence to the Endocrine Society’s cautious endorsement, and Stanfield now supplements his own children accordingly.

Personal experience

That's the reason why I give the correct dose of vitamin D to my three children.

The children who took vitamin D had 17% fewer sick days from respiratory tract infections. And what's more, they had an incredible 43% fewer days with the respiratory tract infections that were accompanied with the fever.

Also said
“The dose seems to be critical.”— Emphasizes the key variable that differed between the studies.
“The authors of the new study wanted the kids to get a daily dose of 800 international units. But they realized that for normal kids, they're going to miss some doses. So they figured that the actual average intake with a 1,000 international unit dose would be about 800 units.”— Explains the pragmatic dose selection that underlies the protocol.
“At the end of the study, the average vitamin D levels were 92 nanomoles per liter in the low-dose group. That figure is even higher than the average for the children at the start of the Denmark study.”— Reveals why the Canadian study didn't find a benefit – participants already had sufficient levels.

Personal supplement reformulation after 2024 guidelines

9:00-9:30

Stanfield reduced the vitamin D dose in his own supplement (Microvitamin) from 2,000 IU to 1,000 IU following the latest Endocrine Society guidelines, and included vitamin K2 and magnesium as co-factors.

Why this matters: It's a direct, concrete practice change by a careful supplement user and evidence follower, reflecting the shift in expert recommendations.

Background

The previous 2011 Endocrine Society guidelines suggested up to 2,000 IU/day might be needed, and many supplements were formulated at higher doses. The 2024 revision lowered the general recommendation to 600–800 IU.

After reviewing the 2024 Endocrine Society guidelines, which lowered the recommended intake for the general population to 600–800 IU daily, Stanfield changed his personal supplement formulation. He dropped the vitamin D content from 2,000 IU to 1,000 IU per daily dose. He also explained that recent evidence shows a relationship between vitamin D, vitamin K2, and magnesium, which is why he kept those in the product. He is transparent that he personally takes this supplement but does not mean the viewer should necessarily do the same, underscoring the risk of excessive intake.

Personal experience

I reduced the dose of vitamin D in microvitamin from 2,000 to 1,000 international units when the new guidelines were released. There's also a relationship between vitamin D and vitamin K2 and magnesium, which is why I also included both of those in micro vitamin.

I reduced the dose of vitamin D in microvitamin from 2,000 to 1,000 international units when the new guidelines were released.

Also said
“There's also a relationship between vitamin D and vitamin K2 and magnesium, which is why I also included both of those in micro vitamin.”— Shows the reasoning behind the supplement's composition.
Disclosed sponsorships1speaker disclosed

Microvitamin

Product Sponsored · disclosed

Stanfield mentions Microvitamin as the supplement he personally takes, explaining that he reduced its vitamin D from 2,000 IU to 1,000 IU after the 2024 guidelines and included co-factors K2 and magnesium.

DisclosureBrad Stanfield is the creator of Microvitamin, a custom supplement containing vitamin D, vitamin K2, and magnesium.

Microvitamin is a multi-nutrient supplement designed to provide vitamin D at a dose aligned with the latest evidence, plus vitamin K2 and magnesium because of their synergistic relationship with vitamin D. Stanfield uses it as part of his personal regimen and adjusted the formula when the new endocrine society recommendations came out. He emphasizes that his personal use does not constitute a blanket recommendation.

Personal experience

I reduced the dose of vitamin D in microvitamin from 2,000 to 1,000 international units when the new guidelines were released. There's also a relationship between vitamin D and vitamin K2 and magnesium, which is why I also included both of those in micro vitamin.

I reduced the dose of vitamin D in microvitamin from 2,000 to 1,000 international units when the new guidelines were released.

Also said
“There's also a relationship between vitamin D and vitamin K2 and magnesium, which is why I also included both of those in micro vitamin.”— Explains the formulation rationale.
“But just because I take a supplement does not in any way mean that you should as well.”— Transparent disclaimer about personal use vs. recommendation.
Find Microvitamin

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

5 items
Correlation is not the same thing as causation. So everyone knows that gray hair, for example, is associated with getting older, but that doesn't mean that gray hair causes aging. and we're not going to stay youthful if we suddenly start dying our hair.
A vivid and memorable analogy explaining the fundamental flaw in early vitamin D observational studies.
The children who took vitamin D had 17% fewer sick days from respiratory tract infections. And what's more, they had an incredible 43% fewer days with the respiratory tract infections that were accompanied with the fever.
The headline result from the new study – a concrete, striking benefit with a surprising magnitude for fever days.
When it comes to vitamin D supplementation, more is definitely not always better.
A sharp counterpoint to the social media hype around high-dose vitamin D, backed by the bone density trial.
Vitamin D supplements did not reduce the rate of heart attacks. They also didn't bring down cancer rates.
Succinctly summarizes the disappointment from large, long-term randomized trials, challenging years of hope.
Bone density in the wrist decreased by about 2.4% in the 4,000 international unit group and a whopping 3 and a half percent in the 10,000 international unit group.
The startling quantitative evidence that high-dose supplementation can actively harm bone health.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

vitamin-dimmune-systemrespiratory-infectionschildren-healthsupplementation-dosageobservational-studiesclinical-trialsendocrine-society-guidelinesbone-healthvitamin-d-toxicitypregnancy-nutritiondiabetes-preventionelderly-healthcorrelation-vs-causation
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.